Not exact matches
Fitbit will also move to Google's (googl) cloud data storage platform, much of which is already certified as complying with the federal
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act, or HIPAA, which
regulates the use of medical records.
This law is also commonly known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act (PPACA) or simply Affordable Care
Act (ACA) which
regulates health insurance companies; in which some would tend to rip off clients for profit.
But the Affordable Care
Act, in contrast,
regulates how Americans pay for
health care, an economic activity and industry that is undeniably national in scope.
We also protected the public's
health by passing a local law
regulating e-cigarettes, thereby expanding on the work of our predecessors who passed the County's Clean Air
Act two decades ago.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration
regulates all dietary supplements as food products under the 1994 Dietary Supplement
Health and Education
Act, which says that the manufacturers are only responsible for making sure a supplement is safe and meets efficacy claims.
As we approach the 40th anniversary of the Clean Air
Act and Clean Water
Act, ensuring public
health and sustaining a federal agency to
regulate global warming emissions is crucial to the future of our nation and preservation of our planet.
The CEQ also helped shape the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) declaration that it did not have the authority to
regulate greenhouse gas emissions as well as its decision not to declare them a danger to public
health under the Clean Air
Act, despite an internal EPA analysis noting that greenhouse gas emissions endangered public welfare.
Tomorrow's vote on a measure introduced by Senator Lisa Murkowski (R — AK) would throw out a determination by EPA in December that greenhouse gases «endanger»
health and «welfare» and therefore should be
regulated under the Clean Air
Act.
But the White House argued that rising carbon dioxide levels worsen the allergens and pollutants that sensitize people to asthma, and that cutting greenhouse gases also cuts particulate pollution, making a compelling case for EPA to
regulate greenhouse gases under its
health mandate in the Clean Air
Act.
You are correct that stem cells are
regulated by the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) as human cells, tissues and cellular and tissue - based products (HCT / Ps) under the authority of Section 361 of the Public
Health Service (PHS)
Act, and the implementing regulations in Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 1271 (see http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/TissueTissueProducts/RegulationofTissues/ucm150485.htm and http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/TissueTissueProducts/QuestionsaboutTissues/ucm136323.htm for more information).
The Dietary Supplement
Health and Education
Act of 1994 (DSHEA) is the law that set the standard for supplement regulations and made it so that they're
regulated as foods instead of drugs.
Under the Federal Safe Drinking Water
Act, public water systems that provide you with tap water, have to submit annual quality reports that reveal sources and levels of
regulated contaminants, and their potential
health effects.
[1,2,3,4] Bovine cartilage stimulates the immune system in certain conditions, but suppresses it in others... Thus it
acts as a «normaliser» or immunoregulator to balance and
regulate a
health promoting response for a given stiumulus.
These resistant starches, rather than
acting as a nutrient, behave similarly to dietary fiber and can help
regulate blood sugar, improve appetite control and promote bowel
health.
Yes, N.D.'s are
regulated in Ontario under the 1991 Regulated Health Professions Act and are licensed by the College of Naturopaths of Ontari
regulated in Ontario under the 1991
Regulated Health Professions Act and are licensed by the College of Naturopaths of Ontari
Regulated Health Professions
Act and are licensed by the College of Naturopaths of Ontario (CONO).
Amla enhances food absorption, balances stomach acid, fortifies the liver, nourishes the brain and mental functioning, supports the heart, strengthens the lungs,
regulates elimination of free radicals, enhances fertility, helps the urinary system, increases skin
health, promotes healthier hair,
acts as a body coolant, flushes out toxins, increases vitality, strengthens eyes, improves muscle tone and,
acts as an antioxidant.
Magnesium is a vital mineral necessary for overall
health because it
regulates the nervous system and
acts as a balancing mineral.
Social and emotional learning featured prominently in the
act, which defined safe and supportive schools as those that ``... foster a safe, positive, healthy and inclusive whole - school learning environment that (i) enable students to develop positive relationships with adults and peers,
regulate their emotions and behavior, achieve academic and non-academic success in school and maintain physical and psychological
health and well - being and (ii) integrate services and align initiatives that promote students» behavioral
health, including social and emotional learning, bullying prevention, trauma sensitivity, dropout prevention, truancy reduction, children's mental
health, foster care and homeless youth education, inclusion of students with disabilities, positive behavioral approaches that reduce suspensions and expulsions and other similar initiatives.»
42 USC 7609, PL 91 - 604, Clean Air
Act of 1970 This act set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), to protect public health and welfare, and New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), that strictly regulated emissions of a new source entering an ar
Act of 1970 This
act set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), to protect public health and welfare, and New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), that strictly regulated emissions of a new source entering an ar
act set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), to protect public
health and welfare, and New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), that strictly
regulated emissions of a new source entering an area.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal Plant
Health Inspection Service (APHIS) plans to outsource to private parties the inspections required for operations
regulated by the Animal Welfare
Act, including puppy mills, animal exhibitions, and animal research labs.
Under the Animal Welfare
Act (AWA), wholesale animal breeders — those who sell to pet stores, for instance — are
regulated, licensed and subject to inspections by the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service at USDA.
In December 2007 the Bush administration found that greenhouse gases, especially those emitted by motor vehicles, were a danger to public
health, and therefore should be
regulated by the Clean Air
Act.
EPA can only
regulate one category of smokestacks at a time, and its regulations must meet the relevant Clean Air
Act criteria, e.g. «the best system of emission reduction which (taking into account the cost of achieving such reduction and any non-air quality
health and environmental impact and energy requirements) the Administrator determines has been adequately demonstrated.»
The agency's finding — which the White House will now review — comes in response to an April 2007 Supreme Court decision that greenhouse - gas emissions could be
regulated under the Clean Air
Act if the EPA determines they pose a threat to public
health and welfare.
They argued that it was required to use its powers under the Clean Air
Act, a law from the 1960s aimed first at smog and later acid rain, to declare carbon dioxide a threat to the environment and public
health and
regulate it accordingly.
In 2007, the Supreme Court ruled that the Clean Air
Act required the EPA to
regulate heat - trapping greenhouse gases if they posed a threat to public
health (which, most climate scientists agree, they do).
«The funding limitation will allow Congress to carefully and thoroughly debate a permanent clarification to the Clean Air
Act to ensure it remains a strong tool for protecting public
health by
regulating and mitigating air pollutants, and that it is not transformed into a vehicle to impose a national energy tax,» explains Chairman Whitfield's press release.
In 2007, in Massachusetts v. EPA, the US Supreme Court ruled that CO2 qualifies as an air pollutant under the Clean Air
Act, and that the EPA must
regulate it if it determines it to be a danger to public
health.
Completed in 2009, the finding holds that greenhouse gases are a threat to public
health, compelling the EPA to
regulate them under the Clean Air
Act.
-- Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this section, the Administrator, taking into consideration the public
health and environmental impacts of black carbon emissions, including the effects on global and regional warming, the Arctic, and other snow and ice - covered surfaces, shall propose regulations under the existing authorities of this
Act to reduce emissions of black carbon or propose a finding that existing regulations promulgated pursuant to this
Act adequately
regulate black carbon emissions.
Jackson was also asked about the EPA's finding last week that carbon dioxide emissions are a danger to public
health, which triggers the process of
regulating the pollutant under the Clean Air
Act.
But ancillary benefits are still benefits, and the White House has a good reason to hype them given that the legal rationale for the new regulations is rooted in the Clean Air
Act, which gave the EPA the authority to
regulate pollutants that «endanger public
health and welfare.»
With a proposed rule on light - duty vehicles waiting in the wings, the agency issued today — opening day for the climate talks in Copenhagen — its «endangerment finding» concluding that GHGs pose a threat to both public
health and welfare, tests required under the Clean Air
Act in order to
regulate emissions from point sources, such as power plants, manufacturing plants, and vehicles.
While the Court did not overturn EPA's analysis and conclusion that public
health benefits of the MATS rule vastly outweigh the costs to the coal and oil industry, it did find that EPA should have first considered whether it was appropriate to
regulate power plants under the Clean Air
Act's hazardous air pollution safeguards.
«Carbon dioxide in the air we breathe has no adverse
health effects, in contrast to carbon monoxide and high concentrations of the genuine pollutants listed in the Clean Air
Act, the source of the EPA's authority to
regulate air pollutants.»
• A rider that would prevent the EPA from issuing any regulations on greenhouse - gas emissions over the next year — despite the fact that the Supreme Court has ruled the agency has the responsibility to
regulate those emissions as a public -
health threat under the Clean Air
Act.
To recap: Congress passed the Clean Air
Act decades ago, which requires the EPA to determine whether certain gases are a «harmful pollutant», a threat to public
health, and to
regulate them if they are.
Follow me on Twitter More on GOP's Anti-Clean Air
Act Bill 5 Leading US
Health Groups Oppose Efforts to Block EPA
Regulating CO2 Fred Upton Met with Energy Lobbyists in Secret Before His About Face on Climate
The free - market think tank, which has a history of intellectually hi - larious denialism, says the «Environment (sic) Protection Agency» silenced an internal dissenter in the course of its endangerment finding, a process that concluded in April that greenhouse - gases threaten public
health and can be
regulated under the Clean Air
Act.
In his written testimony, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., President of the Waterkeeper Alliance, stressed the importance of the Clean Air
Act and and its positive impact on public
health, and the need to defend its ability to
regulate GHGs.
Under the Clean Air
Act, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is required to
regulate emission of pollutants that «endanger public
health and welfare.»
There are also new
regulated health professions, like traditional Chinese Medicine and Acupuncture, Psychotherapy, Kinesiology, Naturopaths, and Homeopaths, as well as two new controlled
acts, psycotherapy and acupuncture.
Richard Steinecke of Steinecke Maciura LeBlanc, Barristers & Solicitors, spoke about recent amendments to the
Regulated Health Professions
Act in Ontario.
If giving a putative «
health profession» a self -
regulating body and a governing
act isn't promotion, it's too close for my taste.
They developed a romantic and sexual relationship, and engaged in consensual sexual contact six days after the pharmacist filled a prescription for Ms. W. Under the Ontario
Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c. 18, and its Schedule 2, the Health Professions Procedural Code (the «Code»), a health professional who commits sexual misconduct by sexual abusing a patient (in certain specific ways) is subject to mandatory revocation and can not apply for reinstatement for five years (Co
Health Professions
Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c. 18, and its Schedule 2, the
Health Professions Procedural Code (the «Code»), a health professional who commits sexual misconduct by sexual abusing a patient (in certain specific ways) is subject to mandatory revocation and can not apply for reinstatement for five years (Co
Health Professions Procedural Code (the «Code»), a
health professional who commits sexual misconduct by sexual abusing a patient (in certain specific ways) is subject to mandatory revocation and can not apply for reinstatement for five years (Co
health professional who commits sexual misconduct by sexual abusing a patient (in certain specific ways) is subject to mandatory revocation and can not apply for reinstatement for five years (Code ss.
Unlike criminal law, which prohibits certain activities, laws such as the Highway Traffic
Act, the Occupational
Health and Safety
Act, and the Food Safety and Quality
Act,
regulate activities that are otherwise lawful and often quite useful to society.
Join Lindsay Kantor on May 14th in Toronto at the OBA's Professional Development Program on Advanced Issues in Professional Regulation, where she will speak on the topic of Exploring New Interim Suspension Powers under the
Regulated Health Professions
Act alongside Shenda Tanchak, Registrar and CEO, of the College of Physiotherapists.
The initial chapters focus on the law and basic principles / procedural requirements of bringing a claim and are a good summary — to include consideration of recent developments such as the impact of Woodland v Swimming Teachers Association [2014] AC 537 on the issue of non-delegable duties and how this applies to the NHS and the introduction of the statutory duty of candour (
Health and Social Care
Act 2008 (
Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, reg 20).
This paper grounds its argument in the new requirement born from Reference re Assisted Human Reproduction
Act, which
regulates Parliament's power to enact criminal law with respect to
health matters.
Proposed Changes to the
Regulated Health Professions
Act Furthering Patient Protection and Accountability