Sentences with phrase «hot tubbing»
In short, "hot tubbing" refers to a process where multiple experts in a particular field discuss and give evidence on an issue together, usually in a legal setting. It allows for a more collaborative and open discussion of the topic, often leading to a better understanding and resolution. Full definition
The London Times reported on 10 March that UK litigation lawyers are «bracing themselves» for the «revolution» of hot tubbing which will shortly be run in a pilot trial in Manchester, England.
slaw.ca
Back at our hotel, my friends and I indulged in plenty of nighttime hot tubbing, followed by a bit of wading in the surf.
I love going late night hot tubbing and I enjoy myself and go out quite a bit;) I...
Maybe hot tubbing is the way to go with personal injury claims.
In this issue: Pay - when - paid clauses; The cost of hot tubbing; Striking out unfair contract terms in civil law jurisdictions; Getting on with the job; Conferences and events.
Family, friends, experiences, travel, freedom to say and do what I want, sports, relationships, the online community, hot tubbing with drinks, food and enough money to not have to worry.
I enjoy camping, fishing, travelling.walks on the beach, sunsets, hot tubbing, cruises, dining in, dining out, all kinds of music, cuddling, kissing...
With the staff, Chema, Demaris, & Suzanna pampering us, the fabulous view, the ocean breezes, hot tubbing, ziplining, and boat tour with Captain «Eagle Ey», Mani & John, massages at the villa day after day, Cluadio every morning... everything was paradise!
We actually came across several situations in interviews where judges had taken concurrent evidence by video link («hot tubbing» — conjures up an image I always find a little off - putting!).
5) Hot tubbing of expert witnesses, or single court appointed expert witnesses unless there is a clear reason why multiple competing experts are required.
But hot tubbing is not going to solve the pervasive problem of «opinions for hire».
In the July 2011 issue of Canadian Lawyer, we wrote about «hot tubbing» — the term was coined in Australia to describe the procedure of organizing all experts in a case into a panel and hearing their evidence concurrently.
The sixth point deals with «hot tubbing,» where opposing parties» experts give their evidence at trial concurrently.
Hot tubbing is a great idea, in the right case (and I have actually used it successfully in a pre trial environment involving a very complicated medical causation issue).
It will require the co-operation of counsel for the more radical changes of having experts confer before trial and / or testify concurrently at trial — commonly known as «hot tubbing» — to become standard practice.
They must now also be able to demonstrate skills in giving oral testimony in «hot tubbing» situations.
Hot tubbing, the practice of experts giving evidence concurrently, is assisting the courts, saving time and reducing costs, according to a poll of 154 experts by the Expert Witness Institute.
Meanwhile, a poll of 154 experts by the Expert Witness Institute has found that «hot tubbing» — the practice of experts giving evidence concurrently — is assisting the courts, saving time and reducing costs.
Hot tubbing has enjoyed considerable support from senior members of the bench in Australia, where it originated.
Two arguments made in support of hot tubbing are the court's need for independent and objective expert evidence, and the reduction of court time needed to hear the evidence.
More formally known as «concurrent evidence», hot tubbing is a new method of presenting expert evidence at trial.
Hot tubbing is an excellent illustration of how our traditional rights - based legal system, developed over centuries, can adapt to modern conditions.
For now, the practice of hot tubbing is fairly new to Canada and not used all that often, but we'll watch to see if there's an increase in its use.
A pretrial version of hot tubbing has been added to the Ontario Rules: without prejudice meetings between opposing experts are now among the directions a judge can give where a trial is ordered on a summary judgment motion (Rule 20.05 (2)(k)-RRB-.
It certainly sounds odd, but «hot tubbing» — as the term is used in the context of expert evidence — just might be a way to fix Ontario's broken accident benefits system.
Ian Hull notes that hot tubbing «can also have its downsides if one expert tends to dominate the other in presenting their evidence, or if the experts do not respond well to the more collaborative approach.»