Our New York partners bring you a depth of experience in representing US - based and international clients in international commercial arbitration cases administered under ICDR, UNCITRAL and
ICC arbitration rules, as well as ad hoc arbitrations and arbitrator service in complex international commercial cases.
Acting for a multi-national joint venture in disputes relating to the conversion of passenger aircraft to freighters incorporating
the ICC arbitration rules.
Advising Canadian mining interests in respect of the arbitration of infrastructure construction claims subject to
ICC arbitration rules (seat Canada).
Not exact matches
Pursuant to Article 4 (2) of the
ICC Rules of
Arbitration in force as from 1 March 2017 («
Rules»), this
arbitration commenced on that date.»
The defendant then applied to strike out the originating summons on the ground that any and all rights of appeal under section 49 of the
Arbitration Act had been waived and were thereby excluded when parties agreed to submit their disputes to
arbitration under the
ICC Rules.
As Director of
Arbitration and ADR, North America, for the
ICC International Court of
Arbitration, she advised North American companies, law firms and parties on all phases of
ICC arbitration, including negotiating and drafting
arbitration clauses, substantive and procedural
rules for filing requests for
arbitration before the
ICC Court, and enforcement of
arbitration awards
The transaction document typically makes reference to the institutional
rules as a whole, and the issue of whether and how Article 35 (6) of the ICC Rules or Rule 32.11 of the SIAC Rules operate to exclude a right to appeal may come to light only when there is a dispute that has gone to arbitration, and when the dissatisfied party seeks recourse against the a
rules as a whole, and the issue of whether and how Article 35 (6) of the
ICC Rules or Rule 32.11 of the SIAC Rules operate to exclude a right to appeal may come to light only when there is a dispute that has gone to arbitration, and when the dissatisfied party seeks recourse against the a
Rules or
Rule 32.11 of the SIAC
Rules operate to exclude a right to appeal may come to light only when there is a dispute that has gone to arbitration, and when the dissatisfied party seeks recourse against the a
Rules operate to exclude a right to appeal may come to light only when there is a dispute that has gone to
arbitration, and when the dissatisfied party seeks recourse against the award.
Aleksandra Zanowska participates in
arbitration proceedings under the
Arbitration Rules of the
Arbitration Court at the Polish Chamber of Commerce as well as under the
ICC Rules of
Arbitration.
The
arbitration clause provided that the local arbitral tribunal issuing the award only had jurisdiction over «non-technical» disputes, and any «technical» disputes were to be resolved by an international arbitral tribunal under the
ICC Arbitration Rules.813
Once the institution was founded, the founders realized they needed a mechanism to resolve disputes, which lead to the founding of the
ICC Court of
Arbitration in 1923, although with
rules of
arbitration and conciliation.
Siddharth has substantial experience of acting under a wide variety of arbitral
rules, including in
ICC, LCIA, AAA, LMAA, UNCITRAL and FOSFA
arbitrations.
By adopting and agreeing to submit disputes to
arbitration under the
ICC Rules or the SIAC
Rules, parties hence agree to exclude their right to appeal on questions of law in domestic
arbitrations.
He has represented clients in both institutional and ad hoc
arbitrations under a wide variety of arbitral
rules, including LCIA,
ICC, ICDR, UNCITRAL and ICSID.
At the 300 - lawyer firm, he will advise and represent clients in
arbitration and conciliation proceedings under the
rules of the Washington, DC - headquartered ICSID, the
ICC, UNCITRAL, LCIA, the Belgian Centre for Mediation and
Arbitration, and ad - hoc
arbitrations.
Edwin Coe's
arbitration team has experience on a broad range of matters and in many
arbitration centres, particularly under the
rules of the LCIA,
ICC and Stockholm Chamber of Commerce.
Jason Fry, secretary general of the
ICC International Court of
Arbitration, was in Toronto yesterday to provide the legal community with an overview of the changes to the
rules of
ICC arbitration, which come into force Jan. 1, 2012, and outline the reasons for some of the changes.
He has represented parties in disputes before United States courts and before international
arbitration panels (under
ICC, AAA / ICDR, UNCITRAL and ICSID
rules) in a wide range of disputes, including matters in several countries in Latin America and Spain.
Following on from the Sanum [3] and Philip Morris [4] cases and together with the launch of the SIAC Investment
Arbitration Rules and the recent establishment of regional offices for both the PCA and
ICC in Singapore, it suggests that investment
arbitration is on the rise.
Anna has advised clients from various industries and jurisdictions in international
arbitration proceedings under the LCIA,
ICC, DIFC - LCIA, DIAC, JCAA and TOMAC
rules, as well as ad hoc proceedings in England and Nigeria.
Chairman or member of Arbitral Tribunals in more than 150 commercial or investment
arbitrations carried out under the
rules of the
ICC, ICSID, UNCITRAL, SCC, LCIA, AAA, Vienna Arbitral Chamber, Milan Arbitral Chamber and the Cairo Regional Centre for International Commercial Arbitration.
He has experience of a wide range of arbitral proceedings under various institutional
rules (including LCIA,
ICC and UNCITRAL) and is equally comfortable working with and without leaders, and as co-counsel with firms of
arbitration practitioners.
She has acted as counsel in multiple international
arbitrations under the
ICC, UNCITRAL and SCC
rules, and has particular experience in the pharma, chemical, med - tech, industrial engineering and finance sectors.
He regularly represents his clients as Counsel in
arbitrations governed by various institutional
rules including DIAC, DIFC - LCIA,
ICC, and LMAA.
She has acted or advised in a range of international
arbitrations, under institutional
rules (ICSID,
ICC, LCIA and UNCITRAL) both under English and foreign law.
Advising the Republic of Albania in international
arbitration under the
ICC Rules (seat Paris) concerning claims arising from energy concession contracts and infrastructure projects involving hydroelectric development.
He serves as counsel and sits as an arbitrator in international
arbitration proceedings under
rules of the major
arbitration institutions, including the
ICC, LCIA, UNCITRAL, ICSID and the
arbitration rules of various trade associations.
We have served as arbitrators or counsel in over 500 cases under the
rules of all major arbitral institutions, such as the
ICC, LCIA, AAA / ICDR, SCC, CAM, CRCICA, NAI, DIAC, SIAC, Swiss Chambers and ICSID, as well as in UNCITRAL and ad hoc
arbitrations.
He has conducted numerous
arbitrations both ad hoc and in accordance with institutional
rules (including UNCITRAL, ICSID,
ICC, LCIA and ARIAS).
She has represented clients in
arbitrations under the LCIA,
ICC, DIAC, SCC and UNCITRAL
Rules.
Advising Ukranian state interests in international
arbitration under
ICC Rules (Swiss seat) against contracting parties in respect of energy sale and purchase contracts.
Mr. Huber has represented clients in international
arbitrations sited in both common and civil law jurisdictions under a wide variety of arbitral
rules, including the LCIA,
ICC, VIAC and AAA.
The disputes are often considered under a foreign applicable law and resolved under the
arbitration rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (
ICC), the International Centre for Dispute Resolution of the American
Arbitration Association (ICDR), the London Court of International
Arbitration (LCIA), The World Bank's International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), or the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL).
Mr. Born has represented European, US, Asian and other companies in
arbitrations under all leading institutional
rules (
ICC, LCIA, AAA, Vienna, Stockholm, ICSID) and in ad hoc
arbitrations in all leading international seats (London, Paris, Geneva / Zurich, Vienna, Stockholm, New York, Washington, Singapore).
He has significant experience in court litigation as well as domestic and international
arbitration under various sets of
rules, such as
ICC, UNCITRAL, SCC and NAI.
Appointed as co-Arbitrator, sole arbitrator and chair in
arbitration proceedings under the LCIA,
ICC and UNCITRAL
arbitration rules.
David has acted as counsel in both domestic and international
arbitration, including AAA
arbitration, ICDR International
Rules,
ICC arbitration, LMAA
arbitration, GAFTA
arbitration, and various other ad hoc and non-institutional
arbitrations.
As Arbitrator, he sat in over 80 major international cases, including appointments as President and Co-Arbitrator in numerous ICSID, NAFTA and ad hoc investor - State disputes and institutional and ad hoc commercial
arbitration cases worldwide (including
ICC; LCIA; Stockholm Chamber of Commerce; Netherlands
Arbitration Institute; International Arbitral Centre of the Austrian Federal Economic Chamber; ARIAS; CCIG (Swiss
Rules); UNCITRAL).
Her experience includes working on complex international commercial
arbitration disputes under the
ICC, LCIA, DIS, UNCITRAL, PCA and the
Arbitration Institute of the Finland Chamber of Commerce
Rules.
Last year, the English Court of Appeal's decision in Jivraj v Hashwani sparked widespread concern among many in the
arbitration community that «nationality» provisions in
arbitration clauses (including those in the
ICC and LCIA
Rules, incorporated by reference into countless contracts) might be void under English law, in relation to appointments made in the UK.
She is highly familiar with the major
rules of
arbitration, including those established by the International Chamber of Commerce (
ICC), the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), the Singapore International
Arbitration Center (SIAC), and the
rules of procedure in the Singapore courts.
Ms. Narancio's international
arbitration practice includes representation in both institutional and ad hoc
arbitrations (including under the
ICC, LCIA, SIAC, NAI and UNCITRAL
rules) sited in both common and civil law jurisdictions, and has particular experience with issues relating to Latin American jurisdictions.
We have extensive experience in complex cross-jurisdictional disputes and our lawyers have represented clients in
arbitrations under all the major international
rules (
ICC, LMAA, LCIA, UNCITRAL, SIAC, CIETAC and HIAC), as well as before commodity trade tribunals (including LME, GAFTA and FOSFA).
An
arbitration, sited in Stockholm, under
ICC Rules, between an international energy company and a Central Asian state.
Our lawyers are presently handling disputes under the International Chamber of Commerce (
ICC), American
Arbitration Association (AAA), London Court of International
Arbitration (LCIA), International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), Vienna International Arbitral Center (VIAC) and UNCITRAL
rules; we also have extensive experience with other forms of institutional
arbitration and ad hoc
arbitrations, including
arbitration of public international law issues.
An
arbitration under
ICC rules between a US high technology company and a Scandinavian manufacturer over misappropriation of trade secrets.
Our lawyers are presently handling disputes under the International Chamber of Commerce (
ICC), American
Arbitration Association (AAA), London Court of International
Arbitration (LCIA), International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), Vienna International Arbitral Center (VIAC) and UNCITRAL
rules; we also have extensive experience with other forms of institutional
arbitration and ad hoc
arbitrations.
His international
arbitration practice spans states and state entities predominantly operating under the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes and the
ICC International Court of
Arbitration rules.
Commercial
Arbitration and Investor - State
Arbitration under the
rules of one of the major international
arbitration institutions, such as the
ICC, LCIA or ICSID and subject to a wide range of laws can be financed in a variety of venues, against respondents whose assets appear to be available to satisfy any award.
Their
arbitration experience includes arbitral disputes under the following institutions and
rules: ICSID (World Bank),
ICC, LCIA, ICDR, DIS and the Hong Kong International
Arbitration Centre.
She has acted as counsel in institutional as well as ad hoc
arbitrations including proceedings under the
ICC, UNCITRAL, DIS and Vienna
Rules.