Here at HUMAN we are more than a Vending company.
Not exact matches
That
's similar to
human health care, but
at least
here in Canada, people aren't exposed to those costs thanks to a good state insurance system.
Here's research into how music can affect collaboration
at work (short answer: it
's great for it), family interactions
at home, and even the workings of the
human body, as well as findings that suggest you should tailor your playlist to the type of work you
're hoping to accomplish while listening.
Denmark's flexicurity
is also another one of those pragmatically
human ideas that makes one wonder whether we
're coming
at things all wrong
here in North America.
What I find somewhat disturbing about the proliferation of even (relatively) normal kids videos
is the impossibility of determining the degree of automation which
is at work
here; how to parse out the gap between
human and machine.
There
is human nature
at work
here.
Here we find the pope's great worry:
At precisely the moment for the world's great evangelization and the great manifestation of love, the devices by which the world has
been prepared — economic and technological —
are excluding the charity and denying the truth that «judge and direct»
human development.
Of the trillions of stars (most of which probably have some rocky planets orbiting it from the leftovers of its formation) there
are probably plenty of planets orbiting their stars
at the same distance as ours with varying conditions, ours just happened to
be right for
humans to evolve and
be here today.
Here's the penultimate paragraph: Unfortunately,
humans seem to forget this fact when we find ourselves turning to nature to guide us through difficult choices, such as arguments about whether life begins
at....
I don't know what you think you
're proving
here, but
human beings are very good
at compartmentalizing, which allows them to embrace contradictory attitudes and behaviors.
From Zeus to Ra to Allah to any other deity that has come out of
human history, the one thing that sets Yahweh apart to me
is that
here is a God who actually reached out in time
at a point in
human history to establish relationship with
humans.
The homosexual person may initially recoil
at the perspective presented
here, but that
is because he easily confuses
human nature with what «feels natural» or what «comes naturally» - in his case, the powerful desire to engage in sexual activity with another male.
For a guide I would suggest Benedict XVI, who understood deeply that the quest for the truth of God which takes a living form in monasticism must lie
at the foundation of any social order that
is finally
human and any political order that
is truly free (See
here and
here).
Part One,
here called «
Human Experience and Process Thought,»
was given on the Alexander Brown Foundation as a series of lectures
at Randolph - Macon College, Ashland, Virginia, U.S.A. in 1976; the material in Part Two,
here called «God in Process: Christian Faith and Process Thought,»
was a series of lectures given
at St. Augustine's College, Canterbury, England in 1966.
Of one thing
at least we can
be confident: The other
human species
are no more, and there
are probably no galactic visitors
here, either.
But now I think that there
is a mighty
human solidarity
at stake
here as well.
Perhaps the major difference between Wood and the other proposals we have examined (except for the Mud Flower Collective's proposal)
is located
here,
at the point of explicitly or implicitly assumed anthropology or view of what a
human being is.
THe message hasn't changed — but the way people look
at it the further out we go from the original intent — it opens it up to different takes on it — and with no one
here to explain what the original intent
is — we have to rely on illogical
humans to interpret it.
That place
is our
human condition that
is spelled out in Watergate; mangled bodies and land in Indochina; dry, dusty, suffering starvation in Africa; inconceivable poverty, oppression and torture in South America; humiliation and wretchedness in the slums
here «
at home»: and all this supported by economic structures and a system which we have supported and which destroys
human beings and rapes the good earth.
At this point Buddhism presents an instructive contrast to Christianity, for
here [in Buddhism] one discovers unbelievably complex systems of meditation centering upon the image of death, but
here death
is a way to a dissolution of the
human condition, and therefore to the abolition of pain and suffering.21
Apparently, reading ancient hieroglyphs and cave paintings in the
here and now tell us more about the truth of the alienated
human being than any day to day feeling of ennui while ordering a latte
at Starbucks.
It
is here that
human emotion, repressed
at some points by the austerity of the doctrine of God as developed in theology, has its full outlet — a warm
human emotion which the peasant can share with the mystic.
She
is the Mystical Body of Christ;
at the same time a visible society instituted with hierarchical organs, and a spiritual community; the Church on earth, the pilgrim People of God
here below, and the Church filled with heavenly blessings; the germ and the first fruits of the Kingdom of God, through which the work and the sufferings of Redemption
are continued throughout
human history, and which looks for its perfect accomplishment beyond time in glory.
Although this
is not the place to discuss
at greater length the nature of evil,
human sin, suffering, death and the relationship between them, they must find mention
here for they constitute the chief problems which continually confront man and make him question whether there
is any justice or meaning to
be found in life.
Being has traditionally
been preferred to becoming, identity
at the expense of diversity, etc. (CSPM 44).11 The Leibnizian view of
human identity I
am here criticizing clearly exhibits this bias.
Here human nature
was at home in the world for one last glorious moment, and then it
was all over — the point of culmination
was the eve of disintegration.
What we have
here is a «ladder of
being» not uncommon in ancient times: there
is God
at the top, with
human beings below God but above all other animals, and there
are also
beings above
humans.
The well - known phrase «impossible possibility» stands
here in Niebuhr's thought for the warning that the pure love of God transcends
human possibility.17
At the same time an element of uncalculating sacrificial giving of the self to the good of the other
is possible for man.
Of course, it
is possible to reply that the alleged stumbling block occurs every day according to Christian teaching, because what
here in the case of the first
human being is felt to
be contrary to the fundamental conceptions of metaphysics and the methodological basis of natural science, happens continually
at the origin of every individual
human soul,
at the genesis of every single
human being, for such souls equally with those of the first
human beings,
are created by God directly out of nothing.
Considering his use elsewhere of the phrase, «thinking animal,» one can only suppose that
here, too, it refers to man, or a
human being, in contrast to other kinds of animals who feel but can not think, or,
at any rate, can not think that they think (1970a, 94; 1971, 208).
As we sit
here, 750,000 souls
are in
human warehouses across America where they don't have enough doctors to shake a stick
at, where 60 per cent
are just sitting, rocking out their lives.
And another great theme of divine justice intersects
here as well, for the good of procreation points forward to «the woman's seed» who will crush the head of the serpent, representing a future of
human life that
is permanently
at enmity with death.
And
here more than
at any other point we
are incited to a response — a response which
is not ours individually but ours as a fellowship of
human brethren, a response which
is manifested in our returning commitment to God in Christ, our thankful effort by His Grace to conform to His Will, and our selfless surrender to Him in worship.
It seems unobscure that the species of
human freedom endorsed
here precludes,
at the very least, an immediate movement from ontology to ethics, from the «
is» to the «ought,» without the intermediate operation of our functionally ultimate valuation — thus affirming, in part, Sartre's claim: «Ontology itself can not formulate ethical precepts.»
Here's a better idea for this so - called «governor» to consider: Take a look
at the research done by your alma mater, Texas A&M, on global warming and the effect it will have on Texas (higher temps and greater stress on water through decreased rainfall and increased evaporation)... then stop poopooing the efforts to mitigate the effect
humans are having on climate change.
see what you have to understand about living in a real world — a world where god
is just a story and not real — its a world based on scientific and physical laws that
are proven to exist and their effects
are measurable... us as
humans, mere animals, hold no real power or control aside thru ingenuity which allows us to change our environment to suit us... stay with me
here...
at this point in
human history we ceased to change to suit our environment and started changing it to suit us — thats destruction of the earth to suit one species — that should go over well...
We can see
here an emphasis on the dignity and value of the
human person that
was at the heart of Pope John Paul's philosophical studies and
is echoed both in the teachings of the Second Vatican Council — to which he made noted contributions as a bishop — and in subsequent teachings of the Magisterium.
He has pointed out that a theology which
is strictly confined to the world of «
here and now can not take account of the ultimate questions which men must ask, whereas every sound Christian theology
is required indeed to speak of that «
here and now», but to relate it to God as a creative principle and to see God
at work in the immediacies of
human existence in the whole range of what we style «secular existence».
For those who look around them
at almost every form of institutional life, actions little short of the
human barbarism which happened in Nazi Germany
are happening
here.
Weather you believe or not (I open my eyes every day) so it
's not hard to All will stand before the lord on the day of reckoning which man will no doubtedly usher in and those who don't believe or against god will try to wage war on the almighty to no avail, only to
be left in ruins... the great Satan (adversary) will
be all who oppose god in battle, that serpent of old
is still
here today, we live in the middle of a brood of vipers and this website
is part of the venom aimed
at distorting the faithfuls belief as well as a an agonist for those who wish to continue to disbelieve... CNN
is anti god To my brothers and sisters who truly live in Christ Peace
be with you and never forget your path despite the darkness that
is trying to consume you, bring enough oil for your lamps to live in this darkness and bring extra in case of a delay, he will not abandon you... we will not
be forgotten Amen To those who don't, I know the myth of Santa and the easterbunny really choked up your insides to find that they
were not real, but childhood
is over and it
was a cruel
human joke designed to make it that much harder for you to believe in that which visits you and you can't see, no matter you have life so
is it too much to ask for a little belief?
So if there
are no atheist posts, wouldn't that
be right» Yes, atheists don't believe your god exists; but, many of us do believe your religion
is one of greatest disasters to ever befall
human kind and so we
are here to make sure your lies and illogic don't go unchallenged unlike the last 2000 years Your just miffed that christians cant burn heretics
at the stake any more
A discussion of the proper use of the philosophical category of ontology would take us too far afield
here, but for now let us consider
humans at the three basic levels of
being.
[The earlier passage
is here inserted:] «The essential principle
is this: That
human psycho - physical activity must exceed a certain intensity for any waking consciousness
at all to occur, and that during the waking state any particular specification of the said activity (whether spontaneous or due to stimulation), which
is capable of occasioning a particular specification of consciousness, must exceed in its turn a certain further degree of intensity for the consciousness actually to arise...
im sure many do but i just wish EVERYBODY
here could know the true Jesus... I wish I could know Him better... it hurts a little
at first... to know how short of His love we have fallen... but what
is so awesome about him
is that his atonement
was so total that it can even atone for the hateful comments that have
been posted
here... and whats even MORE amazing
is that His atonement can atone for MY sins... if we could just see one glimpse of his heart we would all lay down all of this
human «intelligence» and say... I
'm so sorry... please show me the right way.
Look
at all the scared, hate - filled Christian wan na
be's... Jesus
was a liberal and loves all... it
's only the simple - minded
humans who live in fear, hate and ignorance... you Christian sinners wouldn't know what to do with yourselves if you didn't have something, or someone, to hate... you
are pathetic... it
was your family before you who wanted to see blacks remain slaves an invoked their perverted views of the bible to justify their hate... and now you, their offspring,
are here to repeat their stupid mistakes... ignorant losers
are those who hate and mock someone different... Live and let live...
Here, as Rabkin summarizes the physicist Niels Bohr, twentieth - century physicists «forced to live with apparently irresolvable paradoxes and contrarieties
are, distressing though it may seem
at first, in the mainstream of
human experience.»
The first
is that, as an instinctive Platonist, I naturally believe that every genuine act of
human creativity
is simultaneously an innovation and a discovery, a marriage of poetic craft and contemplative vision that captures traces of eternity's radiance in fugitive splendors
here below by translating our tacit knowledge of the eternal forms into finite objects of reflection,
at once strange and strangely familiar.
Here we
are back
at the level of
human decisions.
He analyzes the development of
human consciousness, from its immediate perception of the
here and now, to the stage of self - consciousness, the understanding that allows man to analyze the world and order his own actions accordingly.3 Following this
is the stage of reason itself, understanding of the real, after which spirit, by means of religions and art, attains the absolute knowledge, the level
at which man recognizes in the world the stages of his own reason.
What
is at stake
here, however,
is not the pedagogy but the view of
human personhood that
is implied by schooling.