Sentences with phrase «god than a proof»

Not exact matches

I am so sorry that you have been told / taught such awful things about Jesus, but whether or not you believe He is fully man and also fully God, there is more than enough proof historically and in present scripture to show that labeling Him as a mysogonist and an advocate for murder is a drastically false account of who He is and what He stood for.

I was more devout than you yet I have yet to see any proof of your «god's» existence anywhere throughout the universe.

This is stronger proof for the existence of the tooth fairy, rather than god which does nothing.

If you require atheists to explain something physics directly tells you we can't talk about right now, your burden of proof for atheism is oddly far more extreme than your burden of proof for «god».

As for the one god being more valid than any of the other thousands, that things you attribute to him (technically to Jesus), still haven't been proven in anything outside of the bible, which no one of a scientific mind can accept as convincing proof.

I have seen much more proof of GOD than than I have of scietific «fact» Gods word hasn't changed in 6000 years.

If evidence emerges, then of course that sentiment will change, but until there is proof, there is no reason to believe that your god is any more real than Zeus or Thor.

With faith in your heart, you do not need to pursue proof or empirical evidence through human means which you will never find because God Is Spirit, thus, so much greater than mortal men which He created who have limited knowledge.

Loving one another (family specifically) unconditionally and teaching love by example is far more of a noble focus than spending much of our time obsessing over and trying to please a god whom there is zero proof of existence.

To test the thesis of the power of prayer and the notion that learning is product «God's gifts» rather than humanity's strivings, pray for a proof, disproof or proof of the undecidability of the Riemann hypothesis.

Yet you have no proof of God's existence other than the trite «look at the sun, look at the pretty flowers, look at the ocean, of course you can see God.»

FairySea, there is more evidence for the Loch Ness Monster than there is for God, and evidence is not proof.

And so the evidence that Christians continue to present as «proof» of their god is either the earliest fragments of these same man - written stories (proving nothing other than that someone wrote the stories down!)

It sort of puts pompous religious declarations into perspective when you realize that there is more proof for Sasquatch than there is for god.

I know who I have believed and am persuaded that he is able to keep that which I have committed to him until that day.I have all the proof i need, and God is more real than you are or will ever be.

There is as much proof (more so in some cases) that Big Foot, the Loch Ness Monster and backside probing aliens exist than there is of gods.

That is your first mistake because you can not provide me with a reasonable explanation for a divine creators existence) and the fact that we exist is not anymore a reason for the proof of the existence of an anthropomorphic god than it proves the existence of, in Richard Dawkins terms, the flying spaghetti monste.

if the Christian god had all the omnipotence his followers proclaimed, he would have designed our brains more like sheep or lemmings, rather than giving us smart inquisitive minds that look for proof... and then not give us any proof.

Nor will you ever get any «proof» Niknak... other than maybe a lighting bolt and a voice from the heavens which are incredibly rare The belief in any god is based upon faith and faith can not be proven.

Strong belief in God or in the doctrines of a religion, based on spiritual apprehension rather than proof.»

You have no more proof of your god than any other follower of any other god.

When Ezra cries, «Thou our God hast punished us less than our iniquities deserve,» (Daniel 9:16) or a prayer in the Book of Nehemiah says, «Thou art just in all that is come upon us; for thou hast dealt truly, but we have done wickedly,» (Nehemiah 9:33) or Daniel exhausts tautology in confessing, «We have sinned, and have dealt perversely, and have done wickedly, and have rebelled,» (Daniel 9:5) we see the self - accusation which resulted from the acceptance of national misfortune not as an evidence of Yahweh's weakness in protecting his people but as proof of his inflexible righteousness.

the proof of Gods presence in us is not limited to the material or biological evolutionary development only, but most important scientific proof is the effect of His will in historical development of the world.A computer program now used and tested a powerful machine by inputing all recorded events in history during the last hundreds years and found out that it has a purpose and not random.Meaning that an intelligent being could have influence it.It is now presumed by the religious observers that it could be His will.The process now is under improvement, because the computers is not powerl enough the deluge of information and data since the beginning of history, some analyst believes that in them near future if the Quantum computers which is much powerful than the present coventional will be used, then dramatic results and confirmation will be at hand.

I find burnt toast to be great for a hangover, which is obviously proof that the judeo - christian god does indeed exist and created everything in the universe thousands of years ago in perfect order, even though there are trees older than the universe...

This week we've come closer than ever to proving that a big band happened so that's proof that some god did that.

Their is more proof (scientific) that God exists than there is that he does not.

topher: where is this much promised proof that those ware «god's laws» rather than the translated, edited hearsay of iron age sheep boinkers?

People's «god» and the proof of it's existance is no better than any «proof» of the existance of Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy.

Atheists don't have to prove that a god exists, anymore than you require proof that invisible pink unicorns don't exist.

You are applying human characteristics to a divine being, that doesn't work.God is more complex than that, you are running a shell game and calling it reason, you are, in this instance and for the cited reason, wrong.God is not a man, his ways are so far above mans ways, they can not be comprehended.You can not reduce God, and cite that as proof.

Too bad that there is not one single shred of proof that your god or any god exists, and there is not an ounce of proof that your bible is anything more than a book of fables written by bronze age men.

There is more proof to show that people are born gay than there is proof of any god.

Also, there is more proof that people are born gay than there is proof the support the existence of any god.

There is more evidence to indicate that homosexuality is innate than there is proof of god.

There is more proof that hom.os.exuality is determined in the womb than there is proof of any god.

This is not proof of the existance of God anymore than Aesop's fables are proof of talking foxes.

Also, atheism does use faith, you have faith that there is no god (s), you can't prove your point more than religious people can prove theirs, so there is no facts, no proof either way.

It is this misunderstand and lack of knowledge that leads people to contemplate and assert the existence of god with no real proof or evidence other than a sacred collection of texts written over the last few thousand years.

That's a far cry from being closed minded to the concept, but it is unlikely we will ever have more proof of god than there is that mankind was farted from the butt of a cosmic water buffalo.

Evil is a tag we put on an action, it is not proof of God or the Devil or of Demons or Boogy Men any more than my missing socks are proof that gnomes steal them.

Perhaps, though, the biblical character of Jesus, rather than being entirely mythical, was based on one of many Jewish messiah claimants who had followers who euhemerized his life to a greater extent than those of other such claimants, so that in time the stories were so embellished that he became a god in them, but the Tesimonium Flavianum is hardly proof of his existence.

Nuland calls himself «a confirmed skeptic,» but says of God: «Nothing would please me more than proof of His existence, and of a blissful afterlife, too.»

The lack of proof for the nonexistence of a god does not prove a god exists, any more than a lack of proof for the nonexistence of a planet somewhere in the universe made entirely of chocolate pudding proves that such a planet exists.

What could have inspired these men to willingly die as martyrs preaching peace and forgiveness from God through Jesus Christ and preaching the invitation from Jesus Christ to call God «Our Father in Heaven» by means of the Holy Spirit among us other than the historical reality of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead — proof that Jesus is both God and Man?

The best proof of existence this god has is a compilation of old stories, some of them fantastic in nature, but no more so than in any mythology.

And through all the verbiage, there still is no proof that god or heaven exist other than in the minds of those who do not seek the truth.

Rather than seeing it as a book of proof texts, it helps us see what God has been doing in the world, and what our role might be in carrying the story forward.

None of those gods had any more validity or proof of their existence than the modern ones but those who believed in them believed just as fervently.

The traditional philosophical «proofs» for God — the cosmological, the teleological and the ontological — err in that they argue for the existence, for the limited reality, of an excluding God, rather than for the unlimited reality of an including God.

God can not and shows no proof of existence other than works created by man.