Lets put it in
Human terms here.
Not exact matches
In any case, I wish to make clear that both
terms are used
here in a broader sense, such that the liberal view of interest (or self - interest, or happiness) is simply one of the alternatives.2 In speaking of a private view of self - interest, I mean that
human community is thought to be solely instrumental to, i.e., not constitutive of, happiness.
And
here I note several different understandings of the place of
human beings in nature common in contemporary discourse, and acknowledge as well the conclusion implicit in my use of the
term «intermediate being.»
The words from Psalm 118 «Suscipe me, Domine» (receive me, Lord) are sung by those making profession as a monk or nun, and the teaching offered
here on the nature of vows speaks to anyone who sees their
human journey in
terms of vocation.
In
human and spiritual
terms the focus on the family for any struggle between conflicting worldviews is obvious since it is
here that cultural and religious values are primarily passed on.
e employ
human terms to communicate who God is, and
here is God in
human form among us in Jesus Christ.
Here in Christ is a focal manifestation in
human life of God the creative reality, a manifestation in
terms of action — and that action is on our
human plane and in our
human situation, speaking to our
human condition.
I will call these formative rights the rights to private liberties, where the
term «private» means
here that the freedoms in question can be defined without any explicit reference to
human association.
The point is that remarks about the potentially distorting and demonic effects of actions» locatedness do not need to be added extrinsically, as it were, to analyses of
human inquiry —
here theological inquiry in particular — cast in
terms of «action»; such remarks are entailed in the very concept of action.
Returning to the absolute commitment to
human rights outlined
here is right in
terms of Christian convictions and right in
terms of the interests of our nation.
So in case what has been expounded
here is correct, in case there is no incommensurability in a
human life, and what there is of the incommensurable is only such by an accident from which no consequences can be drawn, in so far as existence is regarded in
terms of the idea, Hegel is right; but he is not right in talking about faith or in allowing Abraham to be regarded as the father of it; for by the latter he has pronounced judgment both upon Abraham and upon faith.
Allow me to put this in sociological
terms (sociology provides a limited but useful «grammar»
here): Every
human society has its own corpus of officially accredited wisdom, the beliefs and values that most people take for granted as self - evidently true.
The
term is
here used to denote the Second Person of the Trinity in His unified assumption of
human nature in the Incarnation.
And
here too the content is theo - ethical; indeed, there is nothing
here corresponding to what we have
termed Yahweh's pentalogue, but a series in which every member has to do with the relationships of
human community.
Even
here there is a strange intermixture of the early and the later, as exhibited elsewhere in the Digha, for, in parts, Buddha is described in wholly
human terms, while in the latter part reference is made to the authority of the suttas, miracles of the Buddha, the building of stupas, and of Buddha relics, all clear evidences of the long growth of the Buddha tradition.
Now, you can live with your prudish Christian fantasy, and focus more on DIRTY FILTHY NASTY SE - X (which is what I think the abortion battle is REALLY about)-- or, if you truly care about
human life, you can focus on what works in
terms of reducing abortions, and
here's a hint — it's NOT abstinence!!!
thanks for the sensible comment fatboy yep i know i do get that they do nt really mean it, but i just cant come to
terms with that, i do nt really expect civilised culture in a sport but generally from the people in the world, yep you are right about the real world, maybe thats the reason it annoys me extremely, i mean look our world is rotten to the core, the
human mindset is terrible when it faces danger or problems for himself, and maybe thats the reason i just want football to stay as just as an entertainment industry but when i see that people even
here let the words flow in any kind of way just because the are frustrated, i really cant come to
terms with it, i really love black humor and some akbs react angrily when some fans tell some wheelchair jokes or for example on the post from admin where one could write jokes about wenger, some were really awesome, but when people cant control their emotion after a game and abuse other people it just irritates me as hell cause i really think that thats one of the big problems in the world..
Watford, westbrom, but to be honest i do nt blame losses on officials we get 90 mins to win games bit i think across the league its been poorer this year more than previous esp.linesman decisions i end up watching more than just the arsenal games but arsenal is where my heart and loyalty lies and its been week in and week across the league this year on officials i understand close offsides and fouls
here and there cause football has a tremendous gray area in
terms of constant action but linesman have missed multiple offsides by 5 yards and more and the consistency hasnt been there one week a call is this way next week the call is the other way but i am going to stop going on about officials as of now as you said and i agree its down
human error an apart of the game
The work of the Cabinet Office can often sound dry and technocratic, but
here it's sold in simple,
human terms.
«Although the work presented
here has yet to be replicated in
humans, we believe it provides good reason to investigate this relationship further in light of the simple and potentially powerful impact that seasonal flu vaccination could have on long -
term brain health.»
My point
here is we are entering a current of thinking, developed by a few scientists all over the world, reconsidering the time of
humans in
terms of multiple comet impacts, not all of them yet known.
So, what we did in this experiment
here, we gave 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, and so forth and we learned something really interesting which turned out to be really quite a momentous idea later because in
terms of this application to
humans, in
terms of this application to nutrition and health in general, what you can see in this particular presentation is that protein fed up to a level about 10 % of the calories, it..., it doesn't..., it doesn't turn on the cancer, but where..., when AS SOON AS THE PROTEIN BEGINS TO EXCEED 10 % THEN IT TURNS ON THE CANCER
Im new
here... im looking for a serious and long
term relationship... im not looking for a
human ATM machine or a
human BANK... i have my own source of income...
Like previous Pixar worlds we've visited in Toy Story, A Bug's Life, Inside Out and Monsters Inc., there feels like there were some good intentions
here in
terms of creating ideas for the world of The Good Dinosaur The idea that dinosaurs have evolved past the point of
humans and are now living in this Western landscape is never explored fully, and is instead sacrificed for the tried and tested «find our way home» story that has been a Pixar staple since Toy Story twenty years ago.
At times the spectacle seems distracting from the
human story, at other times his determination to ground the action in
human terms (with all the mortal dangers involved) becomes alarmingly intense, less a superhero action movie than a grim urban tragedy (Berg's on - the - job directorial training on the medical drama Chicago Hope comes in handy
here).
In
terms of goodies bought
here at home recently, I was pleasantly surprised to find an early copy of Osamu Tezuka's The Book of
Human Insects.
Here for the first time in modern psychology, I think it is fair to say, there has appeared at least an approach to a theory of the
human personality as a system, in both its cross-sectional and its temporal aspects of extension, with both cognitive and motivational emphases and couched in
terms of the action frame of reference.
Here's the thing: The
term «
human - grade» has no legal meaning.
Here's where it gets confusing: the
term «gluten» doesn't mean exactly the same thing in pet nutrition as it does in
human nutrition.
Macfarlane warns that «we have become titanic geological agents, our legacy legible for millennia to come» in an attempt to urge
human beings to consider the implications of our actions in
terms of «deep time» — beyond the
here and now.
Over the weekend, I posted and alerted senior members of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change when an errant description of the panel's 2007 conclusion on the
human climate influence found its way into an important draft document listing «elements of an outcome» for long -
term action on climate — essentially a draft of what may emerge
here when negotiations end on Friday.
Obviously, my method (likewise yours) ignores other long
term forcings - specifically CFC emissions that stopped in late 80s +
human aerosols seems to be important players
here - inclusion of other forcings may change the result.
Over an even longer -
term perspective, a strong case has been made by Ruddiman that
humans have been altering the climate of this particular interglacial for many centuries, as he looks at the null hypothesis to this quite closely,
here:
Which bears out my main contention
here — that there is now an overlap, at 2C, between mainstream climatology and lukewarmers, and the next step is to go see what a 2C elevation means in
terms of economic functioning of the
human species.
Here, we argue that the twentieth and twenty - first centuries, a period during which the overwhelming majority of
human - caused carbon emissions are likely to occur, need to be placed into a long -
term context that includes the past 20 millennia, when the last Ice Age ended and
human civilization developed, and the next ten millennia, over which time the projected impacts of anthropogenic climate change will grow and persist.
Here we offer alternative consequences of extensive and long -
term human management in coastal areas.»
«Cool» is an expansive
term of praise and a tool is just about anything that makes us
human, so there's something
here for everyone.
I get it, I am fine as long as I took an idea instead of actualization of an idea, and I think that is the case
here, since I took idea of conceptualizing
human's cognitive processes (work A) and social behavior (work B); where I changed the definition of the
terms (work C) and also the
terms itself (work D).
The issue
here, is that the
Human Rights Code does not define the
terms «employee» or «employment» within the statute.
So, either for living or subleasing, that's the future vision
here — to create a long -
term, sustainable
human habitation in LEO [low Earth orbit].»
They need to know what a person can do in
terms of office administration;
human resources, teaching or any other such field and a stylish resume will just not do
here.
We have to pause
here and take stock and take the time to think this through as a society... or we could end up with thousands of giant industrial wind turbines over great swaths of prime agricultural land and beautiful countryside and we don't know enough about what this could mean in
terms of
human health, agricultural land health, animal health, water table health, wildlife health, property value health, property tax health and so on.