The delayed sea level reaction to temperatures doesn't mean tide records necessarily reflect actual thermometer readings before 1990 but it's nevertheless interesting that, due to the low 1992 global temperature indicated in
the IPCC chart above (Mt Pinatubo?)
But note in
the IPCC chart above, CO2 on the long time scale never gets as high as it is today.
In fact, if you look at the marks on
the IPCC chart above for the contribution of Antarctic ice to ocean levels, it has a net negative impact, which means the IPCC actually expects the Antarctic ice sheet to grow, not melt.
Not exact matches
The
above reality
chart of empirical evidence affirms what the
IPCC truly does not want to discuss: the «control - knob» concept is literally a myth.
Also, the
above chart of the 12 - month means clearly shows a climate that moves from cooling to warming phases, and then back - a natural oscillation that «catastrophic global warming» skeptics have long discussed, while being dismissed by the
IPCC and its cohorts.
Prior to speaking to the
above chart, Bob points out a flagrant propaganda ploy used by establishment climate - alarmist scientists, and the
IPCC, which is never challenged by the MSM press (to paraphrase):»
The
above chart (click to enlarge) depicts the robust and significant lowering of the
IPCC's predictions regarding human CO2 - induced global warming.
99.9 %??? The vast majority of scientists look at the
above chart and instantly know that the Antarctica warming scare pushed by Comiso is a fabrication - like much of the
IPCC «science» the public and policymakers are now identifying as a fabrication.
But every pdf in Figure 9.20 goes hard to zero at or (usually) 0.5 - 1C
above zero — this is clearly not just an artifact of the
IPCC having cut its composite
chart off at zero.