Sentences with phrase «human research protections»

This study has been approved by the Shandong University Human Research Protections Program.

Through the Office for Human Research Protections, the Department is committed to working with institutions and IRBs to identify efficient ways to optimize utilization of resources, and is committed to developing guidelines for appropriate staffing and workload levels for IRBs.

For human studies, Awardee institutions must safeguard the rights and welfare of individuals who participate as subjects by reviewing proposed activities through an Institutional Review Board (IRB) as specified by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office for Human Research Protections, DHHS OHRP (http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/).

Assistance with regulatory requirements associated with FDA - regulated research and with compliance with NIH and HHS Human Research Protections Program (HRPP) requirements.

The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) provides the Human Subject Regulations Decision Charts as a guide for institutional review boards (IRBs), investigators, and others who decide if an activity must be reviewed by an IRB under the requirements of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regulations at 45 CFR part 46.

The dispute has divided the bioethics community and pitted the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which funded the infant study, against the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), the federal watchdog for research ethics.

Mary Faith Marshall, chair of the National Human Research Protections Advisory Committee, describes researchers?

Guidance, laws, and procedural safeguards emerge, such as the Belmont Report (5)-- the «Common Rule» — the code of federal regulations governing all federally funded research with humans, the establishment of the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), and national advisory committees such as the National Human Research Protections Advisory Committee (NHRPAC).

Also, NHRPAC was formed to advise the government and research community about human research protections.

Attacked by critics who insisted it wasn't ethical to use the drug on young patients who weren't yet psychotic, McGlashan says he supplied «about 200 pounds» of supporting documentation to the federal Office for Human Research Protections before he got a green light to continue.

DHHS plans to replace NHRPAC with a group called the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections.

The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), an office within the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), develops policies to protect human subjects and monitors clinical trials at research institutions.

The National Human Research Protections Advisory Committee (NHRPAC), a committee of scientists, lay patient advocates, lawyers, professional society members, and ethicists, previously advised DHHS on research matters, but — in a politically charged decision — its charter was allowed to expire recently.

The study has received the approval of the administration of the Souissi Maternity Hospital in Rabat, as well as the approval of the ethics committee for biomedical research at the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy in Rabat, registered with the Office for Human Research Protection of the US Health and Human Services Department (Registration Number: IORG0006594).

A task force meeting on 6 and 7 May in Washington, D.C., will feature «invited speakers from the National Academies, the American Chemical Society, the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Board, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Oak Ridge National Lab, Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs, Campus Safety, Health, and Environmental Management Association, and American Biological Safety Association,» according to the announcement.

We obtained permission from an original study investigator (B Leelarthaepin, coauthor) and approval from the Office of Human Research Protection to recover, analyze, and interpret de-identified SDHS data stored on a 9 track magnetic tape.

The study was approved by the Yale Institutional Review Boards for ethical research (Human Research Protection Program) and participants signed a consent form with the sampling company (SSI) through which they chose to participate.

The Office for Human Research Protection interprets 45 CFR part 46 to require IRB review as soon as an activity meets the definition of research, regardless of whether the activity began as «health care operations» or «public health,» for example.

Recognizing the need for and value of greater uniformity and public accountability in the review and approval process, HHS, with support from the Office of Human Research Protection, National Institutes of Health, Food and Drug Administration, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, has engaged the Institute of Medicine to recommend uniform performance resource - based standards for private, voluntary accreditation of IRBs.

The overall objective is to assess the impact of numerous, interrelated, ACEs on a wide variety of health behaviors and outcomes.29 The ACE Study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the Southern California Permanente Medical Group (Kaiser Permanente), Emory University, and Office of Human Research Protection, Department of Health and Human Services (formerly Office of Protection from Research Risks, National Institutes of Health).

Not exact matches

That trial produced the Nuremberg Code of 1946 that began to provide protection for human subjects of research and inspired, in due course, the Declarations of Helsinki in 1964 and 1975.

As we read this history, the furor over stem cells was fueled by numerous factors: the near - universal human desire for magic; patients» desperation in the face of illness and their hope for cures; the belief that biology can now do anything; the reluctance of scientists to accept any limits (particularly moral limits) on their research; the impact of big money from biotech stocks, patents, and federal funding; the willingness of America's elite class to use every means possible to discredit religion in general; and the need to protect the unlimited abortion license by accepting no protections of unborn human life.

Examples are 9/11 hijackings, The holding back of stem cell research that could save countless human lives, Aids being spread due to religious opposition to the use of condoms, Christians legally fighting this year to teach over 1 million young girls in America that they must always be obedient to men, the eroding of child protection laws in America by Christians, for so called faith based healing alternatives that place children's health and safety at risk, burning of witches, the crusades, The Nazi belief that the Aryans were god's chosen to rule the world, etc... But who cares about evidence in the real world when we have our imaginations and delusions about gods with no evidence of them existing.

Publicly formulated guidelines from Health and Human Services, the Office for the Protection of Human Subjects in Research, the World Health Organization and World Scientific and Technological Associations should stringently guide all technical endeavor — especially when there is a temptation to act solely in terms of the profit factor.

Animal Research: For nearly four decades, the animal liberation movement has been at war with medical research conducted on animals — even though conducting such experiments before trying new drugs or procedures on people is a crucial human rights protection established in the NurembeResearch: For nearly four decades, the animal liberation movement has been at war with medical research conducted on animals — even though conducting such experiments before trying new drugs or procedures on people is a crucial human rights protection established in the Nuremberesearch conducted on animals — even though conducting such experiments before trying new drugs or procedures on people is a crucial human rights protection established in the Nuremberg Code.

Formaldehyde has been recognized as a probable human carcinogen by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and as a known human carcinogen by the Int» l Agency for Research on Cancer.

Her primary focus was the conduct of clinical research and the system of human - subject protections, and the regulatory system for dietary supplements.

On October 26, AAAS commented on an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking related to human subjects research protections

There is now a recognized need for systematic social scientific research and analysis to expand knowledge about the promotion and protection of human rights.

Landman offers a systematic synthesis of social scientific research and analysis to expand knowledge about the promotion and protection of human rights.

(The authors described their report as covering protection of human research participants at UM with «special attention» to adults who may lack decision - making capacity.)

The group says doctors violated ethical and legal protections, including the Nuremberg Code and the Common Rule regulating federal research on human subjects.

The report is replete with examples of the social controversies involving science and technology at that time - the biological and environmental effects of nuclear weapons testing, DDT and other dioxins, the use of defoliants and herbicides by the U.S. military in Vietnam, the safety of nuclear power plants, the ban on fetal research, a moratorium on recombinant DNA research, the need for human subject protections and informed consent in genetics research, the misuse of psychology as a tool for torture, the implications of national security controls on science; misconduct in science, and the role of and protections for whistleblowers - many of which continue to resonate in the science and society relationship of today.

Certainly, the NIH policy — requiring that scientists be trained in the protection of human research subjects — is a done deal; however, the public has until 21 August to comment on the draft PHS policy.

Although courses on the protection of human subjects will not be evaluated by the NIH, universities and research institutions will have to provide their own «educational programs» for their investigators.

On 3 November, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Donna Shalala proposed new regulations that researchers must follow in order to access and use electronic human subject information — to offer federal protection of medical and health research data generated, stored, or transmitted electronicHuman Services (HHS) Secretary Donna Shalala proposed new regulations that researchers must follow in order to access and use electronic human subject information — to offer federal protection of medical and health research data generated, stored, or transmitted electronichuman subject information — to offer federal protection of medical and health research data generated, stored, or transmitted electronically.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is planning to shut down a grant - making center that supports leading - edge research on human exposure to pollution and its effects.

In South Asia, a region of deep poverty where one - fifth of the world's people live, new research suggests that by the end of this century climate change could lead to summer heat waves with levels of heat and humidity that exceed what humans can survive without protection.

Tom Solomon, director of the United Kingdom's Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging Infections based at the University of Liverpool, says he is also considering a trial of the therapy in humans.

The Obama Administration is exploring fundamental reforms to human subjects protections — actions that are being driven in part by the fact that technological advances, especially in genomics and computing, have made the notion of «de-identifying» a research participant's biological sample virtually impossible.

The committee's first report, Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs, was issued in 2001.

The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979).

A pattern of «crisis and response» has prompted an evolution of research ethics to the current system of human subjects protections in the United States.

James O. Sickman, an environmental scientist at the University of California, Riverside, has conducted research on lakes in the Sierra Nevada — the most sensitive lakes in the U.S. to acid rain, according to the Environmental Protection Agency — and described human impacts on them during the 20th century.

This means that the institution, whether a public university or a private sponsor, must establish a human research participant protection program (HRPPP) with multiple levels of responsibility and accountability, from the IRB (which, by federal law, prospectively reviews all federally funded human subjects research protocols) to the chief administrator (Chancellor or CEO) to the investigator, staff, and students, to the research participants.

But in 1976, the U.S. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research — the country's first bioethics policy effort — issued a report that effectively brought human challenge experiments in prisons to a Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research — the country's first bioethics policy effort — issued a report that effectively brought human challenge experiments in prisons to a human challenge experiments in prisons to a halt.

«This study provides correlational evidence for active anti-interferon antibodies providing protection from type 1 diabetes, but more research is needed to prove causation in humans.

[Box 26] AAAS and Congress, lobbying, 1959 - 1987 Congress, 1986 Arctic, 1981 Legislative Branch, 1981 - 1984 Executive Branch, pre-1985 OMB Circular, 1983 Science Policy: A Working Glossary, 1978 Science Policy Task Force Congressional Research Service, 1986 Environmental Protection Agency House Committee on Science and Technology, 1986 Office of Management and Budget Office of Science and Technology Policy, 1982 Office of Technology Assessment, 1980 Senate State Department (2 Folders) AAAS Science, Engineering, and Diplomacy Fellows, Lunch and Orientation, 1983 Tax Bills, 1981 Edwards vs Aguilard, Louisiana Creationist Suit, 1986 Edwards vs Aguilard, NAS amicus brief Edwards vs Aguilard, People for the American Way amicus brief Edwards vs Aguilard, Supreme Court arguments Hutchinson vs. Proxmire, amicus brief, 1978 Southeastern College vs. Frances Davis, amicus brief, 1979 State Department, 1976 - 1984 Human Subjects Research, 1979 Controversy over Inhaber Article in Science, 1979 Three Mile Island, 1979 Federal appropriations, universities and pork barrel projects

Thomas W Geisber, an expert on Ebola and siRNAs at The University of Texas Medical Branch, said the research was «highly significant because it shows protection against Ebola in a robust model of human disease: non-human primates.»

The Commission had answered that: i) the scientific knowledge need animal research, ii) animal experiment remained important for the protection of the human and animal health, and to protect the environment, iii) the commission did not intend to repeal the current directive.