Sentences with phrase «hvcre under the final rule»

Under this final rule, beginning on June 9, 2017, advisers will be subject to the prohibited transaction rules and will generally be required to (1) make recommendations that are in their client's best interest (i.e., IRA recommendations that are prudent and loyal), (2) avoid misleading statements, and (3) charge no more than reasonable compensation for their services.

Under this final rule, the Department expects that over time investors will come to realize much of the gains due to the Impartial Conduct Standards.

Also, the compliance requirements for BICE have been «greatly simplified» under the final rule, Reish adds.

Under final rules set to be issued today, NYC restaurant owners will not be required to check paperwork to make sure dogs newly allowed under the so - called «dining with dogs» law to join their owners at outdoor cafes are licensed and vaccinated.

Under the final rules, institutional panels will have the authority to approve animal experiments for entire programs and projects rather than the experiment - by - experiment basis envisioned in the initial proposal.

Comparison of previous and current regulatory requirements under the final rule «Nutrition Standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs.»

Under the final rule, the person actually flying a drone must be at least 16 years old and have a remote pilot certificate with a small UAS rating, or be directly supervised by someone with such a certificate.

Under this final rule, the requirements of 49 CFR 393.60 are revised to allow for the utilization of specific vehicle safety technologies that would be mounted on the interior of the windshield of a CMV, and within the area swept by the windshield wipers.

To demonstrate rate - based compliance under the final rule, states will need to show that there are a sufficient number of low - emitting resources diluting EGU emissions.

Under the final rule, we specify that covered entities may disclose to a person involved in the current health care of the individual (such as a family member, other relative, close personal friend, or any other person identified by the individual) protected health information directly related to the person's involvement in the current health care of an individual or payment related to the individual's health care.

Under the final rule, covered entities may obtain authorization to disclose protected health information to private entities seeking to establish registries or other databases; they may disclose protected health information as required by law; or they may disclose protected health information to such entities if they meet the conditions of one of the provisions of § § 164.510 or 164.512.

Under the final rule's section on personal representatives (§ 164.502 (g)-RRB-, a person with authority to make decisions about the health care of an individual, under applicable law, may make decisions about the protected health information of that individual, to the extent that the protected health information is relevant to such person's representation.

Under the final rule, a covered entity that maintains a web site describing the services and benefits it offers must make its privacy notice prominently available through the site.

Response: Under the final rule, covered entities must comply with the minimum necessary provisions unless the disclosure is required by law.

Under the final rule, if the individual refuses to grant consent for this disclosure, the health care provider may refuse to treat the individual.

Under the final rule, a covered entity may deny access to an individual if a licensed health care professional determines that the access requested is reasonably likely to endanger the life or physical safety of the individual or another person.

Response: Under the final rule, the decision whether to tie an agreement to restrict to the way the individual pays for services is left to each covered entity.

Response: Under the final rule, a restriction that is agreed to between an individual and a covered entity is only binding on the covered entity that agreed to the restriction and not on downstream entities.

We reviewed the important purposes for which some commenters said government agencies needed protected health information, and we believe that most of those needs can be met through the other categories of permitted uses and disclosures without authorization allowed under the final rule, including provisions permitting covered entities to disclose information (subject to certain limitations) to government agencies for public health, health oversight, law enforcement, and otherwise as required by law.

Response: Under the final rule, if the disclosure is pursuant to an order of a court or administrative tribunal, covered entities may disclose only the protected health information expressly authorized by the order.

Response: Under the final rule, covered entities may disclose protected health information pursuant to an administrative order so the flow of protected health information from covered entities to SSA and the states should not be disrupted.

In order to make uses and disclosures that are not covered by the consent requirements and not otherwise permitted or required under the final rule, covered entities must obtain the individual's «authorization.»

Examples of other circumstances in which authorizations are required under the final rule include disclosure of protected health information to an employer for an employment physical, pre-enrollment underwriting for insurance, or the sharing of protected health insurance information by an insurer with an employer.

We revise the duration of this right under the final rule.

Under the final rule, protected health information about diplomatic personnel is not accorded special treatment.

Under the final rule, covered entities may disclose protected health information in compliance with and as limited by relevant requirements of: a court order or court - ordered warrant, or a subpoena or summons issued by a judicial officer.

This function may be performed by the privacy official, but because it is a distinct right under the final rule and may be performed by someone else, we are costing it separately.

Under the final rule, covered entities may disclose protected health information to such individuals when the covered entity or public health authority is authorized by law to notify these individuals as necessary in the conduct of a public health intervention or investigation.

Under the final rule, covered entities may disclose protected health information in response to a court or administrative order, provided that only the protected health information expressly authorized by the order is disclosed.

Under the final rule, a covered health care provider with direct treatment relationships must obtain an individual's consent for use or disclosure of protected health information for treatment, payment, or health care operations.

Under the final rule, when the opportunity to object to uses and disclosures for a facility's directory can not practicably be provided due to an individual's incapacity or an emergency treatment circumstance, covered health care providers may use or disclose some or all of the protected health information that the rule allows to be included in the directory, if the disclosure is: (1) consistent with the individual's prior expressed preference, if known to the covered health care provider; and (2) in the individual's best interest, as determined by the covered health care provider in the exercise of professional judgement.

Under the final rule, «plan administration» does not include any employment - related functions or functions in connection with any other benefits or benefit plans, and group health plans may not disclose information for such purposes absent an authorization from the individual.

Under the final rule, only providers that have direct treatment relationships with individuals are required to provide notices to them.

Under the NPRM and under the final rule, to obtain protected health information, law enforcement officials must comply with whatever other law is applicable.

Under the final rule providers will have to have policies and procedures to determine the minimum amount of protected health information to disclose for standard disclosure requests as well, but may need to review and revise existing procedures to make sure they are consistent with the final rule.

Under the final rule, we refer to the process by which a covered entity seeks agreement from an individual regarding how it will use and disclose the individual's protected health information for treatment, payment, and health care operations as «consent.»

Under the final rule, they will have to obtain consent for treatment and health care operations, as well, but this may entail only minor changes in the language of the consent to incorporate these other categories and to conform to the rule.

Under the final rule, we also establish provisions for disclosure of directory information to clergy that are slightly different from those which apply for disclosure to the general public.

A covered entity that is the health care component of a larger entity is permitted under the final rule to include the legal department of the larger entity as part of the health care component.

Accordingly, under the final rule, in joint law enforcement / oversight investigations involving suspected health care fraud, the health oversight disclosures apply, even if the individual also is the subject of the investigation.

Under the final rule, a person is a personal representative of a living individual if, under applicable law, such person has authority to act on behalf of an individual in making decisions related to health care.

Such an agreement between a covered health care provider or health plan and an individual would not be enforceable under the final rule, but might be enforceable under applicable state law.

Disclosures for research purposes under the final rule, as in the proposed regulation, are permissive disclosures only.

Under the final rule, we consider private accrediting groups to be performing a health care operations function for covered entities.

Under the final rule, we clarify the NPRM provision to state that covered entities may disclose protected health information to family members, relatives, or close personal friends of an individual or any other person identified by the individual, to the extent that the information directly relates to the person's involvement in the individual's current health care.

However, under the final rule, IRBs and privacy board members could include patient advocates provided they met the required membership criteria in § 164.512 (i).

The costs associated with this final rule involve, for each provision, consideration of both the degree to which covered entities must modify their existing records management systems and privacy policies under the final rule, and the extent to which there is a change in behavior by both patients and the covered entities as a result of the final rule.

There are approximately 12,200 health plans (including self - insured employer and government health plans that are at least partially self - administered)[45], 6480 hospitals, and 630,000 non-hospital providers that will bear implementation costs under the final rule.

We understand the need for additional guidance on whether specific entities or persons are health care providers under the final rule.

Under the final rule, no special protection against disclosure is provided for peer review information of the type the commenter describes.