Sentences with phrase «high court decision refusing»

Litigators are hopeful that a Court of Appeal (CoA) decision to overturn a High Court decision refusing relief from sanctions will stem the unco - operative and tactical stance taken by some parties post-Mitchell.

Tube Lines Ltd v RMT [2010]: High Court decision refusing the employer's attempt to injunct RMT industrial action after a ballot.

Not exact matches

A Christian couple will head to the UK's highest court next April to defend their decision to refuse... More

The British Association for Shooting and Conservation (BASC) has welcomed the decision of the High Court to quash a decision by Natural England to refuse to issue a licence to control buzzards causing severe damage by killing young pheasants on a shoot.

The DfE has said that it disagrees with «some aspects» of the court's decision, and that the government is seeking leave to appeal directly to the Court of Appeal over the ruling after the High Court refused it permission to apcourt's decision, and that the government is seeking leave to appeal directly to the Court of Appeal over the ruling after the High Court refused it permission to apCourt of Appeal over the ruling after the High Court refused it permission to apCourt refused it permission to appeal.

Under Chief Justice Burger, the High Court refused to reverse several controversial decisions it had handed down under his activist predecessor, Earl Warren.

The Singapore High Court refused to set aside the adjudicator's decision.

«High - court majority reaffirms Freshwater's dismissal»: The Columbus Dispatch has an article that begins, «The Ohio Supreme Court will not revisit its 4 - 3 decision that found a Mount Vernon teacher was legally dismissed for insubordination when he refused to remove religious symbols from his classroom.&rcourt majority reaffirms Freshwater's dismissal»: The Columbus Dispatch has an article that begins, «The Ohio Supreme Court will not revisit its 4 - 3 decision that found a Mount Vernon teacher was legally dismissed for insubordination when he refused to remove religious symbols from his classroom.&rCourt will not revisit its 4 - 3 decision that found a Mount Vernon teacher was legally dismissed for insubordination when he refused to remove religious symbols from his classroom.»

For example, though not explicitly stated in this decision, the high thresholds that must be met in order to refuse the recognition of an arbitral award in Ontario may represent the Court reinforcing their commitment to international comity in light of globalization trends.

«Alito edged closer to suggesting that he might be willing to reconsider Roe if he is confirmed to the high court, refusing, under persistent questioning by Democrats, to say that he regards the 1973 decision as «settled law» that «can't be re-examined.»

(7) The Court of Appeal should not refuse to overturn a decision on the basis of precedent, or stare decisis, because leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada is not automatic and Canada's highest court can not therefore be relied upon to resolve any inconsistencies that result from differing rulings by the Court of Appeal on a particular iCourt of Appeal should not refuse to overturn a decision on the basis of precedent, or stare decisis, because leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada is not automatic and Canada's highest court can not therefore be relied upon to resolve any inconsistencies that result from differing rulings by the Court of Appeal on a particular iCourt of Canada is not automatic and Canada's highest court can not therefore be relied upon to resolve any inconsistencies that result from differing rulings by the Court of Appeal on a particular icourt can not therefore be relied upon to resolve any inconsistencies that result from differing rulings by the Court of Appeal on a particular iCourt of Appeal on a particular issue.

The decision of the High Court in R (Binomugisha) v Southwark LBC makes it difficult for a local social services authority to refuse to accommodate a failed asylum seeker who makes what purports to be a fresh asylum or human rights claim to remain in the UK if: (i) the individual is one of the more vulnerable individuals who, as asylum seekers, were accommodated by local authorities; and (ii) the purported fresh claim is not manifestly unfounded.

The Quebec Court of Appeal based its decision on last February's Supreme Court of Canada ruling (previously noted on Slaw) in another case, where the highest court refused to find that the mandatory nature ERC curriculum infringes on the parents» and the students» freedom of reliCourt of Appeal based its decision on last February's Supreme Court of Canada ruling (previously noted on Slaw) in another case, where the highest court refused to find that the mandatory nature ERC curriculum infringes on the parents» and the students» freedom of reliCourt of Canada ruling (previously noted on Slaw) in another case, where the highest court refused to find that the mandatory nature ERC curriculum infringes on the parents» and the students» freedom of relicourt refused to find that the mandatory nature ERC curriculum infringes on the parents» and the students» freedom of religion.

The Casebook also includes court decisions from Canada: Haig v. Canada (1992)(omission of sexual orientation in the Canadian Human Rights Act is discriminatory); Egan v. Canada (1995)(whether exclusion of same - sex relationships from the definition of common law spouse violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Section 15 prohibition of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation); Vriend v. Alberta (1998)(college laboratory instructor dismissed because of his homosexuality); Hall v. Powers (2002)(student refused permission to attend a prom at a Catholic high school with his boyfriend); Halpern et al. v. Attorney General of Canada (2003)(whether denial of marriage licenses to same - sex couples based on the common law definition of marriage was discriminatory under the Charter; a postscript indicates that the 2005 Civil Marriage Act provided for gender - neutral definition of marriage).

The nation's highest court refused a request by Mercury Insurance and lobbyists representing State Farm and other insurance companies to review a 2013 decision rejecting Mercury's request for an 8 % increase in its homeowners insurance rates and ordering the company instead to lower its rates by 8 %.

This safer environment is created in the collaborative process by the promise that neither attorney will ever take the other spouse to court, by the extensive use of empathic listening skills, by refusing to get hooked into being responsible for the high - conflict individual's problems, by waiting to get into problem - solving and decision making until the high - conflict individual has become less reactive, and providing a lot of structure for the problem - solving and decision - making process itself.

However, in the interim, the Commission welcomes the Government's decision to clarify the good faith negotiation requirements in the Native Title Act following the High Court's decision [32] to refuse special leave to appeal the decision of the Full Federal Court in FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd v Cox (FMG).