Sentences with phrase «iasn immediate past»

After falling from Bowser's airship, Mario lands in a world ruled by hat - obsessed ghosts — a convenient twist given his immediate past.

Smart businesspeople like Buffett and Bill Gates know better than to focus too hard on the immediate past or the immediate future.

This annual gala brings together business, government, and community leaders to induct the Greater Vancouver Board of Trade's immediate past chair into its prestigious Council of Governors.

Each spring, this black - tie gala brings together business, government, and community leaders to induct the Board of Trade's immediate past chair into its prestigious Council of Governors.

The black - tie gala evening brings together business, government, and community leaders to induct the Greater Vancouver Board of Trade's immediate past chair into its Council of Governors and to honour the 2017 recipients of the Rix Awards for Community and Corporate Citizenship.

He is the immediate past Board Chair for Brand USA and continues as a member of the board.

He is past - chair of the board of Big Brothers Big Sisters of America and immediate past - president of the Northern Star Council of the Boy Scouts of America, and continues to serve on both boards.

During their discussion on Canada-U.S. relations, Premiers were joined by Christine Gregoire, Governor of Washington and immediate past chair of the National Governors Association, and Gary Doer, Ambassador of Canada to the United States.

Again, 2016 is notably different from the immediate past (2012 - 2015).

Creativity, then, makes an adjustment to its immediate past in the sense that the nature and character of each new instance of self - creativity undergo modification in conformity with the nature and character of the past.

Hence, a neuronal occasion in the human brain prehends the very minute disturbances of the electromagnetic field occasioned by other neuronal occasions in its immediate past, since these «minor» disturbances are absolutely essential for its own reaction (self - constitution).

If what makes an isolated unit of time impossible is the presence of the past and if the remote past is present in the same sense that the immediate past is present (differing only in the degree of influence), what is to keep the enduring present from expanding not merely to 12 seconds, but to a lifetime, and beyond that to all time?

When consciousness becomes its own intentional object, that which is reflected upon and that which is doing the reflecting are not one and the same; the consciousness which is reflected upon is always in the past — often the very immediate past, yet always a consciousness which has been.

Here the Schüler tend to disagree with the master (who argued that Jesus looked forward to this decisive event in the future, whereas Paul looked back upon it in the immediate past), in that they say that `..

The tension I have in mind is generated by (i) this process of temporally ordered actual occasions articulating his vision of the metaphysical ultimatum — atomism — and (ii) the complex product of this process which he so obviously cherished as an organic interconnectedness — the web of interrelations which comprise a world so badly misunderstood by the science Whitehead himself prehended from out of his immediate past.

Present «actual occasions» always attend to their immediate past, and anticipate to varying degrees their future, but they never interact with contemporaries.

[T] he vague efficacy of the indistinct external world in the immediate past is precipitated upon the representative regions in the contemporary present» (PR 172).

Primary memory assures the survival of the immediate past in the present moment of experience, as distinct from «secondary memory» which recalls a more distant past into present experience.

We do not, then, merely have in the present feeling a mingling of the immediate past, but also the immediate future anticipated.

There is the sense, for instance, of the derivation of one mental state from that of the immediate past.

Accordingly, the world is made up of actual occasions or entities, each of them actively prehending the actual entities of the immediate past and conforming to them — at least in the initial stages of formation.

In contrast stands the more basic perception in the mode of causal efficacy; which «is our general sense of existence, as one item among others in an efficacious external world» and «of derivation from an immediate past, and of passage to an immediate future»; its data «are vague, not to be controlled, heavy with emotion.»

An actual entity in a personal society prehends itself in its immediate past along with prehensions of other objectified past actual entities.

My own approach has been to turn to a naturalistic development of the scheme and suggest that by distinguishing between the remote past and the immediate past (a distinction other commentators, surprisingly, have not insisted upon) and dealing with each separately, a coherent account can be obtained.

The two concepts are (1) that of an actual entity in the immediate past of a concrescing entity which I will call the dominant past actual entity for that concrescing entity, and (2) a group of past actual entities which I will call the obliquely influential past actual entities of the concrescing entity in question.

The inhibition of symbolic reference frees the conceptual element as exemplified in presentational immediacy from its exemplification in causal efficacy and thus frees the symbol to carry meanings other than those conveyed by the immediate past (ME 80; S 6, 83f).

Process and Reality, An Essay in Cosmology 345 - 346 and 435 imply clearly that (b) is the alternative Whitehead had in mind, for in each passage he presents a situation where a given occasion, X, inherits from another occasion, Y, in its past, which in turn inherits from Z, which is in its past — the point of each passage is to say that X inherits doubly from Z, both immediately and as mediated by Y. Z is not in the immediate past of X, and yet X is exhibited as prehending Z directly.

In Adventures of Ideas 233 he writes: «The present moment is constituted by the influx of the other into that self - identity which is the continued life of the immediate past within the immediacy of the present.»

In this process the original physical feelings of causal efficacy are submerged (not eliminated) by an inrush of conceptual feelings, so that the throbbing causal world of the immediate past now appears as a passive display of qualities «presented» to our senses.

Much work needs to be done in clarifying the relationship between creativity on the one hand and inheritance from the immediate past on the other — I have begun this clarification in section I of Chapter 2 of my A Whiteheadian Aesthetic.9 It has been a characteristic of the Hartshornian group to play down the notion of creativity at the same time that they augment the importance of God — God has encroached on the role Whitehead assigned to creativity.

The fact is, however, that the immediate past has an extremely powerful influence on the immediate future.

As an organic unity, as «the one,» God is always in the past, the immediate past.

It grows out of the immediate past experiences, the body, its near environment, and, ultimately, out of the whole past world..

In the relational viewpoint the individual begins life as an effect produced by the many others in the world of his immediate past; But he is not simply a function of these relations.

But the sense of the conformation of the present to the immediate past, however insistent, lacks the clarity and definition of presentational immediacy.

Christian focuses his attention on the simplest case in which one actual entity prehends only one other actual entity in its immediate past by a simple physical feeling.

But the phenomenological description offered makes it clear that presentational immediacy is consequent upon a particular type of bodily amplification and selection of sense data derived from the stream of consciousness comprising the immediate past actual world, further abstracted and focused in the human situation through selective conscious attention to some, but not all, of the features of the immediate external world recorded and amplified by the body.

produces percepta which are vague, not to be controlled, heavy with emotion: it produces the sense of derivation from an immediate past, and of passage to an immediate future; a sense of emotional feeling, belonging to oneself in the past, passing into oneself in the present, and passing from oneself in the present towards oneself in the future, a sense of influx of influence from other vaguer presences in the past, localized and yet evading local definition....

On the societal model, the immediate past divine occasion extends throughout the entire universe.

The immediate past is the distant future.

Rather, it is a projection by a percipient subject onto a (fictitious) contemporaneous spatiotemporal manifold of certain highly refined and analyzed features of entities directly (but more vaguely and dimly) encountered in the percipient's immediate past through the mode of causal efficacy.8 The important distinction between true perception — what we might now in Rortyan jargon call nonmentalistic «unanalyzed raw feels» — and this second - order symbolic projection of select percepta characteristic only of higher - order conscious organisms is somewhat blurred by terming both equally «modes of perception.»

This notion of perishing pertains solely to objective being, to the way the immediate past fades as it recedes into the more remote past.

As long as a feature of the immediate past is positively included, there is repetition and therefore sameness.

We are also carried on by our immediate past of personal experiences; we finish a sentence because we have begun it....

Consequently, just as an actual occasion in the immediate past influences a newly concrescing occasion through its aim at fulfillment for it, God likewise influences individual persons through the particular propositions or aims at fulfillment which he entertains for them in each moment of experience (PPCT 386f.).

What he is concerned to show Is that since an actual occasion in even the immediate past of a concrescing occasion which it has influenced has already arrived at its term or satisfaction, and hence is no longer concrescing, in principle it makes no difference whether its prehensive objectification in the newly concrescing occasion originates in the immediate or the remote past.

The other variable has to do with the response of the concrescing occasion to this aim at its satisfaction by the occasion in its immediate past.

As I remember, Paul Natorp in his book on psychology said that introspection is really awareness of the immediate past.

In his terms, when we are not grossly deceived, we are having physical feelings or prehensions of the events in the immediate past in the region of space where we locate the patches of color.

Although the immediate past of an occasion of experience is felt or experienced with more intensity than the remote past, still in a dim way the whole universe and its past is synthesized into each of the moments of experience that taken together make up reality.