Sentences with phrase «golden rule did»

«Having the operation once increases the odds that it will be performed again, and if she became pregnant and needed another Caesarean, Golden Rule did not want to pay for it.»

The golden rule does not mean we should ignore bad behavior.

The Golden Rule does it.

The Golden Rule doesn't seem to apply to the GOPers these days.

After all, just because Jesus didn't originate the Golden Rule doesn't make it a bad idea to follow it.

The Golden Rule does not say, «Don't do it unto others, if you don't want others to do unto you.»

«The Golden Rule doesn't tell us what is right from wrong but helps to keep our judgments and actions in harmony with a caring and positive value system.»

I do believe the golden rule does encompass the idea that we can meet our spouse's needs in the way they would like it to be met.

Not exact matches

As the golden rule of business says: don't run out of money.

«Do something every day that you don't want to do; this is the golden rule for acquiring the habit of doing your duty without pain.&raquDo something every day that you don't want to do; this is the golden rule for acquiring the habit of doing your duty without pain.&raqudo; this is the golden rule for acquiring the habit of doing your duty without pain.»

When attempting to increase your conversion rate the most important thing to do is to remember the Golden Rule of Paid Search.

One of the golden rules of investment is: «Do not put all your eggs in one basket.»

As a non theist, I do not pretend to know what happens after death, I do not pretend to think that God has laid out laws other than the Golden Rule.

As a non-native-Albertan academic (in particular one from back east), I have learned that there are two golden rules to follow when in Alberta — don't mention the National Energy Program, and don't mention the National Energy Program.

Do we find that Jesus said we are to simply follow the «golden rule», or do we instead see that Jesus told us to do many thingDo we find that Jesus said we are to simply follow the «golden rule», or do we instead see that Jesus told us to do many thingdo we instead see that Jesus told us to do many thingdo many things?

We are, many times, focused on imposing our own agenda on others and in so doing forget the Golden Rule.

While I agree that we Christians tend to conveniently overlook or selectively apply Jesus» teachings, I don't think the issue of applying the Golden rule is as straight froward as it is presented here.

I think Bin Laden pretty much got what he deserved by the Golden Rule... which is Do unto others which you would have done unto you... well I think him KILLING so many means he asked to be given the same treatment!

Other important principles are the Golden Rule, which forbids selfishness, and what Grisez - Finnis call the Pauline Principle, which forbids deliberately sacrificing any one of the basic goods to another — i.e., doing evil that good may result.

The Golden rule, regardless of what Dave says, is only found in positive form in the bible «Do unto», not don't do, but actively take parDo unto», not don't do, but actively take pardo, but actively take part.

By that definition, the Golden Rule can apply to any act of revenge, and therefore I don't think it was intended that way.

I do not see what the issue is with the golden rule.

I don't see any violation of the golden rule.

Everyone's ideas of justice are on a spectrum, but I'd sum of my own in the fewest words by saying to follow the concept of the Golden Rule, which most Christians love to preach but don't follow.

I think the Golden Rule has become, «do unto others as they seem to deserve».

OK Nii, So you are saying you already followed the «do unto others» golden rule but not the «love others as you would love yourself» rule until 2 years ago?

Gaius, the Christian fundamentalists do not own The Golden Rule.

Obviously you don't follow the Golden Rule.

Since Jesus NEVER said anything bad about gays and preached the CRITICAL Golden Rule, do you support gay marriage?

Do you choose the CRITICAL Golden Rule in treating gays or do you CHOOSE the negative verses about theDo you choose the CRITICAL Golden Rule in treating gays or do you CHOOSE the negative verses about thedo you CHOOSE the negative verses about them?

All great religious Traditions teach a negative version of the Golden Rule — «you shalt not do unto others that which you would not have they do unto you.»

Consider, people love to praise the virtue of the golden rule, reap what you say, karma, what goes around comes around and so on, but do unto to others as you would have done unto you, tends to devolve into do unto to others as is done to you.

Articulating principles of a Golden Rule for communication can help align our speaking well with our doing good, align our speaking justly with doing justice.»

«Do unto others, etc.», is known as The Golden Rule, but is not attributed to Jesus.

You are thoroughly confused about the difference between the Golden Rule and doing EVERYTHING someone else wants.

If you want the golden rule to provide a moral framework, then for you it does.

I guess you might make the exception for the Golden Rule, but Jesus did not originate that little nugget of wisdom.

Any truth to be gleaned from the bible will be done by studying the prevailing themes like love, charity, and the golden rule and applying them to our God given consciences and living well.

I do like the Golden Rule.

I did read somewhere that the golden rule originated from one of those rather than love your neighbor as yourself.

I've already pointed to the golden rule as a functional moral framework which does not require a true objective / absolute standard.

Is he still supporting discriminating against gays or does he prefer we use the Golden Rule?

That is the point you are bringing up in your take regarding the «Golden Rule», that others have to accept whatever it is you want to do.

Why do so many Christian HYPOCRITES CHOOSE negative verses when dealing with gays rather than CHOOSE the MUCH MORE IMPORTANT Golden Rule?

I don't claim to speak for hypocrites, of which there are many, but the «golden rule» means warning people of sin, as we would wish that others would warn us also, if we were living in sin.

Your fallacy is the assumption that «doing whatever you want to do» is a license to ignore the Golden Rule.

In his essay «The Golden Rule in the Light of New Insight,» Harvard psychoanalyst Erik Erikson comments: «systematic students of ethics often indicate a certain disdain for this all - too - primitive ancestor of more logical principles; and Bernard Shaw found the rule an easy target: don't do to another what you would like to be done by, he warned, because his tastes may differ from yours» (Insight and Responsibility [Norton, 1964], p. 2Rule in the Light of New Insight,» Harvard psychoanalyst Erik Erikson comments: «systematic students of ethics often indicate a certain disdain for this all - too - primitive ancestor of more logical principles; and Bernard Shaw found the rule an easy target: don't do to another what you would like to be done by, he warned, because his tastes may differ from yours» (Insight and Responsibility [Norton, 1964], p. 2rule an easy target: don't do to another what you would like to be done by, he warned, because his tastes may differ from yours» (Insight and Responsibility [Norton, 1964], p. 226).

Did the historical Jesus utter a version of the Golden Rule?

Nor is the problem that so many people rattle off the golden rule without trying to live by it, like the scribes and Pharisees whom Jesus criticized on the grounds that «they say, and do not»; probably glib rattlers - off of the revised rule could be expected to fail as frequently to practice what they preach.

Were the golden rule properly interpreted and applied, an acting script for conflicts like these would read simply: Let your children be themselves; don't force them, overtly or covertly, to be the way you wish they were.