Sentences with phrase «holloway argues»

Dr Jo Taylor, also of the Department of Psychology at Royal Holloway argues «People frequently argue that phonics disadvantages reading comprehension.

If it is true, as Holloway argues, that the very foundations of matter and the identity of human nature are aligned upon the coming of the Word made flesh, then a society which is uncertain about the existence of God and whether Man has any meaning or purpose must be subject to crisis, alienation and chaos even more inevitably than CiV is able to show.

Holloway argues that before the Fall the sexual urge in humans would have likewise looked with obedience «to its wise times and seasons».

As has been noted, Holloway argues that a proper appreciation of how sex should be used needs to bear in mind the fact that our present experience of it is coloured by concupiscence.

Even now, Holloway argues, growth in holiness and the «sedating» of sexual concupiscence can lead a couple to be able only to seek thesexual act when they are seeking it in its full meaning.

Such an outlook is not only unrealistic in the face of real marriage experience, it is also, Holloway argues, misguided theologically.

Holloway argues «The aspiration of human knowledge is to attain as closely as possible to the unity of the wisdom of God.»

Holloway argued that when the objects of are experience are «plumbed to [their] depths by empirical science the last bastion of Greek... philosophy was and is under siege» (Perspectives in Philosophy, Vol.

The deeper understanding of the physical realm offered by modern science has confirmed this insight and, as Holloway argued, deepened it.

Holloway argued that the final end of any spiritual being can only be in relationship with God.

Not exact matches

Holloway went on to argue that only one type of diagnosis of our post-Reformation, post-modern science, relativism is possible:

Though acknowledging significant divergences between the Thomist schools and Holloway's thought, the editorial argued that Holloway had remained faithful to both the intentions of the Magisterium, which looks to St. Thomas as the theologian and philosopher par excellence, and to the essence of St. Thomas» project because he had attempted to synthesise theology with the scientific culture of his day.

This article will summarise Fr Edward Holloway's arguments against contraception while also arguing that Natural Family Planning is a good but not «perfect» use of the marriage act.

Sex in the Plan of Creation Holloway, in keeping with the Scotist vision of the Incarnation promoted by this magazine, argues not simply that the coming of Christ was part of the plan of creation but that the division of the sexes was planned as the means by which the Incarnation would be possible: «God did not fashion sex «for loving» but that the Incarnation might be the gift of creation from the potential of its own resources for the enfleshing of God».

Holloway «sargumentation, however, is more technical: He argues that love is spiritual and is «made» «through the spiritual soul» «not through the body as [the] principle of eliciting», [3] and the body is not apt to be the cause of spiritual union per se.

Holloway is thus arguing that sexual union can be an example of this but it is not the only example of it.

Whilst Fr Edward Holloway, founder of Faith movement, argues that such is positive evidence for God, Stoeger caught the mood of the conference by simply saying it was not inconsistent with there existing - above and beyond science - a «theological teleology, a reason for it all», and thus it was not inconsistent with the existence of God.»

This article will summarise Fr Edward Holloway's arguments against contraception while also arguing that Natural Family Planning is a good...

The article states,» [Fr Holloway] argues that love is spiritual and is «made» «through the spiritual soul» «not through the body as [the] principle of eliciting.»»

The shift from a Christian frame to Machiavelli's comes when Holloway defines a wicked political leader as one «without principle,» and then proceeds to argue that Trump can not be such a leader, as he appears to have a strong, consistent interest in amassing power.

He could even go at it from the angle that given Holloway pulled out of his title fight the only real option for a title fight was him and Pettis, so in theory he could and probably should argue that McGregor cost him the title and all the fame and fortune that comes with it!

I would even argue that Max Holloway has done more impressive things than DJ.

I would argue we're in the golden era of like - able, humble champions right now, Stipe, DC, Robert Whittaker, Max Holloway, DJ, Rose Namajunas... even Ferguson and potentially Khabib, are all down to earth champions who make the UFC brand better.

Thus, the Commonwealth argued, neither statute was a vehicle for relief for Holloway since a charge that results in a No True Bill finding by the Grand Jury is not dismissed with prejudice and can be refiled by the Commonwealth.