In fact, the
unpublished opinion drew very
well reasoned majority and dissenting
opinions in a context dealing with how much does an employer have to actively prosecute a matter — during the litigation process or to judgment — in order to decide whether a dispute falls within Labor Code section 3856 (b) or section 3856 (c).
Summary Dismissal Affirmed In Legal Malpractice Case Where Plaintiff Failed To Show That «Pertinent Decision Makers» Of Government Agency «Would Have» Agreed To A «
Better Result» But For The Alleged Incorrect Legal Advice Given By Lawyer During Settlement Negotiations Manveen Saluja, M.D v Honigman Miller Schwartz And Cohn LLP, et al,
Unpublished Per Curiam
Opinion of the Michigan Court of Appeals, issued March 16, 2017 (Docket No. 330367)