Not exact matches
For their scenario calculations, the AWI
modellers plugged in atmospheric CO2 concentrations in excess of 500 ppm, a level in keeping with the forecasts released by the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (
IPCC).
So far
modellers have failed to narrow the total bands of uncertainties since the first report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (
IPCC) in 1990.
• Contrary to the common practice of
climate modellers and
IPCC, here comparisons are made in terms of actual values and not departures from means («anomalies»).
What's priceless is the bastard nuclearists who are behind this AGW hoax (in France, all
climate modellers and most of French authors at the
IPCC are in laboratories affiliated with our state agency Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique) are aimed at now by greenies, but with that same hoax.
Why hasn't the
IPCC and the
climate modeller community conducted this analysis themselves?
Dr. David Evans, a former
climate modeller for the Australian government's Greenhouse Office, says he found two mathematical errors showing that the
IPCC «over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times.»
Give me a couple of those billions of US dollars you
climate modellers have, and I will give you the data and present the result at same time as 5AR;-P It does not hurt to be open for other possible truth than the old progress all the time... And take this issue into the
IPCC and ask whether there is institutional and other mechanisms that run contrary to self - correction....