Sentences with phrase «god present proof»

«The experiences of others» is particularly tricky, why does God present proof of his existence to some, but not others?

Not exact matches

I am so sorry that you have been told / taught such awful things about Jesus, but whether or not you believe He is fully man and also fully God, there is more than enough proof historically and in present scripture to show that labeling Him as a mysogonist and an advocate for murder is a drastically false account of who He is and what He stood for.

Non-believers would gladly change their minds should proof of a god's existence be presented.

â $ œIt would seem unfair for God to present proof of His existence only to some and then judge the rest for not believing.

It would seem unfair for God to present proof of His existence only to some and then judge the rest for not believing.

«To these He also presented Himself alive after His suffering, by many convincing proofs, appearing to them over a period of FORTY DAYS and speaking of the things concerning the kingdom of God.»

And so the evidence that Christians continue to present as «proof» of their god is either the earliest fragments of these same man - written stories (proving nothing other than that someone wrote the stories down!)

and I am perfectly healthy and am real life proof that God is prophetic and sovereign and present right now.

Ben... if you have evidential proof of the existence of your god, by all means, present it.

I give to you what I give to no one else, and that is my seed, my procreative power, which, united to your seed, can incarnate our love, take on flesh that will be the living fruit of our love, the proof also that we want our love to be a gift to God and to the future.1 I have expanded on this at length elsewhere.2 Holding to our present topic, let us look a bit more closely at those issues of justice involved in this divine plan of the union of man and woman in marriage.

But I, as a believer, do not have God the way I possess an object, so as to have it in my power to present the object to one who wants proof.

If you have have proof that God does not exist, present it.

If you were to present a proof of the existence of God you'd be the first to do so.

the proof of Gods presence in us is not limited to the material or biological evolutionary development only, but most important scientific proof is the effect of His will in historical development of the world.A computer program now used and tested a powerful machine by inputing all recorded events in history during the last hundreds years and found out that it has a purpose and not random.Meaning that an intelligent being could have influence it.It is now presumed by the religious observers that it could be His will.The process now is under improvement, because the computers is not powerl enough the deluge of information and data since the beginning of history, some analyst believes that in them near future if the Quantum computers which is much powerful than the present coventional will be used, then dramatic results and confirmation will be at hand.

This proof texting takes those moments and presents them as our relationship with God.

God can present Himself to humans and that is direct observational proof.

You said, «God can present Himself to humans and that is direct observational proof.»

Neville i agree with you Jesus has the power to forgive sin past present and future through the cross when he died his death covered past present and future.If those in the old testament were justified by faith and made righteous then they are covered by the blood of Jesus even though he hadn't died for them yet because there hope was in God.Isn't that what the definition of faith is it is the substance of things hoped for the evidence of things unseen.The proof is Enoch how could he go to be with God if he was not righteous and only the blood of Jesus is able to do that.

Instead they (atheists) simply don't believe any of the god claims that have been put forth (this requires no proof on their part), and * may * claim that they are convinced some god concepts that have been presented to them do not exist (this requires supporting argument).»

The burden of proof remains with those making the claim that god exists, and you have not presented any such proof.

Instead they simply don't believe any of the god claims that have been put forth (this requires no proof on their part), and * may * claim that they are convinced some god concepts that have been presented to them do not exist (this requires supporting argument).

Although not in themselves proof of the existence of God, the Shroud of Turin and the portrait of Our Lady of Guadeloupe present phenomena that scientists have yet to resolve despite numerous examinations by skeptics.

Luke had been at pains to make clear that the risen Jesus was no otherworldly spirit but a physical form with flesh and bones, 42 who consequently presented his disciples with infallible proofs.41 The risen Christ came to be regarded as having conducted a fresh ministry with his disciples, and in these forty days he «taught them about the kingdom of God».41 But since the experience of the risen Christ was not of this character at the end of the century when Acts was written, it had to be made clear that this kind of experience was brought to an end by a new event, the Ascension.

God revealed himself through actual miracles in Jesus for a short period of time with the express purpose fulfilling prophecy and presenting the Jew and Gentile proof that Christ is who He claims to be.

Given current lack of evidence for proof of anything supernatural, will there be leniency for those who simply and honestly claim, «I don't know», granted there is a supernatural, and that the Christian God is the true God who did present us with an ultimatum to accept him or not, expecting us to wage the eternal fate of our soul?

Even if, however, all the contextual and exegetical material presented above is wrong, and this verse does in fact teach that God ordained these particular Gentiles to receive eternal life (which the arguments above show He did not), this verse is still not a good proof - text for the Calvinistic doctrine of Unconditional Election.

Far more proof has been presented scientifically about evolution and the big bang theory than by believing in a god.

One day I was presenting the gospel message in the best way I knew how and came to the point where I asserted that the supreme proof that the message of God is true rests in the fact that God raised Jesus Christ from the dead.

Given I and millions have personally experienced these transforming truths as written in the Bible and given there is no proof that anything in the Bible is not as presented there is no logical reason to doubt the Bible is not the word of God translated so that we can begin the journey.

Are you stating that you just have not found or been presented proof so you find yourself unsure of the existance of God?

My guess is that if Jesus returned today and presented himself to all the Christians saying he was the Son of God... most Christians would want... proof... -LRB-; ^ >)

Thus if true proof of the existence of God is presented in the here and now to believers, they will flog it, scourge it, and crucify it in an instant by whatever means.

There are not just six proofs for God's present existence, there are proofs for his past and future existence as well.

Now is my opinion a realist if provided with proof would believe in a god, though I'm sure if a atheist was presented with definitive proof they would to.

No valid proof has ever been presented for the existence of god.

When it comes to the gods presented by various believers, atheism AND agnosticism (the two go together, usually as they are not mutually exclusive positions — a grandmother can also be a wife) is the most sensible stance until proof can be evaluated..

Since President Obama was forced to offer up his birth certificate I don't think it is so absurd of a though to ask the political candidates to present some form of proof that god has call upon the specifically to run this country.

Nii - Don't waste your time with the Atheists, when presented with proof on God they say you are twisting things to suit the Bible.

I will not believe in a god until I am presented with proof.