Just two weeks ago, a top
IPCC climate modeler dropped a bombshell and told the world that global warming is
Not exact matches
The
IPCC's
climate modelers purposefully designed the computer models to implicate human CO2 emissions as the major culprit for global warming and
climate change.
Unfortunately for the
IPCC and its
climate modelers, these simulated
climate predictions were wrong.
Which explains why
climate modeler Andrew Weaver thinks it's perfectly OK to be a candidate for the Green Party of British Columbia (one of Canada's provinces) at the same time that he's serving as a lead author for the
IPCC.
Small wonder, then, that the
modelers» computer «reconstructions» of the planet's past
climate conveniently wiped out the well - documented three - centuries - long Medieval Warming Period, as well as the subsequent 500 years of Little Ice Age — nor is it surprising that their terrifying computer prognostications in the
IPCC's 2001 Third Assessment failed to predict the next decade's absence of any global warming trend at all.
The
IPCC — Andrew Weaver, who is like the best
climate modeler in Canada or one of the best, said you know, meter, two meters at the outside is all that he can show in models in this century.
The person then in charge of the relevant Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) chapter was Kevin Trenberth — who is described in a recent interview as a «climate modeler and IPCC insider.
Climate Change (
IPCC) chapter was Kevin Trenberth — who is described in a recent interview as a «
climate modeler and IPCC insider.
climate modeler and
IPCC insider.»
In 2012, PhD meteorologist Dr Roy Spencer detailed the problems that Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) climate models, and thus climate modeler experts, were facing concerning Daubert Standard accepta
Climate Change (
IPCC)
climate models, and thus climate modeler experts, were facing concerning Daubert Standard accepta
climate models, and thus
climate modeler experts, were facing concerning Daubert Standard accepta
climate modeler experts, were facing concerning Daubert Standard acceptability.
In accordance with a decision of the
IPCC Bureau in 1998 to release draft scenarios to
climate modelers for their input in the Third Assessment Report, and subsequently to solicit comments during the open process, one marker scenario was chosen from each of four of the scenario groups based on the storylines.
Inasmuch as essentially all of the
IPCC claims of AGW attribution, the projections of future
climate changes and the resulting recommendations to policymakers are based on GCM simulations, this is a fairly damning conclusion that will not make many
modelers (and certainly not
IPCC) happy.
This will still be a challenge for the global
climate modelers to explain, since the
IPCC perspective of global warming requires a more - or-less monotonic increase in Joules within the
climate system, in the absence of a major volcanic eruption (i.e. see A Litmus Test For Global Warming - A Much Overdue Requirement).
To successfully develop geoengineering technologies is going to require the efforts of people from a wide range of backgrounds, just like the
IPCC reports that aren't all prepared by
climate modelers.
The
IPCC and
climate modelers don't claim otherwise.