Sentences with phrase «idthe generalizability of our results»

This may affect the generalizability of our results, but we would not expect comparisons of rice intake and urinary As to have been biased.
The authors acknowledge a reduced generalizability of their results because procedures and risk factors change over time, which is a problem of all long - term follow - up studies.
Therefore, I would be somewhat skeptical about the generalizability of these results.
The authors of the study concluded that dogs on a raw food diet may be a source of environmental contamination, although they caution about the generalizability of their results due to the small number of dogs studied.
[The authors justify their choice of 1970 because of the pooorer data quality before that date, which is fine, but they do not fully recognize the possible implications of that choice for the generalizability of their results.]
For some of my other claims, such as starting in 1970, I am not claiming error, simply pointing out limitations on the generalizability of the results.
The generalizability of our results is limited by the fact that many parents did not choose or were unable to participate in the parent - training intervention as offered.
Lastly, we must consider the heterogeneity of the indicator of the risk factor as it pertains to generalizability of the results.
Accordingly, the generalizability of our results to other populations and treatment in nonspecialist settings is limited.
Nevertheless, the generalizability of the results might not be a serious concern because of the high consent rate for enrollment (> 80 %) and the low attrition rate 24 months after childbirth in the HBC Study (< 10 %)(Takagai et al., in press).
The inclusion of younger women who live in other districts would be necessary to ensure greater generalizability of the results.
Relatedly, we had a response rate of 58 %, which may also influence generalizability of these results, even though we were able to show no respondent bias based on age and sex.
Limitations include the lack of a control group at the post-intervention follow - up and concerns about generalizability of the results, due to the largely white, middle - class, and educated sample.
Limitations include reliance on self - report measures and generalizability of the results to female children.
Limitations include small sample size, generalizability of the results due to ethnicity and gender of participants, and lack of follow - up.
Limitations include the lack of randomization, small rural and suburban sample, and lack of diversity in the sample challenges the generalizability of the results to urban child welfare organizations.
This limits the generalizability of the results to children with low socio - economic background.
Limitations include generalizability of the results due to not using a more culturally and socio - economically diverse population and reliability on self - reported measures.
Therefore, the generalizability of our results is limited as marriage market conditions, likelihood of transitioning into widowhood, and the health consequences of widowhood are known to differ by race, ethnicity, nativity status, and levels of education (Elwert & Christakis, 2006; Kearl & Murgia, 1985; Lichter, LeClere, & McLaughlin, 1991).
This type of recruitment procedure, while able to increase the sample's diversity in some important ways (specifically, there were more males and more same sex relationships reported on in this study than in many relationship surveys), also limits the overall generalizability of our results and only paints a one - sided picture of a phenomenon that is inherently dyadic.
In addition, we used a sample of white, middle - class couples, which could limit the generalizability of the results.
As is common with randomized controlled trials, the homogenous nature of the sample (e.g., age, ethnicity, income) limits the generalizability of the results.

Not exact matches

The researchers noted that the cohort of 2,827 participants whose data were analyzed in this study were generally healthy, mostly Caucasian (92.2 %), elderly males (average age 76.4 years), therefore limiting the generalizability of the study results to other populations.
Study limitations include potential misclassification, not examining the specific features of psychopathology, and having results based on patients at two academic centers so questions of generalizability arise.
Limitations of the study include that the prevalence of ADHD in the study group was somewhat higher than U.S. estimates and the results may have limited generalizability because New Jersey has an older licensing age at 17 and it is highly urbanized.
Furthermore, the process should be recognized not only as technical, but the result of micro and macro social, political and economic contexts, which should be acknowledged and documented in order to infer generalizability.
[9] While some have questioned the generalizability of the ECLS - K results due to sampling, [10] the qualitative result has been replicated using the National Assessment of Educational Progress (the 2017 Morgan et al. study), the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002, [11] and the ECLS - Birth Cohort.
The generalizability of EFT across different kinds of clients and couples facing co-morbidities such as depression and PTSD has been examined and results are consistently positive.
Limitations include small sample size, issues with the randomization of participants that resulted in differences between the groups at baseline, reliance on self - reported measures as reduction in symptoms were significant for adolescent reports but not for parent report, and generalizability due to the primarily female participant gender.
Limitations include the lack of randomized control group and the resulting inability to definitively make causal attributions to Nurturing Parenting Program participation because of other unmeasured factors that could be associated with program attendance and concerns about generalizability to other states or the national population.
Future studies need to consider parents of younger child in order to improve the generalizability of current results.
Based on these mixed results and limitations in generalizability, more studies are needed with (a) adequate controls for key socioeconomic and family composition factors known to be associated with behavior problems in children, (b) early assessment of temperament, (c) samples that include higher risk children (e.g., low - income families, children with health problems, etc.), and (d) controls for behavior problems that predate the exposure to recent family conflict.
The present results have four important implications for the generalizability of most previously - reported cG × E findings.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z