Not exact matches
I agree (as does
IPCC) that there is
uncertainty, as stated,
in the
climate sensitivity, but you are completely unjustified
in your claim that the cosmic - ray correlation (for which there is still no sound physical basis or quantified mechanism) supports the lower end of the
sensitivity range.
It is not all that earthshaking that the numbers
in Schmittner et al come
in a little low: the 2.3 ºC is well within previously accepted
uncertainty, and three of the
IPCC AR4 models used for future projections have a
climate sensitivity of 2.3 ºC or lower, so that the range of
IPCC projections already encompasses this possibility.
The
IPCC's attribution statement does not seem logically consistent with the
uncertainty in climate sensitivity.
The
IPCC range, on the other hand, encompasses the overall
uncertainty across a very large number of studies, using different methods all with their own potential biases and problems (e.g., resulting from biases
in proxy data used as constraints on past temperature changes, etc.) There is a number of single studies on
climate sensitivity that have statistical
uncertainties as small as Cox et al., yet different best estimates — some higher than the classic 3 °C, some lower.
How is the persistent factor of 3
uncertainty in climate sensitivity consistent with the
IPCC confidence levels?
Contribution from working group I to the fifth assessment report by
IPCC TS.5.4.1 Projected Near - term Changes
in Climate Projections of near - term climate show small sensitivity to Green House Gas scenarios compared to model spread, but substantial sensitivity to uncertainties in aerosol emissions, especially on regional scales and for hydrological cycle var
Climate Projections of near - term
climate show small sensitivity to Green House Gas scenarios compared to model spread, but substantial sensitivity to uncertainties in aerosol emissions, especially on regional scales and for hydrological cycle var
climate show small
sensitivity to Green House Gas scenarios compared to model spread, but substantial
sensitivity to
uncertainties in aerosol emissions, especially on regional scales and for hydrological cycle variables.
It seems to me that the issue is not so much that the
IPCC AR4 chapter 9 authors have made an error
in determination of the
sensitivity in Fig 9.20, but rather that there is unacknowledged structural
uncertainty in their methods for determining
climate sensitivity (both statistical and physical / conceptual).
«
uncertainty» (
in the
IPCC attribution of natural versus human - induced
climate changes,
IPCC's model - based
climate sensitivity estimates and the resulting
IPCC projections of future
climate) is arguably the defining issue
in climate science today.
In context of the way climate sensitivity is defined by the IPCC, uncertainty in climate sensitivity is decreasing as errors in previous observational estimates are identified and eliminated and model estimates seem to be converging mor
In context of the way
climate sensitivity is defined by the
IPCC,
uncertainty in climate sensitivity is decreasing as errors in previous observational estimates are identified and eliminated and model estimates seem to be converging mor
in climate sensitivity is decreasing as errors
in previous observational estimates are identified and eliminated and model estimates seem to be converging mor
in previous observational estimates are identified and eliminated and model estimates seem to be converging more.
Changes
in cloudiness
in a warmer
climate can be either a negative or positive feedback and the
uncertainty in this feedback is the major source of
uncertainty in the
IPCC's estimate of
climate sensitivity.
Energy budget estimates of equilibrium
climate sensitivity (ECS) and transient
climate response (TCR) are derived based on the best estimates and
uncertainty ranges for forcing provided
in the
IPCC Fifth Assessment Scientific Report (AR5).
Knutti and Hegerl
in the November, 2008 Natural Geoscience paper, The equilibrium
sensitivity of the Earth's temperature to radiation changes, says various observations favor a
climate sensitivity value of about 3 degrees C, with a likely range of about 2 — 4.5 degrees C per the following graphic whereas the current
IPCC uncertainty is range is between 1.5 - 4.5 degrees C.