Scripture was used to support the idea of
a God of absolute power, thereby obscuring the biblical conception of a God of infinite love whose power was manifest in his suffering and humiliation in Jesus Christ.
Not exact matches
When the time is ripe,
God will act with
absolute power, and set up a kingdom
of righteousness which will endure for ever.
To treat any item in the universe, including status quo
power arrangements and «understandings»
of God, as in some way «
absolute» or inherently «sacred» is idolatry.
Because
of this, as Mormon philosopher David Paulsen observes, «
God does not have
absolute power.»
Augustine leaves no basis for conceiving any qualification
of the
absolute power of God over the creature.
But I shall argue that love can not breathe in such a «block universe».33 For St. Augustine all things are caught in the predetermined web
of God's
absolute, non-temporal, impassible, unchanging
power.
Bonhoeffer also believed that the concept
of God as a «supreme Being,
absolute in
power and goodness,» was a «spurious conception
of transcendence,» and that «
God as a working hypothesis in morals, politics, and science... should be dropped, or as far as possible eliminated» (Letters and Papers from Prison, S.C.M. Press edition, Great Britain: Fontana Books, 1953, pp. 122, 164, 360).
Christianity, for its part, is not so much a new thing as a prolonged episode within the greater history
of nihilism, notable chiefly for having brought part
of this history's logic to its consummation by having invented the metaphysical
God, the form
of all forms, who grounds all
of being in himself as
absolute efficient cause, and who personifies that cause as total
power and will.
The ultra-simple view
of divine creation was the Dark Age to Reformation non-evolutionary one:
God, the
absolute power, does it all, we are
God's deeds — puppets, only apparent doers.
For example, both Zwingli and Calvin, among others, were deceived by the proper idea
of God's
absolute Lordship and
power into formulating doctrines
of God's causal efficacy for all that occurs in the world.
The pessimistic attitude
of the Semitic mind toward the world as a fleeting shadow, the notion that it has value only as a place in which man prepares himself for a more permanent life, led to the conception that
God is the
absolute sovereign
power which rules all things, including man and his actions.
The essence
of God was regarded as
absolute power and will.
The elements that make up this
absolute Good are what we term ideas (attributes, qualities)
of God, such as life, love, substance,
power, wisdom... joy, strength, plenty, and every other good thing.»
John B. Cobb, Jr., and David Ray Griffin have expanded the list
of metaphors which are unacceptable in a Whiteheadian conception
of God to include five:
God as cosmic moralist,
God as the unchanging and passionless
absolute,
God as controlling
power,
God as sanctioner
of the status quo,
God as male (PT 8 - 10).
The
God who saves us is neither the wholly transcendent
absolute, the unmoved mover, nor is He merely the inward working
power among other
powers of the simple theology
of immanence.
It is precisely this which does not seem to be made sufficiently intelligible if we simply say that it comes about and is possible precisely because the
absolute and infinite operative
power of God has this act as its term.
Eberhard Jüngel raised the telling question: «Is not Feuerbach right when he fears that theology is more interested in the «
absolute power of God» and in the «hidden
God» (potentia dei absoluta, deus absconditus) than it is in the truth that
God is love?»
The outcome here, alas, is that
power has won out over love even as the
God of absolute omnipotence has been seen to have expired.
In the writings on «Culture» we find Niebuhr stating his familiar convictions that faith in
God entails the rejection
of all ecclesiastical, political and economic
absolutes, and that the idea
of original sin supports the balancing and limitation
of all
powers.
Schaeffer says these ideas were realized in colonial America through the mediating influence
of John Locke and John Witherspoon; the principles that took root here were the concept
of a covenant between the ruler,
God and the people that precludes the state from claiming
absolute power, and that all people are equal because they are born sinners.
But I have found him minimally making what seems the obvious statement to be explored, namely, that the doctrine
of omnipotence is the projection onto
God of the wish for
absolute, controlling
power among human beings.
Authors in this camp clearly establish the view that the
power of evil is limited, and that the
power of good (or
God) is the
absolute authority which sets the limits.
As Hartshorne also points out, «The supposition that our
power of «introspection» is
absolute, so that, unless we can consciously detect a factor in an experience it does not contain the factor, is one
of the many forms
of the supposition that man is as
God would be — equipped with infallibility» (CSPM 79).
The
power of God, however, is not that
of absolute omnipotence to do anything.
However this may be, the fact is plain that for contemporary men and women, not only
of a sophisticated sort but also
of quite ordinary attainments, the notion
of God as
absolute power, as unyielding moral dictator, and as metaphysical first cause never Himself affected, has gone dead.
In various combinations and with differing emphases, the concept
of God with which many Christian thinkers have tended to work has been composed
of exactly those ingredients;
absolute power, stark moral demand, and unconditioned (essentially unrelated, in the sense
of a two - way movement) «being - itself» as the ultimate cause
of everything not -
God, but not in anyway affected by that which was not itself — and the neuter here is highly significant, ens realissimum.
So far, what we are encountering is a raw manifestation
of God's unilateral
power, the
absolute might to bring into being — and impose order on — an unresisting cosmos.
This hearkens back to the late medieval discussion about the duality
of God's
absolute power and
God's ordained
power.
6 In view
of this fundamental metaphysical conception
of the relation between
God and the world, Cobb's understanding
of the otherness
of God as
absolute nearness can be seen as a way
of affirming the sovereign and primordial
power of God.
Recognizing that their critique has rendered images
of God no longer
absolute, feminists have discovered that the religious
power structure is reluctant to admit that patriarchal symbols for
God are culturally influenced (as if
God really were male) or contingent (as if use
of a feminine symbol to point to a nonrepresentable
God is more inadequate or idolatrous than use
of a male symbol) To read Mary Daly or Naomi Goldenberg, to consider Rosemary Ruether's demasculinizing
of the Gospel stories or to ponder the renewed attention to «goddess» theology and the development
of a lesbian theology is to see the basic language
of theological discourse upset and transformed.
For Augustinians there is never an
absolute disjunction between intellectual and mystical experience, for all experience has the
power and truth
of God's being as its ground.
Truth
absolute, constant holds
power over the world, follow none truth
absolute God, and live by truth
absolute, way
of Allah, truth
absolute, to have peace among humanity, and dump hinduism, corruption
of truth
absolute religion, handy work
of hindu Jew's, denires
of truth
absolute GOD secular s, Visit limitisthetruth.com to learn hinduism criminality
of hindy Jew's, criminal secular s to hind fool humanity.
Prophetic politics is not only the criticism
of the despotic
powers that have violated the covenant with
God in oppressing the poor and the weak; but also and specially a projection
of the shape
of the Sovereign Rule
of God, which does not allow any
absolute despotic
powers, but which subjugates the
powers into the form
of «Servant» to the Sovereign
God.
What is required is a sense
of being grasped by the
absolute ordering love and
power of God.
That certain concepts
of God, often in the past confused with the classical Christian doctrine
of God, must be destroyed: for example,
God as problem solver,
absolute power, necessary being, the object
of ultimate concern.
In Marxism the law
of dialectical conflict atrophies in an unintroduced period
of static harmony; and in Teilhard, cooperation in grace turns to
absolute reliance upon
God's
power to sustain and perfect that which has been germinating in the noosphere.
Nor do we see, behind what appears to be a kind - hearted philosophy, an utter denial
of any dimension beyond this present observable life,
of any such thing as
absolute right or wrong and
of any
power which might be called
God.
When we have deduced what we deduce by our reason and from study
of visible nature, and then read what we read in His inspired word, and find the two apparently discordant, this is the feeling I think we ought to have on our minds» not an impatience to do what is beyond our
powers, to weigh evidence, sum up, balance, decide, and reconcile, to arbitrate between the two voices
of God» but a sense
of the utter nothingness
of worms such as we are;
of our plain and
absolute incapacity to contemplate things as they really are; a perception
of our emptiness, before the great Vision
of God....