Sentences with phrase «holloway does»

Holloway doesn't directly address the organization's awards program.

When you strike with the sort of output Holloway does you're bound to get caught as there are more opportunities for opponents to land shots.

Holloway's response was to threaten the FA with his resignation should any punishment be handed out, which means the rest of this preview could be a load of rubbish and partly irrelevant if Holloway does pack his bags and leave the Seasiders well and truly in the lurch, Steve Coppell style.

Manager Ian Holloway doesn't have the same amount of money that Malky Mackay has at Cardiff but that hasn't stopped him signing several players in cut - price deals.

But it does mean that there are times when no candidate is suitable; to discount this possibility, as Holloway does, is to neuter the prophetic — and sometimes costly — nature of Christian public witness.

Holloway does not speak of «dignity» since this was not the focus of his argument.

Holloway does not want the roles of the members of the Trinity to be diminished because the acts are always those of the one God.

And this is exactly what Fr Holloway does also by coining the phrase familiar to readers of this magazine: The Unity - Law of Control and Direction.

It should be said that while Holloway did not, as far as I can discover, reflect upon the relationship between the ordained priesthood and the priesthood of the faithful, he had a high view of the lay apostolate of the baptised.

It is true that Holloway did not write in a typically academic style, he did not have the time or the leisure to cross-reference his work with yards of footnotes, and it is true that he was «only» a parish priest but these factors alone surely do not justify the dismissal of his work.

By «Synthesis» Holloway did not mean an all - encompassing intellectual straightjacket - a neatly packaged last word on every detailed talent of knowledge - far from it.

While Holloway did not elaborate on this point, I think it is reasonable to say that Holloway most certainly saw sexual intercourse as uniquely «the» marriage act and thus not just on the same level as other acts a coupledo together.

When you don't know when to get out, you end up like Natalie Holloway did in Aruba.

Not exact matches

Arguably Holloway is doing no more than drawing out the implications of St. Paul's claim that in Christ God has «made known to us in all wisdom and insight the mystery of his will, according to his purpose which he set forth in Christ as a plan for the fulness of time, to unite all things in him, things in heaven and things on earth.»

Far more inspiring during seminary years was listening to Edward Holloway who linked priestly celibacy directly to Jesus Christ and to priestly loving, making it emerge clearly that celibacy is not something a priest grits his teeth and does, but is more a continual state of being, in relationship to Christ, which has its own specific way of giving and receiving love.

In one of the notes he wrote to the memoir prepared by his mother Agnes, Fr Holloway tells the story being stopped from doing a doctorate by his tutor at seminary.

If this pamphlet has interested you in Edward Holloway, may we suggest that the best result is to read his works if you have not already done so.

I don't deny the inadequacy of the particular version of Thomism - perhaps typical at the time - to which Fr Holloway may have been exposed, nor its need for reform and renewal.

Like Polanyi, Fr Holloway sees that «the paradox of all these totalitarian philosophies is that they emanate from the minds of individuals, and their intrinsic certainty does not therefore transcend the individual and limited minds from which they proceed.»

In Holloway's perspective the truths of modern science do not corrode the truth of Revelation nor do they add new elements to Revelation.

Holloway goes on to recount another experience of rejection following Vatican II «for refusing to go along with the New Theology and publicly rebuking bishops for their rave reviews of Hans Kung and others» adding ruefully, «I never did win.»

Sex in the Plan of Creation Holloway, in keeping with the Scotist vision of the Incarnation promoted by this magazine, argues not simply that the coming of Christ was part of the plan of creation but that the division of the sexes was planned as the means by which the Incarnation would be possible: «God did not fashion sex «for loving» but that the Incarnation might be the gift of creation from the potential of its own resources for the enfleshing of God».

This said, lest Holloway might seem to be reacting excessively to the popular equation of sex and «making» love, Holloway's use of the term «concomitant» indicates that he does truly see sex and «making» love as belonging together.

Holloway follows the traditional notion of the «remedy for concupiscence», saying that it is permitted to seek sex «for the tempering of disordered natural desire», [7] «in remedium concupiscentiae», as long as this is done in such a way as not to thwart the primary end of the act.

Holloway, in his Perspectives Volume One, and Faithmagazine, in its September 2006 editorial, each in their own way, seek to do both.

For Holloway, therefore, Mystery «does not mean incomprehensible, but «comprehensible till lost in the distance».»

Analogy Through the Human Being God's fullness of Existence, His very infinity of Act of Being and completeness, do not destroy the possibility of analogy for Holloway.

As Holloway puts it, «It involves also «I», «myself and again «myself in a threefold and different relativity, and in doing this it realises «me» as me, itdoes not disintegrate but manifests the unity of my person.»

Divine love «is so awe - full that it does cause pain — one realises one's own nothingness and the immensity of God's goodness,» to quote Agnes Holloway.

We also publish a brief extract from it in our «Holloway on...» section — though extracts can hardly do justice to the breadth of the book's vision.

«I first met Fr Edward Holloway when I was at Imperial College — I was doing a degree in chemical engineering, and was secretary of the Catholic Society and he came to give a talk.

Consciously to choose to engage in an act that lacks its fullness is significant, and Holloway is attempting to articulate this, but he does not mean to suggest that the act is thereby somehow not «good».

Holloway affirms that «we are not to do evil that good might come» and that «we should not endorse a wicked political leader, even if he holds out the promise of forestalling greater evils.»

Holloway consistently points out that the Church is not some Presbyterian gathering of believers who happen to come together because it is convenient to do so.

This is in the spirit of Edward Holloway's Sexual Order and Holy Order pamphlet available from our subscriptions address or free online at http://www.faith.org.uk Did God make a mistake when he created two sorts of us, male and female?

This corrosion of faith can be answered and reversed but in order to do so we must, as Holloway says, realise «the need for personal prayer, penance, humility, and union with God by meditation and mystical communion,» [10] so that thereby the Word of God will be manifested in our world not as «the breath of any imaginary pale Galilean, but the splendour and dynamism of God in the power of the Spirit,» Jesus Christ «the bringer in of the enormous vision that is splendid, the majesty of the Intellect of God and of Man, the fullness of the Kingdom on Earth which God has made for Man, and can bring to consummation only in and through His creature, Man.»

Again humility does not prevent us from referring the reader to Holloway's realism - as for instance discussed in our January 2009 editorial.

Holloway's perspective does not appear to differentiate these relationships so starkly.

God as Environer Holloway's book, Catholicism: A New Synthesis, does not present the self - communication of God as something that actually constitutes the human person as such.

I don't realistically see Holloway or Ortega moving up in 2018.

I don't see Ian Holloway making such a grand gesture and yet even the Tangerines aren't likely to challenge for the Premier League trophy either.

Minutes later Holloway appeared to have been stopped by several tacklers, but each time he wriggled free and when he was done he had run 20 yards for another TD as the Volunteers held off Tech 20 - 14.

He cheated against Mendes and hit him with shots after the bell, he ran from Holloway for a year and a half and did everything he could to get out of fighting Conor.

What kind of a clueless idiot do you have to be to think Ortega could beat Holloway.

I don't think Max has as much of a chance as Tony did at beating Khabib, but you can never rule out someone as tough as holloway.

I would even argue that Max Holloway has done more impressive things than DJ.

After Holloway had to pull out there has been a lot of speculations about what the UFC will do with the UFC222 main event spot.

Yes I respect Max Holloway like crazy for taking this fight but I don't agree with it.

Well Conor beat Dustin with ease... Dustin didn't beat Alvarez, yet Conor destroyed Alvarez... Conor just like Dustin beat Holloway and Brandao.

Those numbers seem a little optimistic to me since that would have put it in DC vs Jones 2 territory, which I don't see regardless of how awesome Khabib vs Ferg / Holloway seemed.