3)
Hidden defects whether known or unknown would certainly open the contract back up to ensure both buyer and seller are covered financially and from a liability standpoint.
Not exact matches
If all testing is normal in a dog with partial seizures, many neurologists consider these to be «Cyptogenic» (meaning
hidden) seizures that actually have an underlying structural abnormality (i.e. SES), that is undetectable using current methods.5 It is controversial
whether partial seizures might be caused by a genetic
defect.
Where the SPIS really changes things is in the middle ground: latent
defects where the question is
whether the
defect was
hidden by the seller.
This piece of worthless garbage (the SPIS) is nothing more than a smoke - screen vehicle to be adopted by sellers (
whether honest or dishonest in nature, not to mention their ignorance of the state of their own properties) in pursuit of facilitating smooth sales whereby sales would be more difficult to achieve without the supposed «feel good» SPIS boxes being initialed «yes» or «no», as the case may be, reflecting the negative reality, or positive unreality, as the case may be, of the condition /
hidden defects of the said listed properties.
It says, «
Whether or not the seller completes an SPIS, the law requires a seller to disclose
hidden material
defects to a property.»