Sentences with phrase «ideas of the evolution of»

If the late Pontiff favoured the idea of an evolution of species, it was according to a notion far more limited than the one held by secular scientists.
But, in fact, he was struggling valiantly with the idea of the evolution of the subjective both in this book and in The Biological Basis of Human Freedom (BBHF).
In addition to student achievement outcomes the study revealed differential patterns in favor of Science IDEAS of the evolution of teacher judgments of student reading proficiency across grades 3 - 7.

Not exact matches

So I think the most interesting evolutions of it have been just trying to stretch the idea into new places.
The evolution of ideas doesn't happen linearly, with one good idea contributing to a better idea contributing to the best idea.
Since 1979, I would suggest, there have been five key evolutions that have helped bring to life the idea of entrepreneurship as a systematic, replicable process.
When Vancouver businessman John Bruk approached him with the innovative proposal of creating a Foundation to help Canadians better understand Asia's evolution, Trudeau leapt at the idea.
The early users were highly proficient at games and provided many ideas for the game's evolution («mods»), posting changes to the game on line, which encouraged others and started an upward spiral of sales, modifications and debugs.
HealthXL Global Gatherings showcase innovation on a global platform by bringing together people with ideas, resources and desire to contribute to the evolution of healthcare.
Price spoke about the evolution of Austin's technology industry with Silicon Hills News for its Ideas -LSB-...]
Calling the theory of evolution «only a theory» is, strictly speaking, true, but the idea it tries to convey is completely wrong.
I think those who oppose the theory of evolution, oppose evolution in alll forms — they fear change and want to remain with ideas of the past.
One thing that many Christians get hung up on is the idea of evolution as a belief that we all developed from single celled organisms and that our genetic map split from apes and etc..
The concept of God did not spring out of thin air - intelligent humans created him and then thousands of years later used the idea to explain what they did not understand and / or like about evolution.
Central to this Court - led revolution is the idea that the Constitution is in a state of more or less perpetual evolution, whence it follows that judges need not be bound by the precise words of the document, or by prior precedent, or by settled historical meaning.
The older textbooks on evolution make much of the idea of ho - m - ology, pointing out the obvious resemblances between the skeletons of the limbs of different animals.
Catholic theology has never really had a quarrel with the idea that the present species of plants and animals are the result of a long process of evolution» or with the idea that this process has unfolded according to natural laws.
The body and soul of Darwin's Theory of Evolution was the idea that evolution was made possible through natural sEvolution was the idea that evolution was made possible through natural sevolution was made possible through natural selection.
Since no one has yet to SEE an atom, the idea of the structure of the atom can only be inferred by experimental evidence — yet I see no Republican trying to stop teaching the structure of the atom in school — oh that's right, its because major corporations and industries rely on this science (pharm, weapons manufacturers etc etc) whereas the theory of evolution is merely think piece of scientists on how life on Earth changes over time.
With all the emphasis on creation or evolution coming out of the first few chapters of Genesis, we often miss some of the most important ideas about our humanity and how God created us (not physically, but spiritually and psychologically).
The idea of spinning out nature comes from the Sankhya concept of the evolution of the world out of nature (prakriti).
His interests are the metaphysics of time, the history of ideas, and the conceptual foundations of biological evolution.
By the way, Vic, if you really want to do this without sounding silly focus on the idea of sentience, which arguably is NOT necessary for evolution, but only the existence of something that mimics sentience.
In the final section of Part One of Catholicism, Fr Holloway writes that Evolution is the «The universal idea which is critical for Christian thinking today».
to Jake, in every era or times in the past, humans have different perception of reality, because our knowledge improves or changes toward sophistication, For example during the times of Jesus, there was no science yet as what we have today, since the religion in the past corresponds to their needs, it is true for them in the past, but today we already knew many new ideas and facts, so what is applicable in the past is no longer today, like religion, we have also to change to conform with todays knowledge.The creation or our origin for example is now explained beyond doubt by science as the big bang and evolution is the reason we become humans, is in contrast to creation in the bibles genesis,.
There is no scientific evidence that man evolved from animals, and all the evidence we have shows that the idea of evolution is not true.
Instead of affirming the idea of evolution as supporting atheism or rejecting it because it did so, some Christians took the position that its acceptance changes the way we understand God's work in the world.
Stephen Barr criticizes me for confusing two very different things: the modest scientific theory of neo-Darwinism (which he defines as «the idea that the mainspring of evolution is natural selection acting on random genetic variation») and what he calls the «theological» claim that evolution is an «unguided, unplanned» process.
The culture concept is one of the great illuminating ideas of modern science, comparable in importance to the concept of evolution in biology, the concept of electromagnetic and gravitational fields in physics, and the concept of the atom in chemistry.
Holding to evolution as the origin of the world and all that is therein makes good philosophical sense if and only if you reject the idea of a God... or even of gods.
Much opposition to the concept of evolution in the nineteenth century derived from a revulsion against the idea that humans were descended from ape - like animals long ago.
I also believe that the idea of evolution or development is an essential key to a nonscholastic doctrine of analogy, if only because it is the modern understanding of organic and historical evolution that brought to an end the scholastic idea of Being (as is so brilliantly demonstrated by Arthur O. Lovejoy in The Great Chain of Being).
Conclusion German philosophy and the idea of evolution have so combined since Darwin, — for all philosophy is an appreciation and interpretation of reality — that it is not now possible to unravel the tangled threads of fact and theory, physics and metaphysics.
This is a problem which has driven scholastic theology to the wall, and it is not insignificant that Catholic theologians have been hostile toward the idea of evolution, just as it is not accidental that when a Catholic vision of evolution did appear in the work of Teilhard de Chardin, it contained no idea or vision of analogia entis.
EDITORIAL COMMENT: Mr McEwan would seem to be right (i) in his depiction of Professor Ayala's somewhat deistic leanings concerning the role of the creator (see our Cutting Edge column July 2010), (ii) that we, with Ayala, affirm that physical, chemical and biological evolution is a well attested fact, and (Hi) that the idea that this process is a chance one does not work.
A crucial chapter of the book analyses the reception of Darwin's 19th century ideas on biological evolution.
It suggests that Professor Ayala accepts the idea of evolution by natural chance.
His idea is essentially «theistic evolution» — belief that God has established evolution as the mechanism by which He has introduced complexity and diversity into the biological sphere of life on earth.
An authentic reading of Genesis even lends some support to the idea of evolution.
If you still aren't sure what to make of evolution or if you have always been suspicious of it, I hope these ideas will inspire you to at least give the theory second chance.
He was the first outstanding American minister to be receptive to the idea of evolution.
The ideas of evolution and historical development in the distant past were barely accepted, before the current process of cultural and religious change gained momentum.
Darwin was led to the idea of evolution by patterns he noticed in the distribution of species.
On one hand you talk about an idea «evolution,» and on the other hand you are talking about matter «clump of cells.»
It describes the evolution of his scientific ideas but also of his conception of the relationship between science and faith.
In a clever (but in no way cloying) play on the idea of evolution, so central to her hometown's identity, Evans explains that faith has its own evolutionary process, that «faith must adapt in order to survive.»»
When, for example, at first in the 19th century down to Pius XII the Church adopted a very reserved attitude to any inclusion of the human bios in the idea of evolution, that was motivated, and rightly so, by a fundamental conception of the nature of man which for good reasons required to be defended.
According to many biologists today this chemical explanation of life and evolution has no need to resort to the idea of purpose or to what Aristotle termed final cause.
Evolution doesn't propose any explanation for the existence of matter itself, nor does it propose the idea that life came from non-life.
What less conservative Christians are not committed to is the idea that intelligent design excludes the possibility of evolution.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z