Sentences with phrase «ipcc authors note»
But evidence to support the scientists» concerns about Earth's climate is growing — and getting stronger — every year, the IPCC authors note.
https://www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/ Not exact matches
As it is explained in the «Notes for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report on Addressing Uncertainties»: Likelihood may be based on quantitative analysis or an elicitation of expert views.
Side note: the CEO of Sierra Club Canada sent my report to John M.R. Stone, a key author for the Nobel Prize winning IPCC report to see if I was accurate.
13 of IPCC AR5 WG1, the authors note that the two reasonably well - modeled components of the sea - level budget — thermal expansion and glaciers — add up to about 1.1 mm / y.
The author notes that... «warming oceans account for about 35 — 40 % of that rate of sea level rise over the past two decades, according to the IPCC AR5».
And — while I am at it — Guidance Note for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainty shows how subjectivism has been introduced and endorsed by IPCC.
Issues noted were that some authors didn't follow IPCC guidelines, not that the IPCC guidelines were insufficient.
JC note: Pursuant to Nic's post on «The IPCC's alteration of Forster & Gregory's model - independent climate sensitivity results,» he has sent a letter to Gabi Hegerl, who was coordinating lead author on chapter 9 of the IPCC AR4.
«The language of denial: Text analysis reveals differences in language use between climate change proponents and skeptics» «Comment on «Climate Science and the Uncertainty Monster» by J. A. Curry and P. J. Webster» «Guidance note for lead authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on consistent treatment of uncertainties»
Deadlines for considering research in the IPCC reports — a six - month limit — renders them out of date before they are published, noted David Victor of the University of California, San Diego, and the author of Global Warming Gridlock.
Prof David Stern, energy and environmental economist at the Australian National University and lead author on the Drivers, Trends and Mitigation chapter of the IPCC's working group three report, also chooses the 1976 Keeling paper, though he notes:
Yet, as the author notes, there is evidence that climate scientists in general and the IPCC in particular tend to be conservative in their estimates.
The Guidance Note for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties impose upon the lead authors to assign subjective levels of confidence to their findings: «The AR5 will rely on two metrics for communicating the degree of certainty in key findings: 1 Confidence in the validity of a finding, based on the type, amount, quality, and consistency of evidence (e.g., mechanistic understanding, theory, data, models, expert judgment) and the degree of agrAuthors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties impose upon the lead authors to assign subjective levels of confidence to their findings: «The AR5 will rely on two metrics for communicating the degree of certainty in key findings: 1 Confidence in the validity of a finding, based on the type, amount, quality, and consistency of evidence (e.g., mechanistic understanding, theory, data, models, expert judgment) and the degree of agrauthors to assign subjective levels of confidence to their findings: «The AR5 will rely on two metrics for communicating the degree of certainty in key findings: 1 Confidence in the validity of a finding, based on the type, amount, quality, and consistency of evidence (e.g., mechanistic understanding, theory, data, models, expert judgment) and the degree of agreement.
«In considering any claim to scientific consensus, it seems appropriate to note the following statement by Dr Benjamin Santer, author of the 2007 IPCC report chapter on the detection of greenhouse warming — who is not a sceptic (to my knowledge): «It's unfortunate that many people read the media hype before they read the chapter on the detection of greenhouse warming.
The Hockey Stick advanced by Mann et al. (1998) and revised by the authors in 1999 was, as you note, the featured hallmark of IPCC's TAR.
A set of terms to describe uncertainties in current knowledge is common to all parts of the IPCC Fourth Assessment, based on the Guidance Notes for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report on Addressing Uncertainties1, produced by the IPCC in July 2005.
He noted:» [The IPCC was] meticulous in insisting that the final decision on whether to accept particular review comments should reside with chapter Lead Authors.»
The IPCC responded with «Guidance Note for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties» https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B1gFp6Ioo3akNnNCaVpfR1dKTGM/edit?pli=1
In the Guidance Note for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties on page 3 there is Table 1 titled «Likelihood Scale.»
Note that a new practice at the IPCC is the back - to - back holding of an expert meeting on scenarios with lead author meetings, to ensure coordination with the scientific community which is developing a new generation of socioeconomic scenarios for climate change impacts, adaptation and mitigation research.
Including: Annex 1 - Tasks and Responsibilities for Lead Authors, Coordinating Lead Authors, Contributing Authors, Expert Reviewers and Review Editors of IPCC Reports and Government Focal Points; Annex 2 - Procedure on the Use of Literature in IPCC reports; and Annex 3 - IPCC Protocol for Addressing Possible Errors in IPCC Assessment Reports, Synthesis Reports, Special Reports and Methodology Reports Appendix B... covers «Financial Procedures for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)» (explanatory notes to the Financial Procedures for the IPCC)