Sentences with phrase «gods sake man»

For gods sake man, calm down.

For Gods sake man, you got turned over big time.Just accept your slap in the chops and move on.

Not exact matches

But one day the world will realize that Jesus is not only a lamb but also a mighty man of war for God's sake.

However, just as religious beliefs have caused some serious problems for the world, I can cite you instance after instance of the love of God (or for love's sake) having driven men and women to incredibly kind acts for the betterment of mankind.

For Pete's sake read the Bible and note how clearly God is not of substance known to man.

For some it may mean that «there is an orphaned state required for the sake of the kingdom of heaven, in which a man who like all others is the child of his parents must symbolize with his being and action the present but hidden creation which is not a mere prolongation of the old, but the new creation in relation to which the old has already passed away...» This is, therefore, the first word that must be spoken: of discontinuity between the kingdom of God and any earthly order, even one as significant as the family.

Lower beings exist for the sake of the higher — grass for cows, cows for hungry humans — however, men and women exist for no other reason than God's own delight.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church says that «Christians of the first centuries said God created the world for the sake of communion with his divine life, a communion brought about by the «convocation» [gathering together] of men in Christ, and this «convocation» is the Church».

Male and female exist for the sake of the Incarnation; they are created in their difference and complementarity with a view to bringing about the conception of God made man and in every aspect they ind their meaning and vocation here.

By this revelation then, the deepest truth about God and thesalvation of man shines out for our sake in Christ, who is both the mediator and the fullness of all revelation.

And yet it captures also that so graceful was his generous acceptance of injustice for our sake that a pagan soldier could not help but observe: Surely this man was the Son of God!

Now when God speaks to a man, it is never for his personal satisfaction, for the sake of his soul or his happiness.

It is a metaphorical statement, true in its own poetical fashion; it is a most valuable way of saying in symbolical language, that he who is supreme in the order of being was for our sakes willing to be united to and self - expressed in the life of the Brother - Man who is therefore our Lord and Saviour, Emmanuel, God - with - us.

On the principle that has driven him from the start, and that has apparently been supported at every turn by God's response — namely, that the righteous ought not suffer — Abraham might have pressed the case to its logical conclusion: to spare the city for the sake of one righteous man.

The Christian God does not want to be absent for absence» sake, for as the Scriptures attest, the desire and the delight of Yahweh is to be with the children of men, to walk with them.

For example, God promised Abraham that, if he could find a certain number of righteous men in Sodom, he was willing to defer the city's temporal destruction for the sake of the righteous (Gen. 18:16 - 33; cf. 1 Kgs.

26 And now, for the sake of these things which I have spoken unto you — that is, for the sake of retaining a remission of your sins from day to day, that ye may walk guiltless before God — I would that ye should impart of your substance to the poor, every man according to that which he hath, such as feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, visiting the sick and administering to their relief, both spiritually and temporally, according to their wants.

Abraham is obviously not remembered here for the sake of the man Abraham, nor simply because of the relationship between God and that man.

Mental and physical well - being are proper objects of petition, provided they are not sought simply for personal ease and comfort, rather than for the sake of God and for the better service of fellow men.

Similarly, only a transcendent devotion can surely dissolve the barriers of class and race by teaching men to know themselves equals and brothers in the sight of God and for his sake.

This is Deutero - Isaiah's «suffering servant of the Lord,» the righteous man who suffers for the sake of God.

The Torah is not an objective law independent of man's actual relationship to God: it bestows life only on those who receive it in association with its Giver, and for His sake.

It is extremely difficult to say whether prophetic man loved God for God's sake or for his own sake.

For a man must believe that God is God only for the sake of his blessedness.

Furthermore, for this man's sake God came to the world, let himself be born, suffers and dies; and this suffering God almost begs and entreats this man to accept the help which is offered him!

The Catechism does at several points touch on a more synthetic integration of all God's works, commenting that «creation is revealed as the first step towards» the final Covenant of Love (CCC 288) and that» God created the world the sake of communion with his divine life, a communion brought about by the convocation of men in Christ, and this convocation is the Church» (CCC 760).

Responsibility is «to and for God, to men and for men... for the sake of Jesus Christ.

Thankfully Jesus became God / Man, not God and Man for our sake and our salvation, wonderful.

The Catechism teaches clearly that man is «the only creature on earth that God has willed for its own sake» (n. 356, cf. also 358), and affirms the uniquely human spiritual soul in n. 363 ff.

I said that Christians do not love all living creatures for Christ's sake; but if they think he died for all human beings, and wanted all human beings to share God's life through him, then we must either want to advance his purpose or want to frustrate it; we must either love our fellow men for his sake or hate them to spite him.

God created the world for the sake of communion with his divine life, a communion brought about by the «convocation» of men in Christ, and this «convocation» is the Church.»

What we can conceive abstractly as the «good principle,» which struggles within us with the «evil principle,» we can also represent concretely as the man, pleasing to God, who suffers for sake of the promotion of the universal good.

But he might then prefer to say: science for the sake of God and man, for it is only in relation to God and man that these values are significant.

This was a god man for Pete's sake!

Either every such passage simply emphasizes the humanity under some aspect of limitation, or else it cites the humiliation of the earthly career to illustrate how much God or Christ (Paul apparently makes no distinction between them in this connection) was willing to sacrifice for man's sake.

The acts of the earthly Jesus, for all their remembered beauty, were recognized as but the casual and partial manifestations of a love which only one supreme act had been able fully to express: He who had shared the nature and the name of God had for man's sake denied himself in a sense in which only God could: he had emptied himself, becoming a common man, and as a man had suffered both life and death, even the death of the cross...

The utilitarianism of an individualistic period, which promised men that through faith they might gain the economic virtues and wealth, differs from the pragmatism of our social climate of opinion, in which religion is used as a means for gaining social order and prosperity; but they are both utilitarian and equally remote from the love of God for his own sake and of the individual or social neighbor in his relation to God.

God has limited his own power «for the sake of giving man «space» in which to be more than a «robot» or a «puppet» in a «stage play.»»

The council's constitution on revelation implies that the fullness of the divine self - disclosure occurs only in Christ: «The deepest truth about God and the salvation of man shines out for our sake in Christ, who is both the mediator and the fullness of all revelation (mediator simul et plenitudo totius revelationis).»

Perhaps the truth lies elsewhere, as Vatican II seems to indicate: «man is the only creature on earth that God has wanted for its own sake,» (GS 24) since we alone have spiritual souls and are called by God to the supernatural end which is the beatific vision.

I believe God's intention is that men and women co-labor together, arm in arm for the sake of the Kingdom.

Still, in light of God's willingness to have faith in his creature by intending these moral powers for man and limiting his own powers for the sake of giving man «space» in which to be more than a «robot» or a «puppet» in a «stage play,» and most especially in light of God's willingness to enter into the worst of man's human - historical condition via the incarnation for the sake of redeeming the «lifeworld» that man, by his powers, has corrupted through sin, the moral agent can ultimately affirm his or her moral nature in confidence that this «image of God» will not only not be lost but will continue to be affirmed and redeemed to the glory of God.

We have already read of purity of heart and mercy, of persecution for righteousness» sake, of men lighting the world for God's glory, of love for enemies.

For God's sake, quite literally; for man's sake, quite surely, let us give up the scheme — but let us see to it that we do not lose altogether the insight or intuition which was behind it and which was expressed, sometimes in ghastly and ridiculous fashion, in its several elements.

Customarily, philosophers will, for the sake of convenience, divide the metaphysical branch of philosophy into four major, interrelated subdivisions: ontology («theory of being»), cosmology («theory of the universe or nature»), anthropology («theory of man»), and theology («theory of God»).

To Jonas, Luther wrote: «The chief cook, our Lord Katie, asks you to accept this coin and to buy for us poultry or other birds, or whatever in the airy kingdom of our feathered friends is subject to the dominion of man (and may be eaten)-- but for God's sake no ravens... bring rabbit or similar meaty delicacies... My Katie has brewed seven Quartalia... into which she has mixed thirty - two Scheffel of malt... She hopes it will turn out to be good beer.

A self face to face with Christ is a self potentiated by the prodigious concession of God, potentiated by the prodigious emphasis which falls upon it for the fact that God also for the sake of this self let Himself to be born, became man, suffered, died.

For the same reason the love of God and the love of man is to be for its own sake and not for the sake of any reward.

Alex has vague notions of his inadequacies as a man and as a father to his sons, but God knows what the root causes of these failings are and seeks to form him in love - divine love, a Father's love which will do anything for the sake of the well - being of his children.

Directly opposed to this view is the pragmatic theory which regards theoretical activity as an affair of rationalizations, essentially irrelevant to practice; practice is valued both for its own sake and as more directly contributory than thought can be to the welfare of men and the glory of God.