Sentences with phrase «humanism if»

check out Humanism if you want a much better set of ethics to live a good life by.

Google: Secular Humanism if you are interested.

Not exact matches

If you want to label it, something close to «humanism».

... If Catholicity at the university level is to remain, Notre Dame had better be prepared to save itself, whether from «secular humanism,» a distorted view of academic freedom, or a goal of becoming [well - regarded] at the cost of its Catholic uniqueness...

I would submit you changed by deciding to love your neighbors and if you had explored Humanism instead you would have had the same result.

I would submit you changed by deciding to love your neighbor and if you had explored Humanism instead you would have had the same result.

However, if you had any rational critical - thinking skills, you would see that the quote (even taken out of context) is clearly one of Humanism.

People and the world in general would be far better off if people spent more time contemplating ethics and humanism.

Compare with James's view, quoted above, the following passage of Charles Hartshorne: «If it be asked how the individual can be aware of this infinite range if his experience is finite, the answer is that it is only the distinct or fully conscious aspect of human experience which is finite; while the faint, slightly conscious background embraces all past time» (Beyond HumanisIf it be asked how the individual can be aware of this infinite range if his experience is finite, the answer is that it is only the distinct or fully conscious aspect of human experience which is finite; while the faint, slightly conscious background embraces all past time» (Beyond Humanisif his experience is finite, the answer is that it is only the distinct or fully conscious aspect of human experience which is finite; while the faint, slightly conscious background embraces all past time» (Beyond Humanism.

Jesus is far from seeing man in the light of humanism, as if by a natural endowment or by his destiny to realize an ideal, he possessed in himself divinity or kinship to God.

What of the future — if we assume that membership shrinkage has stabilized, that fiscal stringencies have been effected, and that a theological convergence toward a religious humanism has not only occurred but has at last received official recognition?

And if you want to inquire into the foundations of von Balthasar's humanism, read Truth Is Symphonic.

Where Sartre seeks to recoup humanism through a methodology that allows him to debunk any competing ideology, Solzhenitsyn seeks to recover human integrity by attending to the particulars of history as part of a larger, if hidden, spiritual drama that must be lived to be understood.

Secular humanism «is» a philosophical viewpoint that encompasses such things as morality and your statement would be on only slightly less shaky ground if you had said that about humanism.

Theologian Henri de Lubac dealt with this issue at length in his masterful book, The Drama of Atheist Humanism: «If man takes himself as a god, he can, for a time, cherish the illusion that he has raised and freed himself.

If the interpretation is left to the minds and consciences of men, then the mind of Man is the final arbiter, and the final result, across four hundred years of research, argument, criticism and corrosive human doubt, is going to be Humanism in religion, the loss of all objective certainty and truth.

While Maritain sadly failed to go all the way with de Lubac in refusing pure nature, he still opposed Maurras, not only in the name of «the primacy of the spiritual» but also of an «integral humanism» for which the free and natural spheres of politics and culture must be oriented toward supernatural grace if they are to be fully human, just, and legitimate.

Finally, Hartshorne stresses the ethical and social defectiveness of humanism: if the total universe and even human bodies are essentially loveless machines driven by blind forces, «then it is impossible that the conception of spirit or love should have more than a very fitful hold upon us.

If Humanism does not do justice to religion, it certainly does take seriously what we called the spirit of secularism.

if you're looking for an atheist ethics system, try Humanism.

if you want an atheistic form of ethics, try Humanism.

if you compare Humanism to Christianity... well, there is no comparison.

He also observes that it claims that man is essentially alone in the universe and that he is better off if he is made fully aware of this loneliness.5 However, Hartshorne enters the counterclaim that, if man believes that he really is all by himself in an unfriendly universe, then man will realize that he is not worthy of his own supreme devotion and will also become an easy prey for the race - worship and nation - worship that wreak havoc on mankind.6 He further charges that humanism suffers from the specific disease of «megalomania» or wishing to be God.7

And finally, if religious activism breaks its ties with sacramental, mystical, and silent religion, it becomes indistinguishable from secular humanism, such as Marxism for example.

If Science say Irene is caused by global warming; & If Religion say it is an «act of God» whether in warning or punishment; & If Humanism say we have a problem - let's find a solution together.

if you want a better set of ethics, try Humanism, an atheistic ethical system far more compassionate than anything offered by the various christian cults.

If the great religions continue to waste their energies in a fratricidal war instead of looking upon themselves as friendly partners in the supreme task of nourishing the spiritual life of mankind, the swift advance of secular humanism and moral materialism is assured.32

Even if one of the traditional religious communities dominates the culture, it is now likely to be in competition with values stemming from the European Enlightenment — what I called scientific humanism.

I would submit you changed by deciding to love your neighbors and if you had explored Buddhism or Humanism instead you would have had the same result.

If I had intended secular humanism I would have said so.

Christianity and religious conflict had as much if not more to do with what occured during WW I and WW II as humanism did.

Bootyfunk, Your «acclaimed» humanism site is fluff - it - N - stuff - it reading material which few if any will read thoroughly let alone be able to fathom the unfathomable and quite strenuous reading of all out gibberish thoughts!

I Finally, if secular humanism continues to overrun christianity and / or if radical Islamists get here, none of the above will matter!

If you find yourself in conflict with someone like that, just imagine what the opposition is all about: secular laws vs religious laws, and racism vs humanism, to name but two of the many battlefields to be found here.

If we can take this document: http://thezeitgeistmovement.com/orientation#faq5 as a reasonable discussion of Zeitgeist's beliefs you'll notice in the section «The «Prima Facie» Fallacy» that this particular branch of Zeitgeist argues directly for a technocratic and anti-democratic control over production; as opposed to the humanism that the collective author claims to see in Marxist communism.

If collective worship was ended and RE became universally objective, fair and balanced (and included non-religious views such as Humanism), community schools would indeed be exactly what we would want a school to be — open and accommodating to all.

Certainly if the script and the cast can capture even a fraction of the humanism and insight of the original tales then the film will be onto a very good thing indeed.

If that all sounds a little high - minded and dry, it's saved from being so by an eclectic soundtrack, a palpable love of storytelling, deep humanism, righteous fury, bawdy humour and Gomes» startling ability to shuffle tones, genres and eras.

At the same time, if Leone understood the raucous humanism at the heart of Kurosawa, and Woo the insolent demystification of genre archetype of Leone, Rodriguez seems mainly to have ported the puerile macho fantasy of Woo while glancing off the deeper well of questions of honour and the mysterious bond between killers of men.

The fact that Eggers also happens to have «established» McSweeney's Books — responsible for publishing the title that the Times reviewer calls, «a kind of Death of a Globalized Salesman `, alight with all of Arthur Miller's compassion and humanism» — is casually mentioned on the inside page of the review, as if writing and self - publishing a great book was a regular occurrence.

The fact that Eggers happens to have «established» McSweeney's Books — responsible for publishing the title that the Times reviewer calls, «a kind of Death of a Globalized Salesman», alight with all of Arthur Miller's compassion and humanism» — is casually mentioned on the inside page, as if writing and self - publishing a great book was a regular occurrence.

Case in point, if your essay should be written for a human science coursework, you will get a writer with a humanism foundation.

Hadn't its inherent humanism and its private language of subjective investment been shown to be obsolete if not morally bankrupt?

If anything, this humanism, through art, celebrates mankind's ability to avoid being dominated by the powers governing world affairs.

As I have argued previously, vocal representatives on both sides the climate debate act as if they can't wait for the total defeat of science and humanism.