Humans think of things in terms of beginnings and endings.
Not exact matches
The only
thing that I can
think of is if
humans being there is inherently part
of the economy — and the only way that happens is tourism.
One
of the most intriguing
things about
human behavior is that most
of us
think that we can hide our
thoughts from others — but nothing could be further from the truth.
There are so many
things that have faced
human society that were completely incomprehensible to the original disciples and apostles, the early church, and yet the church endures, the church survives because the Gospel isn't tied to one particular time in history, one particular school
of thought, one particular framework.
One
thing I do know or have
thought about is
Humans can live for a short period
of time.
This challenge led to a finger - wagging review by Hitchens in The Atlantic and a series
of punch - counterpunch exchanges in various transatlantic venues, all
of which obscured both the thoughtfulness
of Amis» meditations on grief and his discovery
of the depths
of human depravity: «Hitler - Stalin tells us this, among other
things: given total power over another, the
human being will find his
thoughts turn to torture.»
I can't
think of a nicer
thing in the world personally to do for another
human being.
A modern banana, an ant, a bumble bee, a monkey (the ones you
think we came from), and the
human brain (among a million other
things created) disprove the theory
of evolution in just one sentence worth
of their description.
Yes — and I
think there is something in our
human nature that is about survival that while a good and necessary
thing to have can when mixed with none
of us being perfect lead us to perceptions and magical
thinking which may or may not be in touch with reality.
If a person
thinks that nature is wholly corrupt, that there is no natural morality knowable by
human reason, that grace completely supplants nature, that the basis
of morality is the divine command and not the essences
of things as created by God — and some Protestant theologians can plausibly be read as having said such
things — then all bets are off.
In this sense we say
things like, «it is in the nature
of human beings» or «it is natural for
human beings» to, for example, conceive and be conceived in male - female coitus, nurse their young, employ productive and practical reason, desire to know, live in walkable settlements,
think in symbolic narrative, live well, etc..
«I
think internalizing the fact that no opinion / belief / enthusiasm inoculates either you or anyone else from the baser aspects
of the
human condition, or the larger social milieu in which we all exist, is probably a very smart
thing to do.
The seventh lecture
of William James's pragmatism series bore the title «Pragmatism and Humanism,» and included the statement: «When we talk
of reality «independent»
of human thinking, then, it seems a
thing very hard to find.»
But sometimes we earthlings can not get much further in our
thinking about such
things as love, fidelity, commitment and caring than to summon forth the image
of some mama somewhere who will always be for us the concrete
human experience
of such divine ideas.
If so, take a look at our entire
human history for countless examples
of physical processes causing
things that we used to
think were magic.
A
thought, a harmony, the achievement
of a perfection in material
things, some special nuance in
human love, the exquisite complexity
of a smile or a glance, every new embodiment
of beauty appearing in me or around me on the
human face
of the earth: I cherish them all like children whose flesh I can not believe destined to complete extinction.
Just, Wise, Forknowing (he knows the future), He knows our inner
thoughts, He knows the intentions
of our hearts, He knows our needs, He's a good father (and if
human fathers try to give what kids need (bread, egg), they would net give»em bad
things (a stone, a scorpion), He's kind, He's welcoming.
This point
of view fully respects the progressive experimental concentration
of human thought in a more and more lively awareness
of its unifying role; but in place
of the undefined point
of convergence required as term for this evolution it is the clearly defined personal reality
of the incarnate Word that is made manifest to us and established for us as our objective, that Word «in whom all
things subsist.»
What they lost to was a radical, liberal read
of what Jesus» teaching was regarding
human equality and loving your «neighbor», and I
think the same
thing will win the day here.
i
think refusing to see another
human as an equal is a sin, refusing to acknowledge that children are small versions
of adults and have a lot
of insight on
things is a sin... but loving another
of the same gender isn't a sin, it's love.
And one
of the
things I've learned as a pastor and just as a
human being is how quickly we'll cling to a consoling
thought and insist on it's truth simply because it consoles us.
Something that we tend to forget, one
of the great
things that was allegedly gifted to us as
humans is the power to
think for ourselves.
In the development
of human thought and perception, the shift from primary orality to vowelised literacy involves the movement from an implicit sense
of things in concrete operational
thinking to explicit concepts articulated through abstract
thinking.
per · son · i · fy transitive verb: to have a lot
of (a particular quality): to be the perfect example
of a person who has (a quality): to
think of or represent (a
thing or idea) as a person or as having
human qualities or powers
God has given us much evidence
of His existence: how about the intricacies
of how the
human body works - can you really believe that happened without a master plan; what about the beauty
of nature - can we really
think that that just happened; what about the testimony
of millions throughout the ages including Scientists attempting to disprove God, that point to
things beyond their comprehension or doing.
If you
think it is amazing that evolution brought you such
things as
humans, just
think of all the other lifeforms, many that are much more advanced than
humans, that no doubt inhabit this vast universe.
Insane people
think Humans are some sort
of 4th magical being that's not in anyway related to animals despite that whole pesky «genetics»
thing pretty much guaranteeing we are.
It's not just life /
human nature / NATURE??? There are a lot
of beautiful
things in this world, but there is the uglier side as well... and to blaim it all on God — good or bad... well you might as well be living in the old testament... I am surprised there aren't still animal sacrifices to the angry, wrathful god that so many believe in... Oh, another question to the thumpers who believe that «God can be cruel» (And I really don't
think Stephen King would say any
of his work supports that)... So is God actually «perfect»?
Are you that arrogant as to honestly
think your form is the epitome
of any form and that a «
human being» is that much more important than any living
thing?
But on the other hand, when in talking about sin one talks only
of such sins, it is so easily forgotten that in a way it may be all right, humanly speaking, with respect to all such
things up to a certain point, and yet the whole life may be sin, the well - known kind
of sin: glittering vices, willfulness, which either spiritlessly or impudently continues to be or wills to be unaware in what an infinitely deeper sense a
human self is morally under obligation to God with respect to every most secret wish and
thought, with respect to quickness in comprehending and readiness to follow every hint
of God as to what His will is for this self.
Hardly more than Sölle do they encourage
thought of God as an agent alongside other agents, one who brings
things about in the world or in
human life.
With that said, I
think they do want the general belief in God, a general sense that goodness orders the universe, that love and peace and joy are all good
things, that
human rights actually matter, and that we can experience some sort
of mystical communion with God / the universe / whatever through spirituality.
Before we set out Whitehead's view, it should be noted that if his view really is a different way
of looking at real
things, then we will need to
think about freedom,
human action, responsibility, the meaning
of life, the self, etc. in a new way.
In sum, because it treats belief as an atomistic decision taken piecemeal by individuals rather than a holistic response to family life, Nietzsche's madman and his offspring, secularization theory, appear to present an incomplete version
of how some considerable portion
of human beings actually come to
think and behave about
things religious — not one by one and all on their own, but rather mediated through the elemental connections
of husband, wife, child, aunt, great - grandfather, and the rest.
Even if there is no serious sin in someone's life, bad
things happen to all people, and when these
things happen, the tendency
of the average
human being is to
think that God is punishing them for something.
You should too, and I
think you'll find that a vast number
of things which aren't just made up could indeed be natural occurrences that coincide with some significant
human endeavors.
I don't
think she quite feels the overpowering sense
of God's sovereignty over all
things, painful or pleasant, virtuous or perverse, in
human experience.
I
think the most disappointing
thing about religion (and I don't mean to offend here) is that it diminishes the idea
of human potential.
i have made a statement that all the
things that exist (including the immaterial
thoughts and ideas
of humans)-- exist within this very material universe.
i made a statement: all the
things that exist (including the immaterial
thoughts and ideas
of humans)-- exist within this very material universe.
To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil
thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless
of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need
of any partners but we the creation is in need
of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I
think we
human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws
of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life
of others, drug dealing,
human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one
of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law
of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws
of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside
of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence
of breaking the law
of the land but we do not see the punishment
of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures
of hereafter....
When we
think of all that has come from him in the impulse toward
human freedom and dignity — the challenge
of ignorance and the attempt to remedy it, the concern for and conquest
of disease, the sensitivity to the needs and plight
of the weak, destitute, helpless, and those in every kind
of suffering, the stabilizing
of the inner lives
of millions
of his followers around the world, and the fostering
of a prophetic attack on such giant social evils as prejudice, injustice, and war — when we consider the
things that have stemmed from this «penniless teacher
of Nazareth,» we are dull indeed if the wonder
of it does not sweep over our souls.
the Bible does judge a lot
of things as deserving
of the death penalty if we are to follow ur
thinking it hates all
humans.
Rick Perry is a nimrod, and this is just a way for him to try to look like a good guy and appease the idiots that
think prayer does a
thing outside
of making
humans think they can have any control.
Believing in God is much more pleasant, and we
humans are predisposed to experience emotions that feel like proof when we
think of things like a higher cause, morality, justice, etc..
That Man is the product
of causes which had no prevision
of the end they were achieving; that his origin, his growth, his hopes and fears, his loves and his beliefs, are but the outcome
of accidental collocations
of atoms; that no fire, no heroism, no intensity
of thought and feeling, can preserve an individual life beyond the grave; that all the labours
of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness
of human genius, are destined to extinction in the vast death
of the solar system, and that the whole temple
of Man's achievement must inevitably be buried beneath the debris
of a universe in ruins — all these
things, if not quite beyond dispute, are yet so nearly certain, that no philosophy which rejects them can hope to stand.
For one
thing, in a Jewish context «ethics» covers a much wider swath
of human behavior than what most people
think of when they use ethical categories.
So once again... if you deny that you engage in this basic
human practice
of accusing, condemning, and scapegoating others... if you
think that the people you call «monsters» and «heretics» truly are guilty
of everything you accuse them
of... if you
think that some people truly deserve to burn in hell for all eternity... if you
think that war is righteous and good and we need to bomb some groups
of evil people off the face
of the planet... then you are calling God a liar, and you have not understood the first
thing about God and what He taught through Jesus (cf. 1 John 4:7 - 11).
I
think that's exactly the kind
of thing we should expect from going deeper and realizing what types
of things are alive and well in our
human hearts.
seriously if all
humans stopped and
thought about it we are all just
human, nothing more nothing less and no more important in the grand scheme
of things than anything else in this universe.