Not exact matches
If matter is a perfection
of God, then
God is dependent on matter only in the sense that he is dependent on his own
nature, and the world he creates
out of his
nature is dependent on him, not the other way around.
But if there is a lot
of observable evidene to suggest the possibility
of something beyond
nature, then rejecting it
out right on some presumptous logical high ground seems as counterintutive as those you claim default to
God when they lack understanding.
But let us take action carefully in order that the sickness
of our
nature may be perfectly healed and we thirst to come to
God out of love for Him and hatred
of this life and disgust with ourselves; that is, let us assiduously seek His healing grace.
Forasmuch as each man is a part
of the human race, and human
nature is something social, and has for a great and natural good, the power also
of friendship; on this account
God willed to create all men
out of one, in order that they might be held in their society not only by likeness
of kind, but also by bond
of kindred.
Blessed are the Cheesemakers The Divine
nature of the Bible rings
out resolving the issue
of causation with the first words «In the beginning
God».
The Christian concept
of the People
of God is supranational by
nature, for Christians are called
out of their respective nations to become a new people.
With
God out of the picture, now we have to ask «what in Hell is wrong with human
nature.»
All the decisions
of the consequent
nature flow from the primordial
nature, and though the former does not fit the present actual occasions into a ready - made pattern
of the temporal past (as Ford carefully points
out: IPQ 13:356), yet «the weaving
of Cod's physical feelings upon his primordial concepts (PR 524) amounts to the emergence into time, as predicates
of God's propositional feelings,
of the very valuations
of his nontemporal decision.
God is creator in his capacity
of spinning
out nature: «By Me, Unmanifest in form, all this universe was spun» (IX.
If, as the Scriptures and experience tell us, all men are by
nature in a state
of guilt and depravity from which they are wholly unable to deliver themselves and have no claim whatever on
God for deliverance, it follows that if any are saved
God must choose
out those who shall be the objects
of His grace (Boettner, Predestination, 95).
In fact, there have been a large number
of scientists throughout history who have made major scientific discoveries that have shaped so much
of our knowledge, and they worked
out of desire to learn the truth about the origin and
nature of God's creation.
If people wish to regard homosexuality as a freak
of nature, and even if it is not the condition ordained by
God when He said that it was not good for man that he should be alone, then we can only rejoice that
God is, as ever, bringing good
out of evil.
She articulates a practical way
of living
out what I learned in much
of my faith - changing - books, about the
nature and character
of God, and how we translate that
nature and character to our tinies.
The liberation theologian does not first work
out questions
of the
nature of God and Christ and the church in one context, such as that
of the academic community, and then apply these answers to the social situation.
The whole divine - human experience
of God's taking on human
nature in one person is an exemplar
of suffering that works itself
out in multiple dimensions
of obedience.
There is little appreciation for the
nature of conversion as an ongoing process made up
of many steps forward and backward along the way; or, for marriage as only one option among a couple, or even a few, equally viable, equally «holy» alternatives for living
out one's
God - given vocation... I don't have to dig too deep into my own experience to recognize the hang - ups that this glorification
of marriage and a one - time conversion experience can foster.
concerning his Son, who was born
of the seed
of David [as far as his human
nature went], but who was marked
out as the Son
of God with power [by the holy Spirit] through resurrection from the dead — Jesus Christ our Lord.»
Scripture says that Joshua made the sun stand still, which harmonizes just fine with the Christian tradition that
God can intervene in
nature to suit his purposes, but which triggers all kinds
of red alarms in my brain when I try to sort it
out scientifically.
So you can't figure
out the moronic
nature of an all - powerful
God getting involved in footlball games while ignoring, for instance, the slaughter
of 20 children?
Underlying this erroneous tendency, as Faith has pointed
out many times over the last forty years, is the implicit or explicit denial
of the transcendence
of God, the Divinity
of Christ, the historical objectivity
of revelation and the authority
of the Church in matters
of faith and morals, and also the denial
of the spiritual soul as a principle
of existence that is distinct from yet integrates the material within the unity
of our human
nature.
With all due respect, you can provide no empirical evidence for the «immutable good
nature of god» because, after all, this is an opinion based upon presuppositionalist religious faith (i.e. the cart is way
out in front
of the horse).
By studying the
nature of the process, a scientist might argue that he can make sense
out of the evolutionary process without the postulate
of God.
Storms are not from
God; they are a result
of nature having spun
out of control.
Destruction
of the two cities —
God seeks
out Abraham to intercede on their behalf (this dialog speaks volumes to the
nature of God's judgment); even when ten righteous are not found, he intentionally spares Lot's family, and then at Lot's request spares a small town that would otherwise have been destroyed.
The accusation that the Church by the masculine
nature of the language it has used
of God has for centuries reflected and reinforced a patriarchal society, which has shut
out female forms
of self - representation and seen women in terms
of male desire, is hard to refute.
God does not create like an omnipotent consumer choosing one world
out of an infinity
of possibilities that somehow stand outside
of and apart from his own
nature.
In this way the ontological argument, by drawing
out the presupposition
of metaphysical understanding, indicates that the choice before us is between holding that there is a
God and that «reality» makes sense in some metaphysical manner, whether or not we can ever grasp what that sense is, and holding that there is no
God and that any apparent metaphysical understanding
of reality can only be an illusion which does not significantly correspond to the ultimate
nature of things — unless this «nihilism» be regarded as a kind
of metaphysical understanding instead
of its blank negation.
Minute by minute, the existence
of Israel mocks the pagan
gods, the divine beings who rise
out of the consciousness
of all peoples but which are gentile
gods because they are deifications
of humanity and the forces
of nature rather than the true, living
God of Abraham.
There is no lust in christ but just an infinite source
of the love
of the spirit that's pure and delightful.Marriage itself is a concession to the weakness
of our present being.
God designed woman as the companion of man with complimentary attributes.I could justify all kinds of sin through the fact that I'm bonded to them.we were slaves of sin as Paul tells us.I couldn't come out of sin with all my efforts Jeremy.We have a sinful nature.But, Sin never provides life because the spirit of god is love and life to us.When I cried out to God to save me from this nature, God did by his grace.Now, I detest sin having tasted love of chri
God designed woman as the companion
of man with complimentary attributes.I could justify all kinds
of sin through the fact that I'm bonded to them.we were slaves
of sin as Paul tells us.I couldn't come
out of sin with all my efforts Jeremy.We have a sinful
nature.But, Sin never provides life because the spirit
of god is love and life to us.When I cried out to God to save me from this nature, God did by his grace.Now, I detest sin having tasted love of chri
god is love and life to us.When I cried
out to
God to save me from this nature, God did by his grace.Now, I detest sin having tasted love of chri
God to save me from this
nature,
God did by his grace.Now, I detest sin having tasted love of chri
God did by his grace.Now, I detest sin having tasted love
of christ.
If we accept the OT represents
God's
nature... then we must accept that He is the kind
of God who will commit genocide
of entire civilizations, slaughter innocent children for the sin
of their parents, kill thousands
of His own chosen people simply because they complained He was killing too many
of them, would literally wipe
out every man woman and innocent child on the face
of the earth save one family and then later regret it.
I know there are going to be a bunch
of people
out there that scream that
God can do anything and could create a sinless Child, but you can not ignore the HUMAN
nature of Jesus, so unless
God created something other than human, and then placed it in Mary's womb, he inherited his human
nature from his mother and thus inherited the Original Sin.
The first function
of the affirmation that I belong to
God is to combat all idolatries, including religious idolatry, to oppose my innate tendency to erect a false absolute
out of that which is essentially relative, and to place a «No Thoroughfare» sign against the roads which turn
nature into Nature, humanity into Humanity and myself into M
nature into
Nature, humanity into Humanity and myself into M
Nature, humanity into Humanity and myself into Myself.
I in no way accept that these stories
of God's wrath poured
out upon the innocent represents any type
of reality regarding the
nature of God.
It need not search
out the
nature of the undertakings
God has appointed for it and then struggle to confirm its desires, intentions, choices, promises, and undertakings to those appointed ends.
A feeling
of guilt so
out of proportion with what my life was, is it inscribed in the
nature of every child born into this world (the moral law within us, according to Kant, attests the existence
of God), or is it a deformation occurring in infancy, imposed upon the Christians
of my kind, and which I have not known how to cure?
Since the Catholic theologian Schillebeeckx basically ruled
out prophecies by concluding
God does not know the future, one can rule
out the infallible
nature of this verse.
Thus, once more we return to the necessity
of God's prehending the temporal world in order to carry
out a function attributed to the primordial
nature.
I'm sorry if I went on at quite a length at this, but I hope I impressed that this is a serious and deep issue in the understanding
of the
nature of God, some might not be in any position to accept it as true, but it is not to be rejected
out of hand as a silly or tricky little thing that people are foolish for falling into believing.
For a long time now the Christian understanding
of man has been obscured by theories
of his
nature built on other dogmas than that
of the sovereignty
of God and constructed
out of observations
of his behavior made from other points
of view than those
of Christian faith.
If one were the type to be depressed at the thought that the sun will run
out of energy some day and our planet become an empty chunk
of rock, then I should think one would derive cold comfort in the thought that even at that time
God will prehend the present as objectified in his consequent
nature!
6) I have already given several verses showing the sin - bearing
nature of Jesus» cross, I just want to point
out again Romans 3:25 & 26:
God presented Christ as a sacrifice
of atonement, through the shedding
of his blood — to be received by faith.
In yesterday's post we saw that Scripture and theology seems to indicate that in some way humans were enabled by
God to guide and control natural forces, but when we sinned, we lost this ability, and
nature spun
out of control.
God pushes through
nature and history to that earthly consummation in which spirit and
nature will be unified, the profane sanctified, the kingdom
of God established
out of the kingdom
of man, and all
of time and creation drawn back into eternity.
And this love is characterized, once again, as qualifying the
nature of God's power: «Not that you, Divine Omnipotence and Eternal Wisdom, gave unwillingly, as though compelled by some sort
of necessity, but rather that you freely bestowed your love,
out of the boundless flood
of your loving generosity, upon an unworthy and ungrateful creature.»
While classification freed directors to use explicit language in marvelous films like Platoon and Something Wild and has allowed films like
Out of Africa and Children
of a Lesser
God to explore the complex
nature of human sexuality, it has also given us a series
of slasher films — Friday the 13th, with its many parts; The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, parts one and two — and films like Brian DePalma's artistically significant but deplorably explicit Body Double.
The cosmic enterprise is like a great adventure, in which deity moves
out towards the creatures — not as if it were only an incidental or accidental act
of God, but because
God by very necessity
of the divine
nature itself is constantly outgoing, self - identifying, receptive, and responsive.
Or is anything in
nature that seems to act as an efficient cause only carrying
out the causality
of God, with no agency
of its own?
Yet the Christian affirms that
God is distilling love, goodness, truth, beauty, and righteousness
out of the changes and chances
of nature and human existence.
I recall that I often felt closer to
God and sensed the beauty
of nature when I took the dog for a walk than I did at long - drawn -
out church services.
Tommy
God has already forgiven you for your sin the moment you asked Jesus into your life and confessed him as Lord.From that point he paid for your sin in full past present future.It is not sin that stops us from being with the Lord so you are saved.The problem you are experiencing is the battle for your life in the here and now satan is
out to destroy you and he knows our weaknesses.If you are honest there were already issues in your life that you struggled with and never got the victory over.So where do you go from here as i found myself in the same situation i was a christian but walking according to the flesh.
God does nt change his mind he always loves us but because
of our choices we distance ourselves from
God.The issue is that we like sin thats our wicked hearts and to be fair we cant change our
nature only Christ can do that our old
nature must be crucified with Christ.The stumbling block is our pride we have to admit that we cant do it For me that was terribly difficult i was so independent thinking i could do anything but the truth was a made a real mess
of things.I sense you are at a crossroads and are feeling desperate and confused.So as a brother in the Lord you need to confess your sin to
God and tell him that you are weak -LCB- we all are -RCB- and that you cant do it in your strength -LCB- None
of us can -RCB- but ask him to send the holy spirit to help you deal with the temptations and the sin that you struggle with and he will help you to change your life he will empower you as he did me.Rather than look at who you are look to Christ and walk in him and he will make you a new man and sin will not have dominion over you.Jesus came to set us free from bondage.Having once been a slave to sin i know what it is like to have been set free by the power
of God and that is what Christ is offering you today.All it takes is a desire to change or repent and admit we cant do it and trust him to give you the strength to walk in him regards brentnz