Not exact matches
> What he did is no different than what the Council fo Nicea did when they created «The word of
God»... no??? Men decided and wrote what they thought the word of god was... present christians faith is based on thi
God»... no???
Men decided and wrote what they thought the word of
god was... present christians faith is based on thi
god was... present christians faith is based on this..
Now
men who know more than
God [sarcasm]
decide they don't like that saying, and it doesn't fit in their thinking, so off they go and write books and develope a following of other people who don't like the truth of what Jesus said.
Hardly, after
man came up with then disregarded as utter nonsense the previous 10,000 or so
gods in existence, we
decided not to jump on the current bandwagon claiming salvation for the believer and damnation for the rest... Pray tell, what became of all the people who had never the chance to hear of his words / deeds after he came and died?
However, those teachings are no longer viable as
man has
decided that those teachings by
God are not ethical thus man is more ethical than g
God are not ethical thus
man is more ethical than
godgod.
In short,
God allowed Israel's destruction as a judgement against their faithlessness; then almost 2000 years later,
Man decides to recreate it in some misguided sense of justice due to the suffering the Jews felt at the hands of Nazis.
Just like in abortion and euthanasia; that is
man deciding, not
God.
Your
god finally changed his mind in the mid 1800's and
decided that black
men should vote too — but not any women.
If there is a
God and there is just as much for as against, But lets say there is a
God and he made everything Including you and He gets to make the rules because lets face it hes a lot bigger then you, So unfortunately he only wants those who believe in him based on the information given, Lets look at the facts based on the Book,, Some of his own angels turned on him and they see him every day... That had to hurt, So he
decides With
man he only wants those with the faith to believe based on His book and faith found thru the holy spirit, If you refuse to believe then he cant use you, cant trust you, so he will choose to toss you aside, Hey I understand It ai nt fair, Your important, Your Smart, But unfortunately hes bigger then you and he has the Juice, You either play by the rules or wait and see what not believing leads too.
So your
god is so fragile that he lashes out at a single
man that
decides he wants to maybe see what else is out there?
And so I have
decided to go to Jerusalem, where
God was seen as
man and spoke with
men and to adore the place where his feet trod» (p.104 - 5) These examples bring the characters — and by extension, their history — to life.
A
man at the end of his rope
decides to hope against all the odds, to remember the Rock when he feels himself to have been left in the dust: «For I shall again praise him, my help and my
God.»
Both held that
God, not
man,
decides who will be saved.
As
god,
man decides who lives and who dies.
For most
men cling to this world, and do not muster energy to
decide wholly for
God.
However, there is a certain point when time ends and all
men have finally
decided either to love
God or reject him, when every knee will bow either because of love or because they are forced, that eternal suffering as a sentence on mankind is questionable in my mind.
After the fall of
man,
God lifted that protection over us because we had
decided to step away from
God.
How are you so certain those are the words of
god and not just some
men who were on a power trip and
decided that making up stories and fooling people was as easy way to earn some fast cash and make people worship you?
Moreover, a
man can never absolve himself and
decide with certainty whether his daily sins which he must acknowledge do not hide a radical No to
God, even though he hopes that they do not exclude him from the kingdom of
God.
I wish people would accept that the «Bible» is not
gods word neither was it wrote by
god but by
men who put what they
decided they wanted as rules for everyone else to run their life based on, every thing from what type of fabric you can wear at the same time to what you can eat on certain days.
In the story of Sodom, in Genesis 18,
God had ALREADY
decided to destroy the city BEFORE the attempted rape of the angels — which incidentally was perpetrated mainly by heterosexuals since ALL the
men of the city were involved, and we know that throughout history, gays have only represented about 10 % of the population.
Of course
man is all powerful, depending on the culture and the multiple
gods, it is
man who
decides what powers they have in their culture.
Some group of clergy who met back in Nice on several occasions over 1500 years ago because they couldn't agree on the nature of
God, and that was causing such a rift in the church established at the time that they had to put it to a vote to
decide what doctorine to follow, and then ended up excommunicating anybody who didn't believe that
man had the right to
decide the true nature of
God?
What is should read is that»
man has decided without evidence that god «created»... all the rest is equally man created ideology based on what MAN DID NOT UNDERSTA
man has
decided without evidence that
god «created»... all the rest is equally
man created ideology based on what MAN DID NOT UNDERSTA
man created ideology based on what
MAN DID NOT UNDERSTA
MAN DID NOT UNDERSTAND.
Believing there was a
God, and knowing the truth could be found in the bible (remember all those quotes) I
decided to by pass the middle
man.
Today as i was thinking about Jesus sending the demons into the pigs and i thought
God is not punishing but judging and he made a decision.This idea came from your other discussion which i believe is what he does he
decides to make a judgement call he is sovereign and it shows his tender heart and mercy that not a single person was afflicted.The pigs unlike
men have no soul so have no eternal consequence upon them they live and they die.either way they were going to get killed.We can be assured that
Gods judgements are right and just the pork was going to the gentile nations who worshipped other
Gods and no doubt would have been offered to idols so there is a consequence when we disobey the Laws of
God even even when we do nt know or understand his laws.brentnz
Gothard's teachings involve rules upon rules all dealing with the outward, dress, hair, smiling, bright eyes, no birth control or dating, no higher education for girls who must stay in the home until the father
decides what they should do, how
God blesses and is happy with you if you do such and such, so many rules, those who really wanted to please
God were under the weight of things they could never accomplish... plus the male regime and women having to be careful not to defraud
men by their dress or looks made it so easy for sexual predatory behaviors to take hold and the woman at fault for the
man's problems and such... ARGH!!!!!!!!!!!! No wonder some of the children of this regime became athiests.
I am perpetually fighting against straw
men in this blog, where so many act like the OT Israelites just got bored, and
decide, out of the blue to make up «scape - goating» to engage in genocide in the name of
God.
Hmmm, well let's see Cheddar, (if that is your real name), since the
men in the story
decided to give credit to
God, who are you to deny?
Paul, in contrast to Jesus, represents a
decided turning away from the Biblical conception of the kingship of
God and the immediacy between
God and
man.
As Ogden indicates, this can be expressed in nonmythological language: «Jesus» office as the Christ consists precisely in his being the bearer, through word and deed and tragic destiny, of the eternal word of
God's love, which is the transcendent meaning of all created things and the final event before which
man must
decide his existence.»
We
decide our eternal destiny through the choices we make before
God and
man.
Maybe
Man decided it meant everyone, cause that sounds a lot nicer, but
God has a different idea.
I believe In
God, i don't believe any
man has the power to forgive me, that is for
God to
decide.
Nietzsche wrote that as soon as
Man decided that he had invented
God and began to interpret
God's word, then
God was dead and was killed by
Man.
In the fourteenth century, a
man named John Wycliffe
decided that
God's Word should be available to all people, and so he translated the Bible from Latin into English.
«I believe it is the letter of the law that brings death, meaning the law passed down to Moses from
God... Tell me, who
decides what part of the Bible is of
God and so infallible, and what part of it is of
man and so fallible.
It was not that he
decided to deny
God and choose
man and his freedom, (This is how Berdyaev reads Ivan, and he is prompted to describe Ivan's brain - fever as the necessary result of choosing freedom without
God.
One thing seems to be noteworthy: even the true freedom of choice, that is the freedom which consists not only in the absence of external compulsion but in the fact that
man must freely
decide about himself, and which is, therefore, a demand rather than «freedom» — this freedom becomes evident only in Christianity, because only there each individual is eternally valid (in the personal love between
God and
man) and hence must realize himself in perfect responsibility and thus in freedom.
Now, if a
man decides he is going to start killing people and moves forward with that thought and commits murder after murder - is it not the duty of a just and loving
God to protect those people who cry out to him for help from this evil
man?
In response to
God and
man, each individual must
decide how to divide his time, how to use his power, and how to channel his work toward constructive ends.
You said, «In short you just want
man to
decide morality not
God.»
The morality that you think your
god decided, was in fact
decided by
men.
It therefore lays before
men, as few NT books do, the necessity to
decide for or against
God.
Cuz we know
God, in his infinite wisdom,
decided that
man should not eat during daylight hours during this particular time of the year to show how much you love him / her / it.
LinCA In short you just want
man to
decide morality not
God.
Instead of the Power whom
man obeys and for whom he
decides, he knows only the law of his own spiritual being, and the idea of
God becomes «the irreducible coefficient of moral processes in self - consciousness.»
«It would be a strange freedom that would leave
man neutral, able equally to choose,
decide, and act rightly or wrongly» (The Humanity of
God, p. 76) The sinner is not free; the sinner is a slave of death, and death is the termination of all decisions, be they free or enslaved.
The Rapture will be a real event, but
MAN can not interpret the day or hour only
God decides when Jesus is to return.
Whoever you
decide to vote for in this election, be sure you have made the decision with a heart set towards pleasing
God, not
man.
We are a «becoming,» we are also a «belonging,» since we share in the common human life — «no
man is an island entire unto itself,» said John Donne in a famous passage — and what we
decide affects others and also affects
God.