Sentences with phrase «imo because»

The Pro Controller was necessary IMO because we finally have a true, non-gimmick controller for any Wii U game.

A game like Uncharted Golden Abyss was worth the money IMO because it was a game that I will probably never see replicated in the smartphone space, but NOVA 3 (again, a seven dollar game) has more content and does it even better than Resistance Burning Skies.

Regardless, I do see it as lower sales than expected imo because of the fact that everybody has it already on 3ds and the switch install base is low.

They are very smart and training is a must imo because they love the work and they also become the most well behaved dogs.

I find it much better than GTA IMO because of how much more in depth the whole cop thing is.

Cougars are just absolutely superior IMO because, man, there so many benefits to dating a mature, lovely older woman.

RO doesn't really date IMO because his styles year to year are consistent.

Our transfer policy needs looking into IMO because something is not right when you buy someone, knowing he has no chance at all of playing first team football for your club, then loan him out for six years, sell him to the club you got him from, buy him back to sell him but can't so sell him back to the original club again.

IMO because Wenger was successful in turning Petite from a CB to midfield, and Henry from Winger to lethal striker he has believed that he can repeat the feat.

Not always because we don't have the resources but often IMO because he finds it hard to spend money in this ever inflating players market.

Not sure about his performances this season and did not watch him this season to comment on him to be honest but would be a good signing imo because he is a tall strong physical and natural holding midfielding player but first priority should be to get either schneiderlin or kondogbia if they are not gettable then sign carvalho to be a backup to coquelin or play both of them in tough away games next season in champions league and premier league chelsea at stamford bridge, old traffold, etihad etc..

Anyway this deal would be great imo because it get's rid of Walcott (who isn't currently and shouldn't be a starter) and brings in a very good player; win win.

We looked limp IMO because 30 % of the players we played don't want to wear the Arsenal shirt.

I don't think iwobi can play in that position IMO because he doesn't defend very well and he will be a liability for us at the middle of the park.

He would also fail miserably IMO because he only knows one style of play and would not get enough time with the England team to install that playing style.

Wynn is better than Hernandez imo because hes more consistent and will give up less bad plays then Hernenadez while Hernendez will make more wow plays due to his «mean streak» but give up a few more bad ones than Wynn.

That would dictate caution imo because a draw is still a good result.

Not exact matches

IMO the believer will never lose their belief because the very life of God indwells them.

But that's because He's used the same Scripture to speak different things to different people, which imo shouldn't really surprise us.

I think that evolution is correct, because science brings the best case, imo.

but the Gods [because there are multiple Gods in this book — all aspects of One, really, but that's IMO, not explicitly stated and may come from my own inherent religious bias] have US — they can work through US — they have a doorway into our world.

@Sabio: IMO, the god that Steve believes in — which is also the one (s) mainstream Christianity believe in — is no different from the thief that Jesus described in the first part of John 10:10, because they believe in one who will destroy the vast majority of humanity («The thief comes to steal, kill, and destroy....»).

The difference IMO is that in corporate America I can be like «oh, my boss is an asshole and I have to pretend to kiss his ass because it's all a game and this is how it's played.»

because, IMO, all the «joy» and «inner strength» believers say they have ultimately originates from their own minds.

IMO it's completely illogical to look at something and simply arrive at «a higher power must have done that because we can't understand it».

they were great and I just wanted to leave that note because if you need to watch your sugar think about it and try one without honey or syrup and you'll see it actually needs no sweetener or anything... imo it doesn't even need spices but thats just me happy eating guys

It needs less sugar than the 2 cups because it is sweeter than reg sugar (imo the brownies came out a bit too sweet for me to finish the brownie with 2 cups of morenita).

Wenger signing Kante imo would have been a waste for Kante and Arsenal because he would be regularly subbed off when Arsenal are chasing a game and only considered a starter in games we might have to defend more in.

I have said a few times that MN has potential and I want to see more of him, not only because he has impressed me when played with the 1st team (ok not great but still very good profress IMO) but because he can play RM as well.

I'd prefer option 2 because imo this QB group is a crapshoot whereas Barkley is as close to can't miss as it gets.

The ties over, so I would try to win the game but the players are only playing for the shirt imo, it's not impossible, but highly improbable they have a mean defense, let's cement 3rd and retain the fa cup (relatively poor) I know because of the expectation and all the noise the club was making last summer but its a slight improvement.

But I do know that to think the outcome would have been different or will be different next season because we buy one or two players is naive IMO.

If provided chance at RW, he can provide us help with his attacking instincts which he is restricting atm because of RB role IMO.

I will say he does hit the floor too often but imo it's because he is taking it hard and looking for contact... Which imo will translate into more points and a better rating once he establishes himself as a full time player.

Ospina hasn't put a foot wrong, he brings confidence to the defense because his reliable, that's a top keeper imo every arsenal fan can testify that we not worried when the ball is near Ospina.

that being said, this upcoming year, IMO, is for the kids to show & prove, excluding Ingram because everyone else would have been here for a couple years already.

IMO he gave away the talent and because he did not get enough in return, he was unable to replace it.

Moreover Vea makes a LB less of of need, imo, because of his ability in the run game.

It's a bit much to label him not good enough because he has shown the ability to be a quality player imo, but I think he needs a bit more regular playing time and a more defined role.

Because he rates Ozil higher IMO.

IMO we should have taken a gamble on that Ben Yedder kid but it's too late now as he has signed for Sevilla, so we need to get Mustafi or Koulibaby or Manolas plus Mahrez and Lacazette that's if we are serious about challenging for both the UCL and the League because Lacazette alone will not be enough for us we need goals from all our front 3's.

We need him to repeat last season's level because IMO Arteta and Flamini are not serious backup options if we want to win anything.

United bound for sure IMO, Simply because of Van Gaal.

Van Gaal's failure at Man U is IMO just because he is not as exceptional as everyone liked to think and he had a squad that was lacking a bit.

He will have moments of brilliance because he is such a fantastic athlete (when fit) but he has always failed to consistently produce and IMO always will at such high levels.

Great players do it consistently at a high level at all levels because of their drive and armoury IMO.

Spezza is no longer a superstar, but writing him off because he's not overly physical is a mistake imo

It makes sense the Niners are examining so thoroughly, because he's the epitome of an enigmatic player IMO.

Hazard is good but he doesn't deserve Player of the Year imo, the main reason Chelsea are on top is because of Fabregas and Costa.

But IMO it depends mostly on the ranking discrepancy, I have a hard time believing they'd do that if said LB was ranked significantly lower than the other guys they have up — I don't think they'd take a player who they evaluate significantly lower than other remaining guys just because he's a LB and they need one, especially with a pick as valuable as a 2nd rounder.