As EPA acknowledges in that analysis, the Senate entry in the Statutes at Large is a «conforming
amendment» (a clerical revision); in contrast, the
House - passed version is a «
substantive»
amendment (pp. 187 - 193).
After throat - clearing describing the Senate's roles as a legislative chamber of «sober second thought,» and one in which both the regions of Canada and minorities, not well represented in the
House of Commons, could have a voice, the
substantive part of the Court's opinion begins with a discussion of the nature of the Canadian constitution and constitutional
amendment.