Sentences with phrase «goodweave label the child»

That's how we know that it supports slavery and the inferiority of women and discrimination against the handicapped and never labels child molesting as a sin.

Give me ONE QUOTE from the Bible that labels child molesting as a «SIN» or even an «ABOMINATION».

@RxCello for u to say that labelling children as «Christians», «Jewish» or «Muslims» is a bunch of bunk... I wud like to add to label children as «Atheist» or even for that matter as «unreligious» is a bunch of junk...!!

First off, don't label your child as «shy,» as in, «He's shy.»

But don't label your child as shy and don't discuss it when they're around.

It may be tempting to label your child by saying something like, «She's my little musician,» or «He's my math star.»

There is a reluctance on the part of teachers to label a child «mentally retarded» or «emotionally disturbed.»

Most importantly, don't be quick to label your child «picky» — that can be a self - fulfilling prophecy (you treat her like as a kid who won't eat vegetables, she will stop eating them).

Also, resist the urge to label your child a bully.

Better to just call it a new bed or a big bed but not label your child as «big».

Whatever the inspiration or reason for labelling their child with such a strange name, hopefully they don't get tired of explaining themselves.

Still, that one indicator alone isn't enough to label any child as psychopathic, but the research is surprising and scary at the same time.

We can avoid some huge potholes by refraining from labeling our children, i.e. «she's the smart one» or «he's the aggressive one».

Labeling your child's dresser drawers is a whimsical and practical way to organize clothes.

Some parents, by labeling their children as shy, appear to encourage a self - fulfilling prophecy, Adults may cajole coyly shy children into social interaction, thus reinforcing shy behavior.

There are many options available for labeling your child's clothes, blankets, and supplies.

There's nothing wrong with being shy, but it's rarely helpful to label a child, whether it's a label that places pressure on him («gifted,» for instance) or one that explains his behavior («Oh, he's just shy.»).

It is difficult to bring to mind a more divisive policy, or one more deleterious to social cohesion and respect, than one which allows schools to label children at the start of their lives with certain beliefs and then divide them up on that basis.

On this week's Media Project, Alan, Rex and Cailin talk about Jeopardy host Alex Trebek moderating a debate, the dangers of media labeling children «crisis actors,» and a listener letter.

But it is absolutely apt when, as Obama points out, the divide in Northern Ireland is sustained down the generations by labelling children in «faith» schools.

However, I believe we need much more firm evidence for the benefits of doing this before labelling children with such a diagnosis.

Labelling a child this way is nothing short of child abuse, let alone subjecting them to brain - damaging drugs on the basis of this diagnosis.

«I think we have to be careful in schools not to too quickly label children as low achieving, because kids develop early ideas of their own abilities,» Professor Gore said.

Forcing a child to publicly opt out of required patriotic activities risks labeling the child as unpatriotic.

The words we use to describe and label children do matter.

If the American public understood that their children's teachers will be judged by the same test scores that label their children as worthy or unworthy, it would be hard to sell the corporate idea of reform.

To be sure that we are providing a means to find a solution and not simply labeling a child with a disability, there are in - depth evaluations that must be carried out by professionals prior to designating a child as eligible for special education services.

Thanks in part to a board of education dominated by conservative reformers such as Andy Smarick of the American Enterprise Institute and former Thomas B. Fordham Institute President Chester Finn Jr. (the latter of whom presided over the think tank's initial activism against the Obama - era guidance), the Old Line State only plans to intervene when suspension levels for poor, minority, and special ed - labeled children are three times higher than that of other peers.

Assessment is absolutely a core part of teaching, but the Phonics Check tells teachers nothing they don't already know, while labelling children who don't pass as failures and subjecting them to the humiliation of the re-sit.

They are consumed with labeling children and schools with D or F, but unwilling to walk through the doors and see that for the most part these schools are doing remarkable work.

High - stakes tests are being used around the country to label children and schools as failing, to prevent kids from graduating, to fire teachers, and to close schools.

This is an important point as I have often noticed that parents who approach New York City independent schools by openly labeling their child as gifted, highly, exceptionally or profoundly gifted do not regularly receive a warm reception.

Never label a child a bully.

Not only are these destructive tests designed to label children and schools as failures, but the SBAC testing scam is the underpinning of Governor Malloy's teacher evaluation program.

Labeling children on the basis of unfair, inappropriate and discriminatory standardized tests is bad public policy.

Faced with the growing opposition to the Common Core testing scam that unfairly labels children as failures and is to be used to inappropriately assess teachers as part of Malloy's teacher evaluation system, many parents are rightfully refusing to allow their children to participate in the Common Core testing farce.

First, labeling a child seems to positively affect self - concept.

The code of practice has, she says, «really tried to put the brakes on labelling, but without the labels the children may not get the support they need».

And they want the public to believe that they didn't know their outrageous and medieval discipline policies included suspension rates that regular people would label child abuse?

Over and over and over again public school advocates have been writing that the Common Core SBAC test was fundamentally flawed and would unfairly label children as failures!

If you bank with Webster Bank, Bank of America or any of the other corporations that are pushing Governor Dannel Malloy's corporate education reform industry agenda, the next time you go to the bank, speak with your insurance company or communicate with one of CCER's funders, ask them why they are using the money that they take from us to undermine our public schools and label our children as failures.

What is clear is that the Reuters» articles serve as an astonishing and shocking expose about how privatization and greed have turned the SAT into an utter farce, especially in states like Connecticut that decided to use the «NEW» SAT as a «tool» to label children, evaluate teachers and rank public schools.

(F) providing incentives for whole - school approaches,... positive behavioral interventions and supports,... to reduce the need to label children as disabled in order to address the learning and behavioral needs of such children.

Many teachers also object to such separation, as education schools decry «tracking» as an outdated, unfair way to label children.

The controversies involve all the pros and cons of labeling children as well as a variety of political issues.

The article here was entitled, «A system that labels children as failures (another MUST READ by Wendy Lecker.»

It is not accurate and labels children who might just develop at a slightly later age.

If your child has suffered a choking injury as the result of negligent supervision or improperly labeled children's items, then you have the right to fight for compensation.

Parents in China label their children as «little emperors» and «little princesses,» who were born between the year 1979 and 2015 under one - child policy.

We know it is not appropriate to label children in our programs as «special ed» we don't say, «Oh Sally, she's special ed.»