Sentences with phrase «icc arbitration case»

Co-Counsel for respondent in ICC arbitration case no. 10803 / ACS involving dispute over design rights for military bridges

Counsel for claimant in ICC arbitration case no. 16199 / GZ involving scope of bank guarantees and state aid exemptions

Co-Counsel for claimant in ICC arbitration case no. 14793 / JHN involving exit provisions in a joint venture

Not exact matches

The court (ICC) in determining the case struck out the Application made to it for arbitration because the court has established that the 2006 contract (signed between Waterville and the Government of Ghana) on which basis he (Woyome) is coming to them does not meet their «minimum requirement» because he (Woyome) * is not a beneficiary, not a signatory, and not a party to the 2006 contract signed between Waterville and the Government of Ghana....

However a statement from Mr Woyome's office said the decision as per ICC's article 6 (4) means that the case does not meet minimum requirement of the ICC for arbitration.

For example, a German court of appeal held that the parties had concluded a new arbitration agreement by signing ICC Terms of Reference.800 Similarly, a decision by the English House of Lords stated that «[i] n the present case one is dealing with an ICC arbitration agreement.

Symbion Power LLC v Venco Imtiaz Construction Company [2017] EWHC 348 (TCC)-- We acted successfully for the defendant, Venco, in this High Court case where the Court rejected an application to set aside an ICC arbitration award for serious irregularity under section 68 (2)(d) of the Arbitration Act 1996 on the basis that the tribunal had failed to deal with issues which were put to it.

Had the arbitration in the Bolivia case been an ICC arbitration or the proceedings in New York substantive ones; or had PDVSA had assets in England and been in the process of removing them to frustrate an arbitral award, the english court may well have asserted jurisdiction and chosen to exercise it.

As a member of Foley Hoag's International Litigation and Arbitration Department, González represents clients before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ), and in ad hoc arbitrations under the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), in cases concerning the environment, natural resources, and public health, among others.

In addition to her experience representing clients in international arbitration and litigation cases, Analía has served as an arbitrator in a commercial arbitration under the auspices of the International Court of Arbitration of the ICC.

Following on from the Sanum [3] and Philip Morris [4] cases and together with the launch of the SIAC Investment Arbitration Rules and the recent establishment of regional offices for both the PCA and ICC in Singapore, it suggests that investment arbitration is on the rise.

Analía González is part of the international arbitration and litigation practice group, representing clients before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), and the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ), and in ad hoc arbitrations under the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), in cases concerning the environment, the natural resources, public health, among others.

Sherina Petit Qualified: 2002 Made partner: 2012 Key cases: Representing the energy subsidiary of one of India's leading technology companies in an ICC arbitration worth $ 450m; acting for one of India's leading wind energy companies in an ICC arbitration; acting for an Indian pharma company in an LCIA arbitration.

We have served as arbitrators or counsel in over 500 cases under the rules of all major arbitral institutions, such as the ICC, LCIA, AAA / ICDR, SCC, CAM, CRCICA, NAI, DIAC, SIAC, Swiss Chambers and ICSID, as well as in UNCITRAL and ad hoc arbitrations.

Steven Berry specialises in advocacy in substantial commercial cases in the English courts and domestic and international arbitral tribunals, including ICC, LCIA, LMAA and SIAC, especially in the related fields of insurance and reinsurance, shipping, international banking, commodities and arbitration.

As Arbitrator, he sat in over 80 major international cases, including appointments as President and Co-Arbitrator in numerous ICSID, NAFTA and ad hoc investor - State disputes and institutional and ad hoc commercial arbitration cases worldwide (including ICC; LCIA; Stockholm Chamber of Commerce; Netherlands Arbitration Institute; International Arbitral Centre of the Austrian Federal Economic Chamber; ARIAS; CCIG (Swiss Rules); UNCITRAL).

Diego Cadena is an Ecuadorian lawyer with the international arbitration and litigation group in Washington, D.C.. His practice focuses on comparative law and international dispute resolution, especially in cases involving the representation of clients before the International Court of Justice in The Hague (ICJ), the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) among other international tribunals.

Brokered numerous funding and insurance arrangements for cases brought by SMEs and international claimants pursuing arbitration and international arbitration claims under the auspices of, amongst others, the ICC, ICSID and LCIA.

He has conducted litigation cases before all divisions of the High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Privy Council, and has represented clients involved in arbitrations under the rules of the ICC, LCIA, LMAA, and UNCITRAL.

Once operational, the ADGM Arbitration Centre will be able to register and administer arbitration cases under the ICC Rules.

Under this procedure, the ICC Secretariat would serve as the custodian of a Sealed Offer which had been rejected and would not disclose it to an arbitral tribunal until after the merits and the quantum of the case had been decided and the tribunal was ready to determine who should bear the costs of the arbitration or in what proportion they should be borne by the parties.

Harbour has funded international arbitration cases governed by a wide range of different rules, from ICSID (otherwise known as Bi-lateral Investment Treaty — or BIT — cases) through to ICC and LCIA cases.

Accordingly, although, as in the case of litigation in England, recoverable costs in ICC arbitration can be very significant, as they include the costs incurred by parties in presenting their cases such as legal fees and expenses (whereas legal fees and expenses are not normally recoverable in litigation in e.g. France, Japan or the United States), the Sealed Offer has been little used in ICC arbitration until now.

These cases have been conducted under the major arbitration rules (ICSID, ICC, LCIA, SCC, SCAI, UNCITRAL) in the world's leading arbitration centres (London, Paris, Geneva, Zurich, Stockholm, The Hague, Washington, and Singapore).

In an ICC arbitration these costs would include not just R's share of the arbitrator (s) fees and expenses and the administrative expenses of the ICC but also the costs incurred by R in presenting its case, such as lawyers» fees and expenses, which typically constitute by far the largest amount of arbitration costs.

a major Russian microelectronics company in the ICC arbitration in Frankfurt against a German company in a case concerning design, procurement and implementation of a mobile communication centre prototype.

Victory in complex oil refinery and pipelines dispute In one of the longest running and most technically complex cases to be referred to the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), we obtained a major victory for our client, an Asian contractor, in a US$ 1.4 billion Spanish - language arbitration relating to the construction of an oil refinery and pipelines in Latin America.

We have won many significant cases in U.S. courts, as well as before all major international arbitration forums including the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the American Arbitration Association (AAA), and the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID).

Therefore, in an appropriate case, arbitrations being conducted under the arbitration rules of, say, the SIAC and the ICC could be consolidated.

Our New York partners bring you a depth of experience in representing US - based and international clients in international commercial arbitration cases administered under ICDR, UNCITRAL and ICC arbitration rules, as well as ad hoc arbitrations and arbitrator service in complex international commercial cases.

Mr. Pitts has significant experience advising on cases under the ICC, GCC Commercial Center, Civil Procedures Rules of English Court, LCIA and DCIA arbitrations proceedings under the 1996 Arbitration Act and Oman Arbitration Act.

This can be seen in the rising number of referred cases to both the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), which remains the most popular forum for major Africa - related international arbitrations, and the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), which continues to gain traction, particularly in Anglophone Africa (see tables).