Sentences with phrase «god on a real basis»

Not exact matches

If you can find 2 billion people that believe Zeus is a real god based on it, I «ll promise to read it

I believe in God and in an afterlife, but my belief is purely based on faith, based on what I feel that it must be right, that all the energy that makes a person exist, real, and unique has to be conserved somehow.

Zeus on the other hand has been proven real, he said so himself and he said everyone, all the other gods in other cultures are fakes...» = > upon what are you basing your positive belief (you slipped up there in acknowledging atheism requires a positive disbelief in a diety

Either Jesus was a real man in history who we know absolutely nothing about, due the the Bible's completely innaccurate and conflicting accounts, or he didn't exist at all and was a lesser god that was created based on many of the tenets of the Cult of Osiris.

You obviously talk to God on a regular basis and therefore know he is real.

Christianity is based on faith and still we have a ton of physical evidence that God is real by the world around us and in our personal lives.

YOU want your own brand of «christianity» that bears no relation to the real one, based on Scriptures, the Word of God!

You said, «YOU want your own brand of «christianity» that bears no relation to the real one, based on Scriptures, the Word of God!

Its sad that religion is the gospel of many churchs today rather than a real relationship with Christ based on his grace rather than works.Just as cains offering wasnt acceptable to the Lord its the same for churchs today the Lord is not pleased by our efforts he does nt need our efforts they do not build Gods kingdom nor do mans programmes..

Likewise, if 100 cultures develop religious systems based on a real god I expect them to have a good bit in common, or at least agree on the basics such as the number of gods.

A real and sustained effort was made to reconstruct the whole social order upon the basis of the Law of God, not only by giving it statutory force, but by «writing it on the heart», so far as this could be done by positive instruction and through the ordinances of public worship.

Was it (the) real (one), (the) religion / God (in) which I was seeking (on which I had based my life)?

GW can be a christian yes but there are some people who are catholics and christians and jehovas and atheist and so on that don't understand their wrong doing, saying God is on my side to go ahead and kill millions of innocent woman and children based on lies while the truth is for oil, that's not a real christian in my book, There's plenty of serial killers out there that says they've heard God telling them to kill.

Inevitably, distortions, errors, and prejudices are introduced into the developing images of the self since the experiences on which they are based and the interpretations given to them are extremely unlikely to mirror perfectly the real world (God's perspective).

It seems that the idea of an inclusive church where people are loved and valued based only on the fact that they are a unique creation of God is threatening to those who thing they alone hold the real truth.

All I can say is try to create a real relationship with God by making time to talk with him, not an abstract relationship based on reading a book.

God's free self - giving, or self - relating, adds no perfection to him; rather it gives rise to a real distinction based on the reality of a new relation of opposition.

Yeah yeah, you can say that religion is the way to truth but, logically speaking, believing in a god is the incorrect conclusion to reach based on what we know about religion in general and the incompatability between the religion and the real world.

, That Rylaarsdam's criticism is in part, at least, based on a misunderstanding of Buber's position and a difference in Rylaarsdam's own a priori assumptions is shown by his further statements that «Because of his individual and personal emphasis the notion of an objective revelation of God in nature and history involving the whole community of Israel in the real event of the Exodus does not fit well for him,» that Buber's view of revelation is «essentially mystical and nonhistorical,» and that «the realistic disclosure of Yahweh as the Lord of nature and of history recedes into the background because of an overconcern with the experience of personal relation» — criticisms which are all far wide of the mark, as is shown by the present chapter.)

But the fact that Santa is based on a real person makes belief in him more rational than a belief in gods.

It has its foundation «in the responsibility of Jesus Christ for men, on the basis of our knowledge that the origin, essence and goal of all reality is the real, that is to say, God in Jesus Christ.»

It's that living under law thing that kills us (the Spirit gives life but the letter kills), trying to live up to standards and rules, principles and guidelines, etc... The church these days has pretty much no idea what grace even is, and if you start talking about God's love, I mean his real love based only on Christ's merit, people call you a heretic.

A real conundrum I find with Christians of various theological persuasions is that they harp on how we must be engaged in studying the Bible, how the Bible is our guide in life, and hold the Bible on a pedestal, much like rabbinic Jews hold the Torah or Catholic hold up their Eucharist, but when it comes to the nitty - gritty of how they have come to know God, no matter how they explain it, it ends up being on the basis of experience.

But your conclusions are still based on an @ssumption that god is real... it could have been anything that created something and then died afterwards — that by definition is not a god but rather a living being — perhaps from another dimension which was already created in a similiar fashion.

At any rate real understanding of the problem is precluded if the futurity of the Kingdom is minimized, as by the supposition that belief in the coming Kingdom is based on the firm foundation of belief in the creation, and that the Kingdom of God is simply the consummation of the creation.

atheism is based on the idea the religion is merely a business, no real god exists and therefore they take no part in it.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

I agree with the other reply here: IF there were a god with any real integrity, then he / she / it would probably prefer the honest person who had followed their beliefs (and who had tried to live a «good» life based on those beliefs) than a two - faced shyster who was trying to cover all the bases.

see what you have to understand about living in a real world — a world where god is just a story and not real — its a world based on scientific and physical laws that are proven to exist and their effects are measurable... us as humans, mere animals, hold no real power or control aside thru ingenuity which allows us to change our environment to suit us... stay with me here... at this point in human history we ceased to change to suit our environment and started changing it to suit us — thats destruction of the earth to suit one species — that should go over well...

The boundness to the triune God is the only basis on which changes at the other two levels can take place; without being open towards changes, there can only be an uncommitted factual living next to each other, no real fellowship.

Based solely on the few posts of yours I have read I think you may be interested in the following site: http://freebelievers.com/ Especially as it pertains to your comments to me on wanting to «know the real God, not some fake version we have been taught over the years.»

The God of Abraham which the the major religeons of the world are based on, is just as real as Zeus, Santa Claus, or bigfoot (the is more evidence for bigfoot...).

I happen to think that you have to work harder to make a case that Jesus wasn't based on a real life person, but that isn't any endorsement whatsoever of the idea that he was a god, or could do anything supernatural.

If you believe God and know that He is real, act based on that knowledge and He will find you (sometimes in the most bizarre ways lol), the feeling comes later... but if you do make the decision to follow Christ I strongly suggest you find a church to help you grow in your spiritual walk and to lead you in the right direction.

Hartshorne claims that, since all proofs have premises, Anselm's argument must be based on the assumptions that faith is a real possibility and that the idea of God is free of inconsistencies.

If a couple realise they started their marriage on a poor basis, it does not follow thatthey can reject their marriage vow; it should lead them to seek the grace to ground their relationship in the real freedom of the truth and goodness of their being, lived for God and for each other.

is based on the real - life story of bishop Carlton Pearson, a megachurch pastor in Oklahoma who, in 1998 claimed publicly to his congregation that he heard the voice of God say hell does not exist.

Also noteworthy, in the category of cinema ruled by cultural concerns and actual political events, was Carlos (d. Olivier Assayas), which kept a packed auditorium of critics in their seats for over five hours with a glossy, but intelligent action film version of the 1970s exploits of a terrorist born Illich Ramirez Sanchez, but known internationally as the Jackal, also by the code name Carlos; and Des Hommes et des dieux (Of Gods and Men, Xavier Beauvois), a film, elegantly minimalist in design, based on a real - life encounter between Algerian fundamentalist Islamic terrorists and a community of ascetic Christian monks.

If only PHANTOM THREAD had been based on real life couture god Charles James.

All love is real whether romantic, sexual, brotherly, parental, or based on God's love and sacrifice, agape.

This is not the usual religion book based on the usual and unintelligible Bible studies, but a real study about the real nature of God and the real purpose of our life.

The Godheads themselves are all based on real - life mythological Gods, ranging from Irish folklore to Japanese mythology via the Greeks, and the visual representation of each is akin to their representation in their respective worlds.

About creationists: I don't have any trouble with people believing that God created the world if that helps them facing their existential life questions (anyway I don't know whether science can ever say more about metaphysics than that it doesn't exist, based on the assumption that what can not be perceived by the senses is not real).

Thus the real beginning of western science, i.e. the enlightenment, was based on the tenet that a rational God created an orderly universe that operated according to laws and he populated it with rational beings fashioned in his own image who could study and understand the creation.