In Combs v. Bergen, the Plaintiff was injured in a motor vehicle collision, and brought
an ICBC claim against the Defendant for damages for pain and suffering, wage loss, diminished earning capacity, and cost of future.
[41] The plaintiff, in reply, submits that he understood that any settlement offers made by the
defendant were full settlements of both the tort claim and Part 7 claims against ICBC, and that at no time did defence counsel convey that Part 7 benefits would still be available in the event that the Defendant's Offer was
defendant were full settlements of both the tort
claim and Part 7
claims against ICBC, and that at no time did defence counsel convey that Part 7 benefits would still be available in the event that the
Defendant's Offer was
Defendant's Offer was accepted.