(don't think I'm in any way talking
health and wealth gospel!!)
Even though I don't care for Osteen his message seem to be nothing more than a cafeteria selection of positive thinking, Pentecostalism, and the good ole American
Health and Wealth Gospel.
The health and wealth Gospel is a travesty of the real Gospel, precisely because it not only denies the value of suffering and the call of Christ to take up one's cross and follow him, it also tries to manipulate God to give us «the desires of our hearts», whether they are good for us or not.
For example, within the Christian community I am really disturbed by
the health and wealth gospel that is preached today.
To be fair, there are some parts of the article that point out some problems in the Faith — such as the prevalence of
the health and wealth gospel (which is clearly at odds with scripture).
Not exact matches
Today's successful Evangelicalism, putatively the stronghold of orthodoxies, often finds its congregants lured by «
health and wealth» or «signs
and wonders»
gospels which, in Butler's terms, manipulate the supernatural in hardly conventional forms.
To be fair, Reconstructionist authors do not posit a guaranteed cause -
and - effect relationship between obedience
and prosperity, but it is easy to see in their writings an easy slide into the
health -
and -
wealth gospel.
The theology of the Cross has been replaced by the
health -
and -
wealth Prosperity
Gospel.
While scorned by mainstream Christians, the
health -
and -
wealth gospel brand continues to spread, boasting over one million American adherents
and many more millions abroad.
Would it be convenient for Christians if the «
health and wealth» prosperity
Gospel was true?
The
Health and Wealth / Prosperity
Gospel is preached instead of the Cross of Christ.
While 17 percent of American Christians openly identify with the movement, the «
health and wealth»
gospel gets dismissed
and critiqued by most mainstream evangelical leaders.
I suppose my aversion to «God things» is a response to what I see as a general acceptance of the
wealth,
health,
and prosperity
gospel even among those who say they reject it.
It is not just those enamored with the prosperity
gospel who have pursued
health,
wealth,
and happiness as if they were divine rights
and signs of God's blessing.
Would Jesus then teach a «
health and wealth»
gospel?