The original organizational structure of finding tools like the Canadian Abridgment was fist built in print, and I would argue that its electronic equivalent has enough foundation from the print that its origins can not be dismissed and while it is likely that «
Headnotes come from databases of case summaries,» there is still a significant value to pointing a researcher to a copy of a decision that has a headnote.
Not exact matches
It would be good if you described who these people were in your
headnote and how they
came up with their dishes.
In reading what now passes for a
headnote in most of the cases reported by Carswell, I
came across the phrase, «efforts and exhortions».