Not exact matches
There can
be no doubt that
God makes decisions a propos of the disjunctive multiplicity of eternal objects; the difficulty
is to establish in precisely what sense these divine decisions
are distinguishable from the
choices and calculations made by the Leibnizian deity Whitehead's dilemma seems to
be this: on the one hand, the principle of classification
is to
be challenged by positing the primordiality of a world of eternal objects that knows «no exclusions, expressive in
logical terms»; on the other hand, positing pure potentiality as a «boundless and unstructured infinity» (IWM 252) lacking all
logical order would seem to
be precisely that conceptual move which renders it «inefficacious» or «irrelevant.»
Arminians often met this objection to foreknowledge by appealing to a
logical distinction between necessity and certainty.5 The fact that
God foreknows that
choice X
is going to
be made (freely) means only that X
is certain to occur; it does not mean that
God's foreknowledge, or any other cause, necessitated X.
Whether to follow his example or not
is a personal
choice everyone gets to make, but at least make an informed
choice, knowing who Jesus actually
was, and what he actually did and
is doing, and not assuming the the over 44,000 Christian denominations
are all telling the truth — not even
logical since they
are all saying different things, and the Bible says
God's people would
be united.
The only
logical choice for one claiming that there
is no
god is to
be an agnostic (there
is a possibility of a
god but I have no knowledge for whatever reason).
----- — The only
choice I've made,
is to use the mind
God gave me to think critically, to analyze, and to use a
logical decision making process.
I also believe that my faith
is a
choice, and
am not so deluded as to think that there
is either a valid,
logical proof for the existence of
God, or some kind of irrefutable physical evidence for
God's existence.