Thomas Nelson is a large publisher, but they don't put their name on the books nearly as prominently as many
Harlequin lines do.
HH = Harlequin Historicals (one of the traditional category
Harlequin lines — this is a new medallion logo they have added to front cover in recent months) Hh = Harlequin Horizons (the vanity / subsidy press recently launched) How they can legitimately think there won't be brand dilution is beyond me, when the biggest difference between these two brands is whether or not a letter is capitalized?
So, here's the question I heard from a million (well, four) different people over the last handful of weeks: «Why are we punishing all
the Harlequin lines for what is a breach by one part of Harlequin Enterprises?»
For that reason, so long as rejection letters for the standard
Harlequin lines include an advertisement for DellArte, I don't see how RWA can continue to devote them organizational resources by linking Harlequin from the website or comping editors at conference.
There's an easy answer to that question: None of
the Harlequin lines have applied for eligibility as a publisher.
I know that you don't like to represent category romance, but in your opinion, if a writer has just completed a manuscript targeted at a specific
harlequin line, should they mention it in the query letter (in light of what's happening)?
• Breeders who can not produce a 5 or even 7 generation pedigree when asked • Breeders who do not show their dogs in any discipline • Breeders who say «we had a really nice dog» or «we wanted our kids to experience the micracle of birth» so we bred • Breeders who sell or breed unpapered dogs — PUREBRED dogs are required to be registered • Breeders who do not do any health testing such as on eyes, heart, thyroid, hips etc. before breeding • Breeders who do not want you to visit with them or their dogs • Breeders who do not have a contract • Breeders who have zero health guarantees on puppies / dogs sold from their Kennels • Breeders who do not require all pet / companion pups to be altered • Breeders who say that some colours are «rare» and promote the puppies as such • Breeders who breed a dog before the age of 2 (hips can not even be certified until the age of 2) • Breeders who breed their bitch every heat cycle • Breeders who indiscrimanately breed outside of the GDCA Colour Code — Yes, years ago, it was acceptable to bring in a Blue or Fawn to improve head / bone / substance in
a Harlequin line etc. yet this type of breeding was to be done ONLY be highly reputable / quality knowledgeable / experienced Breeders.
Not exact matches
By referring people whose submissions are rejected to a vanity - publishing enterprise with vague encouragements that maybe they'll be picked up by
Harlequin's trade
lines if they do really well, they're already taking part in unfair business practices.
You'd think if
Harlequin was going to go into that
line of business that they would do something to set themselves above the rest.
I haven't done much research into this, but I'm going to declare that this is a first:
Harlequin, the book publishing house known for its romance novels, is launching a
line of wines called Vintages by
Harlequin today.
My guess is that you might find that some
lines will begin compliance before others; this allows
Harlequin to come up with a piecemeal solution to the public outrage.
Asking
Harlequin to break up it's
lines is like asking Proctor and Gamble to individually sell all of its products.
I like your ideas a lot, but I do wonder whether
Harlequin will be able to adhere to the «we won't refer rejected authors to X
lines to DellArte» part of the equation, as I have a strong suspicion that including that language in their standard rejection letters is part of their contractual agreement with Author Solutions.
My only point is, RWA could do things that cross the
line into per se illegality, and so what I am trying to say is more along the
lines of «be careful and talk to counsel who understands antitrust implications, and make sure you're not trying to punish
Harlequin, but protect authors; otherwise the road is perilous and could lead you unto treble damages; and lo, they are big.»
HARLEQUIN: For
line editing, that's $ 0.035 per word.
Harlequin will extend its iconic series brand with
Harlequin - E, a digital first series program that allows writers the chance to turn out - of - the - box ideas that don't fit into existing series romance
lines into ebooks.
But Maya comes from a long
line of people who call themselves
Harlequins — a fierce group of warriors willing to sacrifice their lives to protect a select few known as Travelers.
They set up an ebook
line with editors, experienced
harlequin staff and don't link it to the brand.
I know
Harlequin is about the bottom
line but this is ridiculous.
If you find yourself unable to resist reading the
Harlequin Presents
line, and you want to be around people who can identify with your addiction, and
As a freelance editor, he helped
Harlequin's digital - first imprint Carina Press build its science fiction and fantasy
line, and he has worked on titles for the Nelson Literary Agency Digital Liaison Platform and bestselling indie authors.
The few readers gutsy enough to approach the table of seven were looking for Christian books or Inspirational romances, not Desires, Temptations, and the other hot
lines Harlequin / Silhouette had stocked.
Harlequin already took unagented submissions for a bunch of its
lines.
Avon is a division of the Big Five publisher HarperCollins (which also owns
Harlequin and Harper Impulse) that publishes traditional romance
lines in print and ebook.
One little point, that I see already getting confused —
Harlequin Enterprises now has TWO
lines with a painfully similar identification logo.
I think this is a pathetic way for
Harlequin to prostitute whatever name recognition that they have to feed their bottom
line at the expense of aspiring authors dreams.
If you want to write for the
Harlequin Love Inspired romance or suspense
line your manuscript should be around 55,000 - 60,000 words.
But there are so many more ethical questions it reminds me of when
Harlequin Mills & Boon started their self publishing arm and were directing authors who got rejections from their traditional publhsing
lines, to the self publishing arm.
There are many reasons to sign with one of
Harlequin's series
lines, built - in readership one of the best.
The ones with the horizontal
lines that I showed you — which I call Reclining
Harlequin, which is one of my favorite titles, it's so stupid — both those paintings are quite large paintings and this plane is not as locked in as it is here [the painting in the studio], although I really love this painting.
We discussed the viburnum, the pear tree, the
harlequin maple, and the three magnificent Austrian pines at the back property
line that my neighbor wants to cut down — and I'm rather embarrassed to admit that I learned many of their names for the first time during this conversation.
I suppose Customs Canada will now have to include much of
Harlequin's «hotter»
lines on the banned in Canada list.