Not exact matches
As an industry scientist, I'm less susceptible to the whims of
grant reviewers, but I still
work at a company that's largely
grant funded.
He got the
grant — along with a note from the academic
reviewers that said, «Davis must be told he will be killed if he tries to do this
work.»
If you have an opportunity to respond to a letter that is unjustifiably critical, try (if you can) to succinctly point out, in the gentlest possible way, that the writer is not the best person to judge
work in your field, and guide the committee toward more informed opinions (external evaluators and
reviewers of papers or
grant proposals).
Experienced
grant writers often encourage less experienced colleagues to do the
reviewers»
work for them.
To convince administrators and
grant reviewers of the worthiness of their
work, scientists have to be cheerleaders for their research; they may not be as
Finally, even though non-U.S. applicants qualify (even foreign institutions can win NIH research
grants),
reviewers are asked to consider whether similar
work is being done in the United States.
Finally: Even though non-U.S. applicants qualify (even foreign institutions can win NIH research
grants),
reviewers are asked to consider whether similar
work is being done in the U.S..
Madsen's
work brings her into direct contact with both
grant applicants and
reviewers, and she offers ideas such as:
The revised biosketch is now being phased in across NIH, despite howls of protest that it burdens
grant reviewers and lets scientists inflate the importance of their
work.
[4] CIHR continues to
work on issues regarding the size and membership of the expert panels, the use of teleconferencing in early stage review, and the algorithms used to match applications to
reviewers, issues which will need to be resolved prior to the next competition for both «Foundation» and «Project»
grants, scheduled for fall 2016.
NIMH will also
work to improve communication and outreach by providing webinars and conference presentations for applicants about clinical trials, and will
work to ensure a consistent understanding of this approach by
grant reviewers.
I am able to network with professionals from diverse disciplines, to interact with colleagues in other institutions across the nation, to match my interests and
work skills to a good career, to be a peer -
reviewer (and to be peer - reviewed), to learn about career and
grant opportunities, to
work in a team setting, to familiarize myself with the variety of available careers, and to have a very well - rounded experience outside of the lab.
Granted, this
reviewer's a long - time fan of Crowe's
work, but don't let that dissuade you - Jerry Maguire is one of the best character dramas of its decade, and what it's got to say makes even more sense in the current climate.
Sarah has
worked in education for ten years as a special education teacher and in a variety of teacher leader roles including: Special Education and Disproportionality
Grant Coordinator, WASC coordinator, member of the California State Network of Educators reviewing formative assessment and professional development material for the Smarter Balanced Consortium's Digital Library, and Race to the Top Peer
Reviewer for the 2013 District
Grant Competition.
This is the company, elsevier, with spectacular profit rates, whch gets its material (papers, books) which have mostly been produced at public expense (university salaries, public research
grants), do very little actual editorial
work (one usually has to supply papers charts etc «print ready»), get academic
reviewers to review the books and papers free of charge (well, paid for by universities or they do it in free time), depend on journal editors whose time is paid for by (generally publicly funded) universities, then sells the journals to the same universities, sometimes for subscription prices in the thousands of dollars.
We're already in Washington quite a bit dealing with
grant reviewers, and doing a lot of «dirty
work».