Sentences with phrase «gods good side»
He is quite sure that he is on Gods good side.
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/ Not exact matches
One side does not believe this... the other side does, yet still science can still be done for the good of others... either way God is glorified...
IE: If you pray you will get the job, you may be twice as likely to give a good interview with «god on your side».
Good point, but now to fully understand the topic approach it from the other side, if God does exist then what value does scripture hold.
Well, it goes back to the same question: Since both sides and their fans all generally pray to the same God for victory, is making an obvious point of thanking God for favoring your team because of your better performance just rubbing it in, thus const.ituting poor sportsmanship?
There is no evidence of a god this side of the Big Bang; every thing we see has a pretty good scientific explanation based on evidence.
Bin Laden, as well as anyone that worships fake gods is sitting on the other side of the divide.
The good news is that Jesus has survived the embarrassing things that we Christians have done in His name, as found in the dark side of the history of fundamentalism, the messiness of the religious Right, and even more recently, in folks who burn the Koran and hold signs that say «God Hates Fags,» all in the name of Christianity.
The concept of once saved always saved takes a bit to get your head around but Gods grace is greater than our sin and greater than our good works it just takes faith in Jesus Christ to recieve Gods grace.In saying that to continue to sin as a christian is like playing with fire you will be burnt.Paul talks of the sexual immorality in corinthian church of the son and father that were sleeping with the same wife they were excommunicated from the church the members were not allowed to even eat with them until they repented.There are consequences for our actions.The other side to this is that if you continue to sin as a christian you are not walking by faith but walking by the flesh and are really backsliding.In the backslidden state you also become powerless and open to attack by satan as long as we walk in the flesh he can influence us to get worse not better.If we are walking in Christ satan may still try to tempt us but we are empowered by the holy spirit and overcome him and our faith increases.Both are saved by grace but one is powerless because of sin versus saved but an overcomer having been set free from sin i think this is what Paul was trying to explain.It is better to be an overcomer than overcome by sin.brentnz
To me the most ironic of all are the ones who think God wanted a human blood sacrifice, and the only possible way to get on God's good side is to acknowledge that.
There is some sort of imaginary line that is drawn, and everybody on one side of the line is «good with God,» and everybody on the other side needs to «get right with God.»
If Christians, school boards and God must be eternally committed to preserving the temporal side of biblical cosmology, then to be consistent there should be a return to preserving the spatial side as well.
To those who thought they were on God's good side, Jesus said «no, you're not.»
Some people think of God as «the force» from Star Wars, with both a good side and a dark side.
The only argument that makes sense for Christians is to claim that God, working with believing players to give them the courage to be better ones on both sides of every game, ultimately makes the game a better one, and more entertaining.
It shows that the good and bad exist side by side, the hypocrites with the righteous, but God will separate the one from the other in the end.
The New Testament claims that this Jesus of history, whose father and mother were well known to his contemporaries (John 6:42) is at the same time the pre-existent Son of God, and side by side with the historical event of the crucifixion it sets the definitely non-historical event of the resurrection.
Many times those things are noble and good things to do, but sometimes they have negative side effects, or they don't work out, and then God gets the blame.
Its just plan stupid and a waste of time, if you believe in god or buddah or allah or anyother good thats great for you and if you do not believe in a god thats great too, Whats one big problem that i cant understand is why people are so narrow minded on both sides of the specturm and even within different religions.
All is well if God is on our side.
Good luck with that when you get to teh other side and realize you are nothing but Light, you are Love and your are One with God, ye are gods!
Of course, the flip side is that if you are not doing well financially, it must mean that you are disobeying God.
well no need to worry, he has god on his side, and whatever will be will be, it is god's plan for the pope, just like the pope john paul, he had a muslim extremist shoot him, who then converted to catholicism after the pope forgave him, the pope claimed the virgin mary intercedded and both the pope and the muslim terrorist ectremist both believe so because the shot was a kill shot and the terrorist never missed in prior killings
if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.
You say that we atheists have the facts and better arguments on our side, but that God will prove us wrong.
A tiny wealthy minority in a sea of ecological and social disaster, thanking God for our good fortune while waiting to be overrun by the poor on all sides?
It's not just life / human nature / NATURE??? There are a lot of beautiful things in this world, but there is the uglier side as well... and to blaim it all on God — good or bad... well you might as well be living in the old testament... I am surprised there aren't still animal sacrifices to the angry, wrathful god that so many believe in... Oh, another question to the thumpers who believe that «God can be cruel» (And I really don't think Stephen King would say any of his work supports that)... So is God actually «perfect&raquGod — good or bad... well you might as well be living in the old testament... I am surprised there aren't still animal sacrifices to the angry, wrathful god that so many believe in... Oh, another question to the thumpers who believe that «God can be cruel» (And I really don't think Stephen King would say any of his work supports that)... So is God actually «perfect&raqugod that so many believe in... Oh, another question to the thumpers who believe that «God can be cruel» (And I really don't think Stephen King would say any of his work supports that)... So is God actually «perfect&raquGod can be cruel» (And I really don't think Stephen King would say any of his work supports that)... So is God actually «perfect&raquGod actually «perfect»?
They stated «You can talk until you are blue in the face to these non-believers about one side of God's love, but without telling all about his multiple facets, what good are you?»
A god which would demote itself to mortal form and die, not take sides with good, bad, human or animal.
You can talk until you are blue in the face to these non-believers about one side of God's love, but without telling all about his multiple facets, what good are you?
This is the basic message of Mike Glenn's book, and if you need help understanding the God who loves you and is on your side, this would be a good book for you to read.
Without grace, nobody could be sure they were good enough, obedient enough, holy enough to be on «God's good side.»
You know very well that I'm refering to god and the supernatural attributions thereof in this discussion, and yet you choose to derail onto side tracks of no relevance.
«Well, it's wrong when you do it, but not when we do it, because God is on our side.
After all, if he's not going to heaven with them, they'll be on the side of their «good god» who is allowing him to be tortured with fire forever and ever.
«Da» Bestest god chose us and is on our side!»
Ogden, for example, tells us that «God is not neutral or indifferent to creaturely conflict but always sides with what makes for the good of his creatures as against all that makes for evil» (FF 94).
Guys, if you want to attract people for the kingdom of God, it may be better to emulate the good Samaritan who came along side the Jewish man who had been robbed and beaten, and helped him up... rather than those who took up stones to kill the prostitute.
Though it is not without effort on the human side, it is not due to a manipulation of feelings or to good works, but to the grace of God accepted in grateful fidelity.
I am not an agnostic because I don't think it's very honest when faced with the lack of evidence for God to say «Well both sides of the debate are at a stand still!
Nickles also states the other side of the dilemma of the problem of evil, «If God is good, he is not God.»
But that empirical, visible church, located where we happen to live and which we can see functioning well or ill, is only the hither side — the imperfect expression, if you will — of what the New Testament thinks of as the «Body of Christ» and describes as «without spot or blemish,» as «the household of faith,» and as «the family of God.»
A clearer conception of the self - disclosure of the accepting reality may help us hold together both sides of a seemingly paradoxical answer: The Christian good news is that God is with us and for us, which is the implicit basis of effective therapeutic empathy.
On a more serious side, I have do have a problem believing in a personal God who supposedly has my best interests in mind — especially when I see thousands of certainly devout Christians rendered homeless by tornados, or dozens randomly killed by so - called «acts of God.»
Cultivating self - awareness is placing ourselves in God's presence with the desire to accept knowledge about ourselves on both sides of the spectrum — where we've not been clear the depth of our depravity as well as the strength of our abilities.
With God On Our Side is probably the best thing television has ever done on the conservative Christian insurgency in the political arena.
However, Rice also notes that there was, and always has been, another side both to Calvin and the Reformed tradition — a side that was less confident in the intellect's ability to answer all questions — a side that could acknowledge ambiguity and be open to mystery at the heart of the faith — and that understood God to be immanent as well as transcendent, and one whose «dependability came not from being unchanging, but from being loving.»
End of the year I read Light on the Dark Side of God by M. M. Campbell and Good God by Lucas Miles.
Humans crave order and power over their environment and their fellow creatures and what better way than to threaten them with unprovable stories and then kill them when the don't acquiesce — because YOU are right an god is on YOUR side.
Seeking to walk free from sin as much as it depends on our relating with God for the strength to do so as well as we are able to on this side of heaven is wise.