Sentences with phrase «ipcc author teams»

Obviously, not every scientist will always agree with assessments made by the IPCC author teams.

IPCC author teams include a mix of authors from different regions.

Not exact matches

He has served on the National Research Council and the National Science Foundation and was a lead author on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) team.

A Fellow of the American Geophysical Union, Schimel served as a 1994 - 95 Convening Lead Author for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Report and he was on the team that received the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for the IPCC Report.

Debra Roberts, Working Group II Co-Chair added: «As an IPCC Special Report focused on two Earth systems which together cover the majority of the planet's surface and which affect the majority of the global population, a diverse and skilled author team is critical in ensuring a report of the highest policy relevance.»

There should be no campaigners or anyone else with a vested interest on the «lead author» team for any IPCC publication — ever.»

As for lead authors reviewing / citing their own work... the IPCC's got it covered in their package of «reforms» in response to the InterAcademy Council review: The task group on Conflict of Interest took a leaf from the Muir Russell report and tapped into the «team - work» side - step.

J. Curry: «Clouds are the source of massive discomfort... this issue will have its own chapter in the IPCC AR5 report (with a good team of lead authors), so hopefully we will get illumination on the subject, if not a «fix»»

But it is surprising that neither the IPCC writing team nor the paper author realised that the Gregory 02 sensitivity PDF embodied an approximately uniform prior in Y, not in S.

It is our hope that this collection of opinions, informed by a range of perspectives and experiences within and from outside the IPCC, will be of some help as author teams begin their work on the AR5 in earnest.

However, the IPCC's author team did engage in a lively interchanges about the quality and overall consistency of all of the papers as the chapter was drafted and revised in the course of review.

The Bureaus of the three IPCC Working Groups will then select the author teams from the lists of nominations.

In one particularly outrageous and error - filled passage, McKitrick accuses IPCC AR4 co-ordinating lead authors Phil Jones and Kevin Trenberth of selecting their team of contributing authors solely on the basis of whether they agree with the pair's scientific views.

The study's authors, a team made up of David Legates with Dr. Willie Soon, Dr. William M. Briggs, and Christopher Monckton, stated that they agreed with the IPCC's findings of a warming earth.

I would like to emphasize that the whole process of preparation of IPCC Reports is characterized by discussion which takes place within and across author teams and a rigorous process of review which serves the purpose of incorporating diverse points of view at various stages of drafting of the report.»

Dr. Michiel Schaeffer, Director / Senior Scientist Co-founder of Climate Analytics and head of our science team, bio-physicist with a PhD in dynamic meteorology, specialising in the interactions between atmosphere, ocean, eco-systems and society, author of the IPCC AR5 and the World Bank Turn Down the Heat reports.

Climate Analytics: a multidisciplinary and culturally diverse team composed of experts in climate science and impacts, including authors of the IPCC, experts in climate finance, adaptation, climate negotiation, mitigation policies and climate policy analysis.

He has been a Coordinating Lead Author of the scientific assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and was most recently a member of the team leading the 2014 U.S. National Climate Assessment.

However, what is at stake is the work process of the IPCC, in particular how the author teams finalize their reports and the Summary for Policymakers, a rather political haggling.

Lets see what Michael Mann, lead Author for IPCC, member of the Team, author of many paleoclimate articles,Author for IPCC, member of the Team, author of many paleoclimate articles,author of many paleoclimate articles, says:

In fact, the WGI report is built upon a process which, as revealed by the Climategate emails, is, by its very nature, designed not to produce an accurate view of the state of climate science, but instead to be an «assessment» of the state of climate science — an assessment largely driven by preconceived ideas of the IPCC design team and promulgated by various elite chapter authors.

Those involved in selecting authors will need to strive for an author team composition that reflects a balance of expertise and perspectives, such that IPCC products are comprehensive, objective, and neutral with respect to policy.

Jones and the Team have used their offices as reviewers to quash criticism from appearing in print e.g. «going to town» as a reviewer on papers that had the temerity to criticize and, as IPCC review authors, to initial suppress and then include only with adverse editorial comment criticisms like McKitrick and Michaels 2004.

The role of Review Editors in the IPCC assessment process is to assist the Working Group / Task Force Bureaux in identifying reviewers for the expert review process, ensure that all substantive expert and government review comments are afforded appropriate consideration by the author teams, advise Lead Authors on how to handle contentious / controversial issues and ensure genuine controversies are reflected adequately in the text of the report.

He takes the position that the IPCC has procedures on author selection, author - team balance and newly reinvigorated procedures on conflict of interest which, if properly and transparently enforced, don't need further tightening.

He's never been an IPCC author before either, so his inclusion in the author team would have been just as innovative.

The procedures address all steps leading to the preparation of IPCC material starting with the scoping process, nomination process and selection of authors, preparation of drafts by the writing teams, the review by experts and governments and finally the approval, adoption and acceptance process in plenary sessions.