Human justice by itself can never guarantee that truth will triumph.
Not exact matches
Motivated
by a regard for
justice and
human rights, these activists are «bring [ing] out the hidden tension that is already alive.»
Assange and his attorney said Britain's vote to leave the European Union could complicate his situation
by limiting his ability to appeal to the European Court of
Justice or the Council of Europe, a European
human rights body.
Joined
by the other three members of the court's liberal wing,
Justice Stevens said the majority had committed a grave error in treating corporate speech the same as that of
human beings.
For years, trade and
justice activists have proposed renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement to address some of the deal's most damaging features: for example,
by removing the anti-democratic investor - state dispute settlement provisions of Chapter 11, linking trade benefits to genuine protections for
human and labour rights (all the more important given the deteriorating democratic situation in Mexico), and establishing a continent - wide strategy for auto investment and production. We were always told that renegotiating NAFTA was a pipe dream: it would not be possible to open the text and get all three countries on board with reforms, no matter how legitimate the concerns.
There's Arkansas, bounty hunters, snakes real,
human, and symbolic, being rescued from a snake pit
by a very errant knight, a display of the gratuitous slaughter that comes when you take the law in your own hands, a deep commentary on place, displacement, the state of nature, and the techno - forces of the modern world and modern government, solidly American thoughts on law, property,
justice, and keeping your word, and so forth and so on.
They also argue that the amnesty the South African government granted to perpetrators of
human rights under apartheid in exchange for their testimony before the Truth Commission compromised
justice and could be defended only if it were necessary for a transition to democracy, not
by any idea of reconciliation.
The establishment of
justice and acts of compassion should be done at the lowest, most
human levels of society, instead of
by distant, centralized bureaus - a perspective fully consistent with the designs of America's founders.
1) Men and nations are governed
by moral laws; and those laws have their origin in a wisdom that is more than
human — in divine
justice.
Justice For Children International is
by no means alone, we are a founding members of Stop the Traffik, a major global coalition with over 300 member organisations based out of the U.K. Stop the Traffik works together to help stop the sale of people, to see the traffickers prosecuted, and to protect the victims of
human trafficking and those vulnerable to this crime.
In the light of the Biblical vision of the Garden of
Justice, Shalom, and Harmony (Integrity) of Creation, these religious and cultural resources, particulary appropriated
by the poor and oppressed, can be revitalized to be flowers, fruits and even roots of various elements in the Garden of God, in which
humans are gardeners.
The law and order of goodness and
justice was broken
by the first
human beings, and this had a devastating effect on all of humanity since then.
A third, a physician in New York City, praised the Catholic tradition for its emphasis on
human dignity and social
justice, but added: «I am troubled
by the fact that I find greater acceptance of myself as a whole person in my professional community as a physician, than I do in the official hierarchy of the church of my family, my childhood, and my life.»
Marketology, the insatiable appetite of gargantuan MNCs, has no soul to be damned but, driven
by Mammon, is commoditizing
humans, thereby annihilating democratic accountability and social
justice and State undertaking to implement basic
human rights.
nothing makes the atheist more ticked off more than when you bring up GOD... God gets all the blame for all the tragedy in the world... If there wasnt a god in the first place,
humans would not know tragedy or injustice when we see it... it would be a non-issue to us... survival of the fittest would not permit the emotions of love, compassion, empathy... Darwininian theory could not allow any of those and many other of the best of people's capacity for caring to surface... You cant explain it away
by synapse or neurons... without a Supreme Being, there would be no sense of
justice or injustice, we would not call it anything because there is no Ultimate Moral Standard to compare it.
The death - of - God school tells us that the picture of God we have just outlined, save for its inclusion of love and moral
justice when modified
by love, has died on those who have discovered the reality of
human freedom, the
human capacity to act significantly, and the responsibility we have for acting in freedom.
The particular mechanisms employed depend on circumstances of history, geography, and culture, and decisions about them can be made responsibly only
by taking account of man's acquisitive propensities, his need for rational order, his longing for freedom, and his sense of
justice — in short,
by relying on an integral rather than a truncated conception of
human nature.
This is only fair, and returns us to the system of divine
justice described in the Proverbs: the good are rewarded and the bad are punished in this life
by the all - powerful Lord of
human destinies.
When we are dealing in general with the gradual development of the noosphere into planetary consciousness we must of course do full
justice to the great, the essential part played
by the other sections of the
human race in bringing about the eventual plenitude of the earth.
In chiding
Justice Kennedy he wrote: «It is one thing for a society to elect change; it is another for a court of law to impose change
by adjudging those who oppose it hostis humani generis, enemies of the
human race.»
It is hoped that the socialist society, as visualized
by Marx, gives people more social
justice and security, more
human dignity, more free time, better standards of living etc..
No criminal
justice system in the history of the
Human race, even those established
by the most despotic of tyrants, comes close to matching the unfathomable barbarity of this «infinitely benevolent» god.
And it affirms that
justice and peace require the protection of
human rights
by the rule of law.
Other factors inhibiting the church from developing a new understanding of creation are the patriarchal nature of the ecclesiastical establishment and the expectation of a millennial period in which
human strife will be overcome and superseded
by a reign of peace and
justice.
But there is simply too much order in our world, too much constancy in our habits, too much
justice in our norms for us to think that the course of
human events is not somehow channeled
by God's providential plan.
I surely would not wish to argue that the fallen
human's knowledge of or capacity for
justice was unimpaired
by the fall.
And then,
by an act which will summarise the toil of centuries,
by this act (finally and for the first time completely
human)
justice will ensue and all things be renewed.
In Kagan's account, Niebuhr's distinctive warnings about the temptations of
human power are absent» as are his concerns about the perils of hubris and overreaching
by those who are overly confident of the efficacy of power and
justice in the world.
We think of heaven as a place where perfect love will render
justice unnecessary
by showing how impossible it is to achieve in
human terms, rather than as the place where the power of love will make
justice finally possible.
@Roger Bolero «societies ruled
by athiests have no concept of love or
justice, just a will to power and disregard for
human life and rights.»
I knew also that any effort I might make on behalf of
justice would be triggered
by my own lack of self - esteem and
by the painful inclination to identify with the underdog, rather than
by the
human and sexual impulse to work for
justice on the basis of a strong confidence in both myself and the power of God to love.
No criminal
justice system in the history of the
Human race, even those established
by the most despotic of tyrants, comes close to matching the unfathomable barbarity of your «infinitely benevolent» god.
A realistic appraisal of
human nature leads to a view of democracy as a dyke against the flood of self - interest, as a means of approaching basic
justice in relationships between people who are
by nature inclined toward injustice because they look first to their own advantage.
It may well be said that the [acceptance of man] in - spite - of [his sin] character of the Christian faith,
by means of prophetic criticism and the «will to transform» based upon divine
justice, functions as a militant element in the realm of
human society and history, whereas the just - because - of [
human sin and selfishness acceptance] nature of Buddhist realization,... functions as a stabilizing element running beneath all social and historical levels.
«If the image of God and the law of God were completely obliterated from man's soul
by sin, if no «faint outlines» of the original remained, men would have no conception of
justice, righteousness, or peace to use as the foundation of the
human standards of equity.
I have been compelled, especially
by Paul Shepard, to a deep appreciation of primal existence and to the recognition that I failed abysmally to do
justice to this longest - lasting of all forms of
human existence.
By extension every good deed, every struggle for
justice and deliverance from oppression, every effort to care for and show concern about those who are in need, will be not merely a reflection of the divine mercy and righteousness but also an instrument for the bringing about of just such shalom or «abundance of life» for God's
human children, So one might go on, almost without ceasing, to show that response in faith to the action of God in this vivid moment has its implications and applications for the whole range of
human life and experience.
It is also why the insistent
human belief that
justice for all people and deliverance from oppression and servitude is met
by the divine Love that labors for precisely such
justice and freedom.
In doing this, we have also seen how one of the consequences of authentic preaching is a determination, established in the hearts and minds and wills of those who have assisted at worship, to give themselves more fully to the service of God — as «co-creators», in Whitehead's fine word, with God in the great work of «amorization», establishing in this world (so far as a finite order will permit it) a society marked
by caring,
justice, responsibility, interest in others, and relief from oppression, devoted to everything positive which promotes the fullest actualization of
human possibility.
The first concerns the non-Christian defense of an appeal to
human values — such as reason,
justice, culture —
by those who share these values with the Christian but are not related to Christ.
The first hundred and fifty or so pages of his Leviathan show forth his attempt to paint that portrait of
human being, but
by almost universal agreement, he failed — that is, he could not both present
human being as a part of the new nature and at the same time do
justice to our direct experience of what it is to be
human.
She is certainly right that our
human notions of
justice do not seem to be backed
by the laws of nature as we know them and the way things happen on this planet.
Then there is wisdom,
human wisdom, man's intelligent ordering of his life, the serious employment of right reason, the attempt to find the proper way of life, the whole enterprise that takes form in political action and personal morality, in social work and poetry, in economic management and the building of temples, in the constant improvement of
justice by changing laws, in philosophy and technology, the manifold wisdom of man which is also inscribed in the wisdom of God and which may be an expression of this wisdom, the first of all God's works that rejoiced before him when he laid the foundations of the world (Proverbs 8:22 ff.).
The more prophetic forms of Christianity that press toward
human rights and social
justice are precisely those most under attack
by non-Christian militants at local levels, and many activists want to bring judgment against these religions.
An attitude which avoids both sentimentality and cynicism must obviously be grounded in a Christian view of
human nature which is schooled
by the Gospel not to take the pretensions of men at their face value, on the one hand, and, on the other, not to deny the residual capacity for
justice among even sinful men.14
The principal paths that have been followed are an apocalyptic, cataclysmic, second coming to put an end to the present world and the prophetic or social gospel kingdom that has accented the conquest of earth's evil
by human effort to increase love and
justice in response to God's call.
Some are better, some worse, carriers of divine
justice; democracy is better fitted than either fascism or Communism to bring about the kind of
human society willed
by God.
The faith
by which the church lives is centered in God who brings
human beings to fulfillment through the fellowship of persons in a community of
justice and reconciliation.
At this present time, in a period of decline in Christian faith and morals which is still unchecked, still sweeping even lower, it remains true that the teachings given men
by Christ, although whittled away and progressively abandoned, still preserve a better level of charity,
justice, and chastity in
human affairs throughout Christendom than prevails in those regions where the name of Christ has hardly entered, or where it is bitterly persecuted.
A finely tuned sensitivity to
human need and suffering may be a sufficient guide to action for the optimist who believes that the state can make everybody happy, but the realist who understands that every state rests on power and coercion is the one who most needs an ideal of power guided
by justice.