Sentences with phrase «god question in this case»

The where is God question in this case is used as an argument against God: if he is who you say he is, why would this happen?

Not exact matches

Providentially minded critics of American imperialism could as easily make the case that God in his providence is radically anti-American, that American failures and setbacks are manifestations of God's judgment on the U.S. Webb is aware of these questions but seems not to entertain them seriously.

You'll almost certainly dodge that question by claiming he has always existed, so if that's the case, what suddenly prompted God to create a universe filled with over 100 billion galaxies containing a trillion trillion stars after spending an eternity extending into the past existing alone in an absolute void of nothingness?

Rogers supports his first contention by exemplifying his suggested way of reading and by choosing a particularly knotty case» interpreting Thomas on the natural knowledge of God by reading the first question in the Summa Theologica from Thomas» exegesis of Romans 1, instead of the other way around.

In any case, the major debate about the first question was whether the Logos was a creature or was truly God.

In conclusion, even though Hartshorne himself questions divine relativity in the case of inferior emotions and ignorance, we have seen that, for any particular experience, the assertion that the relative nature of God knows that experience by feeling it in exactitude is unwarranteIn conclusion, even though Hartshorne himself questions divine relativity in the case of inferior emotions and ignorance, we have seen that, for any particular experience, the assertion that the relative nature of God knows that experience by feeling it in exactitude is unwarrantein the case of inferior emotions and ignorance, we have seen that, for any particular experience, the assertion that the relative nature of God knows that experience by feeling it in exactitude is unwarrantein exactitude is unwarranted.

Doug Sloan makes a case for the opposite, but that calls into question the benevolence and omniscience of a god who would send such confusing and conflicting directives to his creations in the first place or for sending such messages that could be «lost» after millemnia of translations.

Once I noticed that people were claiming to believe in God just in case there is hell (cowardice in my opinion) is when I started questioning my old religion and eventually not believing in it.

In any case, Jesus» question implies that they are casting out demons by the power of God.

And in that case the question as to whether God would be in any way different if He did not know what He does know would not arise.

David Berg of the Children of God having been one case in question.

It is out of the question to try to grasp God through sight (which is the equivalent of reducing truth to reality), to claim that what one sees can be God (in this case one converts reality into truth), or to make a representation of something in the spiritual realm (which is the same as consecrating a religion, since religions always belong to the visual realm).

In this case, Whitehead's philosophy may have the virtue of picturing the theistic issue exactly as it seems to be — with the question of God's existence an open one to be decided on grounds other than those of systematic necessity.99

In the case of Islam and Mormonism, these arguments center upon the character of the inspired text in question, as something dictated directly by God (through angelic mediation) and itself miraculous or as encompassed by miracleIn the case of Islam and Mormonism, these arguments center upon the character of the inspired text in question, as something dictated directly by God (through angelic mediation) and itself miraculous or as encompassed by miraclein question, as something dictated directly by God (through angelic mediation) and itself miraculous or as encompassed by miracles.

It turns on a crucial distinction: «the example of our Saviour, who refused meddling» in cases where questions who rightly holds the authority that comes from God alone.

The question under debate is whether the character of Job is here intentionally represented as affirming faith that he will achieve his justification with God in life beyond death; or whether the redeemer is in the original sense of the word (in Hebrew, go'el), the kinsman who, in this case, succeeds in ultimately exonerating Job.

In the case of the nations in question that were utterly destroyed by God, it isn't a few citizens that imperiled the manIn the case of the nations in question that were utterly destroyed by God, it isn't a few citizens that imperiled the manin question that were utterly destroyed by God, it isn't a few citizens that imperiled the many.

For in this case he knows more of God than the so - called believer who regards God as a question which he has long settled to his own satisfaction.

Tough question but in most cases evil men are running those countries we are at odds with and allowing them to have power would not be in the best interest of God loving people on this earth.

This is particularly the case with a myth which, with all its other disadvantages is outspokenly pragmatist and propagandist in character, and which ignores the question of truth to such an extent that it no longer exists even in untruth, but in a chilly no - man's - land between God and the devil.

In answer to this question he says that no one can put the blame on God in cases where women murder their children because of illicit pregnancIn answer to this question he says that no one can put the blame on God in cases where women murder their children because of illicit pregnancin cases where women murder their children because of illicit pregnancy.

In any case it seems to me that there are times when we have no choice but to follow the dictates of our conscience, to throw ourselves on God's mercy and not ask too many questions.

I believe God is also asking us the why question (in His case He knows the answer) He continues to seek, search out the lost and continues to knock on our hearts door.

The answer to these questions, it will turn out, has in each case to do with the reversed polarity of God.

Why can't people for God sake understand the angle the young man was coming from, this is a guy who has come out to suggest what he feel will be of great glory to the team, futbol is about winning trophy not the samba, champaign, tick taka or jambody style Of playwill be accredited to ur cv after retirement, every professional player will wants to be identify with a medal, mind you he have limited years to his career, therefore we should not allow sentment or affections we have for our various teams erode the basic objective of the game.we should also think about their future too, this guys are proffessionals which young lads are looking up to and questions will be ask tomorrow about theirs playing days.can people tell me why pele and some other famous players in the world both present and past are been celebrated today the answer is simply cos they are successful in their career and have trophy to show for it in their respective clubs or countries, why the complain in nigeria?its simply cos our team for quite a while now has not recorded any troph to her glory, fans should learn how to call a spade a spade in order to balance situation and also for better performance of the team.why then did arsene wenger hurridly went to buy more experienced players after the poor outing he had at the beggining of last season?this players know beta cos they are at the centre of it all, we don't have to trash what they say, we fans are only watching from screen, in as much as we beliv in arsen wenger, we should also know that without the boys no arsen wenger, fans should try to reason along with the players too.an hypotetical cases of similar to rvp has been tested by some players and have put them right over the coach and the team.so, whatelse does the fans needs to prove that futbol has gone beyond living in the past.for example, fabrigas and nasri were able to prove their critics wrong.thank God for them, we should always be objective in our submission, how else do we expect players to show their commitment to a team that was in 8 on the log table and later fought their way back to 3rd this boys are commendable and deserve to be encouraged, I think is high time the manager and the mgt board of arsenal futbol team get to know that game of futbol has gone beyond two teams domination, its now like a pendilum which can swing either way only with a powerful insrument called money.you can't eat ur cake and have.

And in both cases, we are left with the reductio ad absurdum question of what came before the multiverse or God.

As with Berg's film and HBO's television documentary Mea Maxima Culpa: Silence In The House Of God (2012), which explore similar cases in Northern California and Wisconsin, Spotlight raises questions about Church - run «treatment centres» and the role of wider celibacy issues on its attitude to self - preservatioIn The House Of God (2012), which explore similar cases in Northern California and Wisconsin, Spotlight raises questions about Church - run «treatment centres» and the role of wider celibacy issues on its attitude to self - preservatioin Northern California and Wisconsin, Spotlight raises questions about Church - run «treatment centres» and the role of wider celibacy issues on its attitude to self - preservation.

The students not only asked Mr. Newdow to describe the case, but they also asked him the following question: «aside from your belief that recitations of the current version of the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools in the United States should be declared unconstitutional because of its inclusion of the phrase «under God,» do you also believe that the phrase «in God we trust» should be removed from our paper currency?»

When legal academe instead chooses to evaluate how judges have conformed to the academics» personal opinions — and worse, to their belief systems — as I have seen happen in critical discussions among law professors of the Wagar case and, god help us, of the very legally correct Ghomeshi decision as if it were regrettable, it is legal academe that is being arrogant, not the judges in question.