Sentences with phrase «ipcc position on climate change»

None of those you listed endorse the IPCC position on climate change, which is the fundamental basis of the study.

Not exact matches

Head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Rajendra Pachauri's position is looking increasingly untenable with the revelation that he sat on the discovery that one of the IPCC's claims about melting glaciers was without foundation before the Copenhagen summit.

My criticism of Anderson was entirely that I gained the impression he was implying the IPCC take more of an advocacy position and impassioned position on the dangers of climate change which might be unwise for reasons stated.

There is a fairly clear consensus position on climate change among those who know something about climate, and that is summarized by the IPCC, which, contrary to our host's bluster, does list and evaluate outlying positions, but you can not define a minority position.

So Gleick is thrown under the bus but the main concern seems to be the fact that this event has given those who are skeptical of the IPCC (and AGU) «consensus position» on CAGW» fresh fuel for the unproductive and seemingly endless ideological firestorm surrounding the reality of the Earth's changing climate.»

In 1997 he declared that Dr. Bert Bolin, then chairman of the IPCC, had changed his position on climate change and denied a connection between global warming and extreme weather, accusations that Bolin called «inaccurate and misleading.»

It is NOT about whether or no «skeptics» have used «bad practices» (i.e. «hide the decline» methods) to support their various objections to the «official» IPCC «mainstream position» on climate change.

For this reason, the IPCC consensus position is entitled to strong respect that, at the very minimum, climate change poses a legitimate significant threat to human well - being and the natural resources on which life depends.

The consensus position is understood to be that which has been articulated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

'' whether you are starting from a position of general acceptance of the mainstream view on anthropogenic climate change across disciplines (as expressed in IPCC, national academy summaries etc.)»

This doesn't actually help any framing, because it still seems to intentionally obfuscate the interesting question, whether you are starting from a position of general acceptance of the mainstream view on anthropogenic climate change across disciplines (as expressed in IPCC, national academy summaries etc.) or not.

A fourth set of allegations is that University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit (CRU) scientists abused their positions on Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) writing groups to impede the consideration of papers challenging CRU's work.

You will find that although the wording and sometimes emphasis of their statements differ, every major scientific organization that has taken a position on climate change takes essentially the same views as the IPCC.

in which the growing scientific consensus on the human impact on climate change is characterized as folks just following social trends, or that the IPCC position on global warming is based on the «hockey stick».

Moreover, they determined that Easterbrook had distorted the results of a poll taken of scientists on the issue and mischaracterized the positions of the National Academy of Sciences and the IPCC to downplay the growing consensus regarding climate change.

So we find a person in his 20's who has yet to be awarded a PhD, who has been a Greenpeace activist, but who is awarded a position as a coordinating lead author on a vital IPCC Chapter which concludes with very high confidence that mitigation is required to head off the more damaging effects of man - made climate change.

The approach was to examine the general position that «Legal scholarship has come to accept as true the various pronouncements of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and other scientists who have been active in the movement for greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions to combat global warming.»

Compare that with the dozens of statements on climate change from various scientific organisations around the world representing tens of thousands of scientists, the consensus position represented by the IPCC reports and the 11,000 signatories to a petition condemning the Bush administration's stance on climate science.