Sentences with phrase «having less money going»

Not exact matches

«When you go through life, what you'll find is what you take out of the world over time — be it money, cars, stuff, accolades — is much less important than what you've put into the world.»

When asked by a local news station about his tab, Boren said he only took home $ 400,000 — less than he'd normally charge — and the rest of the money went to mental health experts, crime - scene reconstructors, mitigation investigators (who rarely get hired outside of death penalty cases), and DNA labs.

Verizon went along, even though it could have done the work for less, but did not know that CCS had hired consultants who worked for Lanham as part of a scheme to skim money off the project.

They needed less money, since they were only offering one kind of shirt, but they also figured they might raise that amount quickly, and have a shot at going far beyond — a correct guess, as things turned out.

While it may seem like raising outside money would actually make it easier to build such a company, even that achievement is often out of reach for women: Less than 3 percent of venture capital goes to female CEOs.

If both sides, through their eyes and their people's eyes, have concluded that the plaintiff is absolutely going to win this case, and the plaintiff is going to get a lot of money because they're totally on board with everything that has been presented, then that might be a good reason for the defendant to agree to a settlement with the plaintiff for less money than the potential exposure if the jury comes back and finds willful infringement.

Still, in the interim this leaves an outfit like Unblock Us to quietly go about raking in some unknown sum of money while giving Canadian consumers less and less of a reason to subscribe to a broadcaster's VoD content or what - have - you because they already saw it all via Netflix U.S.

Because people are living longer, «we have a middle - age retirement system where less money is going to the truly elderly,» Steuerle said.

Overall, this budget adds new details about how Ottawa will spend some of the $ 93 billion in new money the Liberals had already set out for infrastructure — $ 11.2 billion will go to affordable housing over the next 11 years, less than the $ 12.6 billion over eight years the Federation of Canadian Municipalities says was needed.

They'd rather have complex regulations that allow them to go right to the edge, than less expensive rules which would cost them money.

You'll have the satisfaction of knowing that more of your money is growing and less is going to pay fees.

I have less than 5 % of my money in this; my wife wouldn't let me go in with any more (too risky she says).

In fact, this is the financially savvy way to go because, again, the faster you pay off your debt, the less money you have to devote to interest.

Here's why: I know that if people get more business from LinkedIn because of what I'm showing them, it's going to help them make more money in less time, and that in turn will give them more time to do what they love and have a better life — travel more, get more family time... whatever that might be.

So if we started to get inflation that's going to create a real problem for the central banks because they won't be able to emit in the quantities of currency they've been emitting because that will fuel inflation and inflation of course destroys capital, it destroys the savings, it destroys the purchasing power of wages and people actually have less money to spend, less purchasing power.

So long as you know how your money is being allocated and have a plan for what to do in different scenarios, you will go through life with much less financial stress.

You know I'd care less about people complaining about taxpayer money going to the poor if income was actually determined by work.

If my rich boss paid me $ 15,000 a year less and kept that money himself, it would go to his savings and not out into the economy.

Gone are the days of receiving block grants, and North American churches generally have less money to give.

I had spent so much money buying books about fishing, attending fishing conferences, going to Africa to fish, and founding the World Fishing Training Center that although it was true that I had never caught any fish, this did not make me any less of an expert in fishing.

Jesus told his rich friend to give all his money to the poor, and that a rich man has less chance of getting to heaven that a camel going through the eye of a needle.

No you will just have gave money that should have went to helping your family to a church that could care less that you exist.

I bought some of these with one goal in mind to use with my tea infuser as I have had chocolate tea that was tea and nibs before but soo expensive this way I can use any tea and as much cacao for less money winner all around Goes Well With: Tea and straight in your mouth but wouldn't last long that way also good in porridge

I'm going to have to study the recipes a little though, so that switching around dishes would cost me less money.

And the best thing about the deal is that I'm not going to make any less money if I don't do it, if I have to get off halfway across.

Also why would Theo leave Arsenal and go to another club where he makes significantly less money?

he is a ddecent striker but then why haven't have the likes of spuds / chelski or liverlool gone for him we need a top striker + he is also injury prone missed many games for nufc last season there is areason why marilelle sold him for less money

If he doesn't sign for less money than Özil and Sanchez, I'd sell and go all out for Reus.

Ozil could really care less, he has all the medals anyone could ever need and its just about the money for him now, I think theres a strong beleif in the squad that they are just never going to win anything of noteand they play with that attitude showing.

It makes me wonder though, if the NHL had taken less money and gone over to ESPN after the lockout instead of Versus (now NBC Sports Network), would the league be making more money and would more teams be out of the red?

I think only barca real or Bayern can tempt those players away from leicester, they would give at least a year to the club, but season after that they will move onto other club depending on their form next season.As for arsenal transfer i wouldn't want to listen to rumours as most of the times these rumours are just utter garbage.i want a certain rumour about Wolfsburg signing giroud to be true.Anyways if our idiotic manager has some sense left in him after an embarrassing season he should get a premium striker which the club needed for past 4 years.He need to put his ego aside and his old philosophy of waiting for players to develop.We need already established players in every department of our team.Penny pinching has cost us just pay the damn money get the players.I get the feeling next season is going to be harder and we have less chance of winning cause man city have had 2 seasons without premier league and guardiola is gonna bring more quality and hunger to that team.

2 things; wenger has to take massive crtisism for favoritism with certain players and for spending latley on less than whats needed e.g why play ozil, ramsey, walcott, when they havnt performed, anyone can see a front 3 of welbeck, sanchez and perez would cause havoc Xhaka wtf he cant takle, is not mobile enough and has the temper and the decision making skills of a of a suicide victim, why did nt we go in for Kante less money and 10x a better player or even Schneiderlin thinking about what happens after wenger ask yourself this will we win the league next year with wenger then ask if we got the right manager next year would we win the league

Yes we owe the banks around 230 million it's a long term loan we pay back around 25 million a year, this season 2014/15 we ar going to turn ower around 330 + million And our outgoing is going to be around 220 million or less, this season and the next 5 seasons we will be malikng around 110 million profit a year, we had 170million in the bank in April which was confirmed by the club we have spent some money on players 70 + million leaves you with 100 million in the bank then in June we recived 3 new sponsership deal worth around 130 million (wether or not it was paid lump sump or spread across the season to lower profit margin that I haven't looked at) all in all we can spend ready cash ower 200 milion if we realy want we can spend double and more of that sum and we still be within the FFP rules becouse they look at accounts 3 years acumalation

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

I mean Christ Danny Welbeck was let go for just slightly less than lucas Perez and Wenger wasn't even in the country when he was bought in, what does that tell you about the club and its ambitions????? if you added up the money spent on oriental and Japanese players who we NEVER see play in an arsenal shirt over the last ten years, we could have brought in half the Barcelona side including Messi so you tell me what THATS all about??? its a disgrace, and Giroud acting like a football god because he scored and equalizer really just epitomises the whole messed up attitude and THAT starts with Wenger and his «its not my fault it was the ref» attitude its stinks

The paper suggests that it is the money that would come from the sale of our strikers that would make the difference but Jackson is going to cost less than # 25 million and we have that and more in the bank.

UNLESS there's a stud that dropped (Barkley, Fitzpatrick or Chubb) if all 3 of those are gone, trading back w / the Bills (12th) or Cardinals (15th) would be best we could literally get the same player we were targetting at 10 that could be there at 12 or 15 less money slotted for that spot + much needed additional picks = WIN!!

Sagna and Clichy have got the money they wanted now they will be going to lesser other teams.

Also the amt of money they pay is less the further they go back even though they don't have to worry about it.

My research found that teams receiving less than half the money have gone 11 - 5 ATS (68.8 %) and teams receiving less than one - third of the money have gone 3 - 0 ATS.

I was on team «trade Wiggins rather than Zach» from the beginning even if he would miss half season... that kid is going to be awesome while also commanding less money than Wiggins.

RVP left because he could get more money elsewhere and Wenger let him go because he had less than a year left on his contract and 25 million now is better than 0 nine months later.

Teams receiving less than 50 % of spread tickets and more than 50 % of the money have gone just 5 - 13 ATS this season.

Most Arsenal fans would go for the German, as Alexis with his attitude right is a much more important player on the pitch, but there is less demand for him and probably less money to come.

If he's anywhere near the money quoted — I haven't been able to confirm this, and I suspect it's substantially less — it's going to be a big number.

He is still young and more or less not going to have a problem playing every week at his present club, The new owner who is a Russian with plenty of money to spend on players has no need to sell and will spend the same sort of money we will and at moment the way Ithey are playing and the way we are they would have no trouble turning us over, We need to go back to grass roots which is what the majority want produce local talent and actually give them a chance in the first team, Play entertaining football all the time not respect the point (they will come if you play well) There is talent all over the world we need to find it, Howe is showing the way and in years to come may be a great England Manager but not for us right now and if I was him I would stay put

@ larryking listen jock wenger could never coach anyother club because no big club would go six season without a trophy there is no way wenger could go to madrid and go two season without a trophy no way in hell he would be fired in no time bmunich fired klinsman less than half season look at the real madrid coach grave yard pelligrinie made 95 + points last season that amount would win the league in almost any country yet he got fired i can go on if fergi goes two seasons without a trophy am sure he gone i love arsenal but football is about winning trophies wenger has hypnotize you i do nt care arsenal have gone five years without a trophy and six witout the league not even a carling cup or fa cup and loosing all our best players all for money all this talk about wenger and his youth policies i can count on both hands all the players that came through arsenal youth system that went on to be world beaters look at the current crop walcott nasri diaby denilson bedtner clichy none of these are world class they have improve minimal @ arsenal compare that to barca their youths pedro and co are world beaters event the great vanpercy who we rate he would never leave arsenal because all that chance wenger gives him he would» t get at other big clubs this does not make sense we buy young players they take ages to develop most do nt» t then we sell them or they leave because they want to win things that how you grow pretty soon that top four will become very hard to stay in if we get out of that then what i wish all you wenger fans luck am all out of patients with him last chance this year................

Sugar coat it anyway you like, hell, do and say whatever it is that makes it less frustrating and painful for you, but were going to have to get real at some stage and have the fundamentals right if we are to continue to be expected to pay so much money for our tickets.

Lets face it, most women will Never go with a man that makes much Less money than they do which makes it very sad for many of us men that really wanted to get married to have a family since many women just Can't Accept us for who we really are.

I wish I had gone for a smaller stand and spent less money on promotional materials.»