For example, one study found that characteristics elicited from
chatting, such as educational status and occupation, predicted «yes» decisions at small events (15 - 25
people), whereas «yes» decisions at larger events were predicted by height and weight.5 People at larger events are also more likely to form a consensus about which participants are most appealing, 6 supporting the idea that we dumb - down our decisions as choices inc
people), whereas «yes» decisions at larger events were predicted by
height and weight.5
People at larger events are also more likely to form a consensus about which participants are most appealing, 6 supporting the idea that we dumb - down our decisions as choices inc
People at larger events are also more likely
to form a consensus about which participants are most appealing, 6 supporting the idea that we dumb - down our decisions as choices increase.