A vision arises from a careful reading of the context and the work required by
God of a particular people with a particular identity.
Hence, if we situate the call of Abraham, as well as other special revelatory moments of the history of religion, within the wider context of cosmic evolution, this may help soften the «scandal of particularity» associated with any unique or distinctive summoning by
God of a particular people to bear witness in a novel way to the divine promise and mystery that come to expression first in the very creation of the world.
Not exact matches
Hmmm, maybe
God established this set
of rules for a
particular group
of people at a
particular time and it isn't meant to be taken literally by us today.
With that in mind, the prophetess as
God's voice, as judge, as apostle, as leader has precedence in the scriptural history
of God's
people as far back as at least Judges and as recently Acts, to saying nothing
of those who have been recognised as
particular saints since then (although I'm not RC I don't deny there are
people worthy
of particular honour).
The Bible is full
of stories
of God interacting with His
people in
particular, and the human race in general.
Christians actually get angry when
people don't talk about their
particular version
of god before they die.
This is just another example
of a command that
God gave to Israel
people in that
particular situation.
A lot
of people on here seem to want to have the corner on Christianity via their
particular political brand, but are you guys on
God's side as much as you presuppose He's on yours.
It may well be the case that
God so respects the «humanity»
of each
particular individual that he will seldom, if ever, override those decisions which are significant in an individual's own life history, even if the actualization
of such decisions will negatively affect large numbers
of people.
It can be argued, however, that to minimize the miraculous and thereby conclude that what occurs in nature in relation to
particular persons can not be controlled by
God alleviates the problem
of natural evil only up to a point.
Sean Doherty
of Living Out (and my conversation partner later in this article) has reflected that: «
People can have a
particular sense
of shame and wanting to hide this from
God... I think secrecy is common in lots
of parts
of the Church.»
Naturally, when you preach a sermon like this to a group
of people who think
God hates filthy Gentile women and leprous enemy soldiers, and that
God's ultimate goal for such
people is to kill them and send them to burn forever in hell, you will not be the most popular teacher that this
particular audience has ever had.
In
particular cases, however,
God makes clear through a miracle effected by the prayers
of a
particular saint that this
person is in heaven.
Of course, these biblical passages have in mind, in particular, the transmission of a religious tradition: the story of God's care for his peopl
Of course, these biblical passages have in mind, in
particular, the transmission
of a religious tradition: the story of God's care for his peopl
of a religious tradition: the story
of God's care for his peopl
of God's care for his
people.
The whole story about some
god punishing a
person for all
of eternity for not believing in your
particular brand
of religion might scare a child enought to believe but most adults are way past such a silly concept.
God's call is addressed to a
particular group
of people.
Meticulously well - researched, carefully written, and beautifully delivered, the sermon highlighted why the eunuch's interest in the writings
of Isaiah were
of particular significance to his own life story, illustrating the inclusive and deeply personal love that
God has for all
people.
The Puritans, in
particular, were determined that their
people should be able to read and write so as to understand the meaning
of God's Word.
Whoever alleges that the Qur» an is the product
of a
particular people, or a special age, or a limited aspect
of human life is a disbeliever in Islam and in
God's Book.
Further, he insisted, a congregation's
particular story, because it draws from a treasury
of narrative elements available to all groups
of people as they struggle for survival and meaning, is its channel to participation in the worldwide mission
of establishing
God's shalom.
Locating the special call
of Abraham in terms
of cosmic evolution, and its whole series
of unique moments
of novel development, may help soften the scandal
of particularity involved in the special call
of God to a
particular people to bear witness to the divine promise to the cosmos.
In
particular, we may note that there are three points at which the Kingdom teaching
of the synoptic tradition tends to differ both from Judaism and from the early Church as represented by the remainder
of the New Testament: in the use
of the expression Kingdom
of God for (1) the final act
of God in visiting and redeeming his
people and (2) as a comprehensive term for the blessings
of salvation, i.e. things secured by that act
of God, and (3) in speaking
of the Kingdom as «coming».
All this means that the Church will often have conflicting understandings
of what it means to live as
God's
people in a
particular location or cultural setting.
The label «atheist» simply denotes
people who do not believe in any
particular idea
of a
god.
By engaging
people in the effort to understand
God by focusing study
of various subject matters within the horizon
of questions about Christian congregations, a theological school may help them cultivate capacities both for what Charles Wood [2] calls «vision,» that is, formulating comprehensive, synoptic accounts
of the Christian thing as a whole, and what he calls «discernment,» that is, insight into the meaning, faithfulness, and truth
of particular acts in the practice
of worship (in the broad sense
of worship that we have adopted for this discussion).
The call
of Abraham may be seen as a special instance
of the breaking in
of God's promise to the universe within the texture
of a
particular people's existence.
If a
particular deity, like the
God of Israel, says, «Only build one place
of worship» then this
God wants it to be difficult for His
people to come worship Him.
Yes, in
particular, it is LUDICROUS that this «
god» «chose» an arrogant
people in a Middle Eastern desert at a time when there was no internet and when those
people thought the world was flat and consisted
of the Mediterranean Sea and its surrounding lands (i.e., they had NO IDEA about the «New World», Antarctica.
I may not believe in any one
particular religion, and I certainly don't believe in
god, but even I believe that most religious
people have common sense enough to avoid the type
of hystaria that doomsdayers espouse themselves to.
When we say, then, that Jesus proclaimed the eschatological Kingdom
of God, we mean that he proclaimed the final and decisive activity
of God in visiting and redeeming his
people; no
particular form
of this activity is necessarily implied and no
particular accompanying phenomena must necessarily be present.
Ultimately, the question
of whether or not masturbation is healthy for a
particular person springs from the question that governs all good discernment: Does this action help me love myself and others more fully and freely, and does it allow me to love
God more deeply and with more
of myself?
The
particular and circumstantial expression
of revelation underlines the truth that
God has entered into actual history and has made himself known to
particular people at special times and places.
In the one case it is the principle that, in each
of a series
of succeeding ages,
God has tested his
people in terms
of their obedience to a
particular form
of his revelation; in the other, it is the proposition that
God's salvation is divinely initiated and established, that it is the same salvation throughout the Bible, and that it is the notion
of covenant which articulates this.
When
God chose to incarnate himself in human form and Jesus accepted his
God - given mission, this incarnation occurred within the stream
of a
particular history, the history
of the Jewish
people.
All
of it is true and inspired by
God but there are certain texts that things the
people did that were fitting for that given time frame and to that
particular audience.
As a mechanical engineer which would include using math and physics principles to help with the design
of a product with a
particular function; I challenge you now; that when you can create a living
person with all your intelligence and not use a woman to do it; I will be happy to listen to you... until then, I believe that
God the Father and Son and Holy Spirit worked together in 6 literal days and rested on the 7th Day and Santified and Hallowed that day.
You and your
God and all that believe like you can have full reign for all eternity in your
particular conceptualization
of your afterlife but here on Earth we like
people to be treated equal before human law.
For Paul,
God's will to harden is no longer a part
of His direct relation with a
particular person or generation.
Strings like, «There is something wrong with you if you don't speak in tongues» (a very unBiblical one that), you must have a full submersion baptism because the last baptism you had wasn't wet enough, you must sing naff choruses or it means you do nt» want to worship
God, you must believe that the vast majority
of people that have lived on earth are damned to everlasting Hell, you must not say anything controversial, you must not be too intellectually assertive if you're a woman, you must do as we say and believe as we say, you must force yourself to be attracted to
people with a
particular set
of genitalia or be lonely and unfulfilled for the rest
of your life.
Well, those
particular cherry picked lessons aren't too bad, though they ring hollow when married to the doctrine
of an all loving
god torturing
people for all eternity just because they doubt his existence or simply believe the wrong doctrines about him.
That's convenient — rely on a
particular image
of this version
of «
god» for so long, which by the way is depicted this way on the ceiling
of the Sistine Chapel, until
people start realizing it's nothing more than another version
of Santa, then simply move the goal posts by suddenly claiming «Huh?
Christianity teaches that this
particular individual, and so every individual, whatever in other respects this individual may be, man, woman, serving - maid, minister
of state, merchant, barber, student, etc. — this individual exists before
God — this individual who perhaps would be vain for having once in his life talked with the King, this man who is not a little proud
of living on intimate terms with that
person or the other, this man exists before
God, can talk with
God any moment he will, sure to be heard by Him; in short, this man is invited to live on the most intimate terms with
God!
And certainly the resurrection
of one
particular individual in advance
of this could indicate this
person's importance or merit in the eyes
of God.
A conference
of mainly African theologians, held in Ghana in December 1977, said in its final communiqué: «The
God of history speaks to all
peoples in
particular ways.
In one case the thinking and experience
of the
people produced a written record
of God's dealings with the Jewish
people in
particular.
To show how tyrannical any country that aimed at achieving perfect justice — even at the expense
of family, friendship, and the self - consciousness
of persons born to love other
persons and die as
particular persons — would be, Socrates turned the rulers into
gods and most
people into animals to be controlled.
I don't know
of a more profoundly failed position, or a more poorly defended one, than the assertion that a
particular God is real, alive, and intimately involved in the lives
of people.
The Christians, in their way, agree with the classical philosophers that the glory that was Rome is nothing in light
of eternity — although by eternity they mean the life beyond death that the personal
God makes possible for each
particular person.
Hebrews 11/12 makes it pretty clear that the criteria which marries the whole message is faith in
God's promise
of redemption, which leads us to live a
particular way in relation to
people and creation.
Any pattern
of thought that in any way abstracts
God «himself» from this
person, from his death or his career or his birth or his family or his Jewishness or his maleness or his teaching or the
particular intercession and rule he as risen now exercises, has, according to Nicea, no place in the church.