Sentences with phrase «irr if»

Don't you think that the young women there should have a shot at having an IRR if they want one?»

Not exact matches

Industry sources said including general partner capital in the average net IRR calculation can make a material difference if that commitment is sizeable.

If a project can not meet a minimum IRR, then don't invest in it.

In other words, it is the internal rate of return (IRR) of an investment in a bond if the investor holds the bond until maturity and if all payments are made as scheduled.

We prefer downside probabilities where if it is a zero it means it is a 0 % IRR, but a 0 % IRR still keeps our capital intact.»

If we throw some of these numbers in an IRR calculation we get some pretty decent results.

As an experiment, I change my headline to «BF interested in IRR with like - minded individual» to see if it would get more attention from non-black men.

I don't know and I can't tell if they're interested in IRR's or not.

IRR Where do you think you would be now if you had decided to continue publishing independently?

IRR has the benefit of being comparable over all security types and can take into account costs of holding (for commodities etc.) and fees incurred if those cashflows are included.

@carney My comment: If you pay $ 400M to get $ 500M over 30 years, the IRR is 1.45 %.

If this 10 % annual ROE, and two times book value exit were to occur, the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) to TAVF on the investment would be 32 %.

My rules of thumb just skim the surface of their approach, but if you're in the mood for calculating DCF / IRR analyses for multiple companies, and / or monitoring deal metrics, I think you'll see over time that they are a reasonable approximation.

If I'm able to get $ 55 for the balance of my shares by the end of this year, my IRR should improve by a couple of percentage points.

Of course, you can calculate an Expected IRR also, if you wish, but let's not go crazy here..!

To be honest I don't know what would be the right rate to adjust the premiums upwards, but if we assume constant level of premiums until the number of policies go down by half (say 2017), the IRR drops by a couple of percentage points.

In Ireland, this can be remarkably short if there are no hiccups / objections — my estimate of about 40 days proved to be right, for a gross IRR of 256 %.

If they both live to be 100, the IRR would still only be 5.57 %.

If they live to age 85, after 23 years the IRR will finally have risen to 3.47 %.

Even if the Jeffersons lived forever, the IRR couldn't exceed 6 % because they lost their original $ 500,000.

They lay out the bullish case for the company and assume that if you hold it for three years that an internal rate of return (IRR) on BDX if purchased now would be 17.6 % annualized.

Just wondering if you think the the potential capped returns (max of about ~ 15 % IRR) justify the risk assumed?

The big driver here will always be time, rather than return — even a v small Gross Return looks extraordinary on a Gross IRR basis if the timeline involved is v short.

Am I right that this difference accounts for the difference IRR amount calculated by Quicken which is always lower than if use the XIRR function in Excel and do not account for dividends and interest income as contributions.

If you're inputting months, which is the most - common, then cell F11 will multiply cell F8 by 12 and display the annual IRR (compounded monthly).

If you can control the capital allocation (i.e. if you owned 100 % of Outerwall and could just run off all of the cash flow), maybe it can produce a decent IRIf you can control the capital allocation (i.e. if you owned 100 % of Outerwall and could just run off all of the cash flow), maybe it can produce a decent IRif you owned 100 % of Outerwall and could just run off all of the cash flow), maybe it can produce a decent IRR.

If you're inputting annual cash flow data, then the number shown in cell F8 is the annualized IRR (and you can ignore F11).

If that cost were factored in, the IRR would go down considerably.

If you are fortunate enough to correctly identify a miss - priced equity and have accurately determined its intrinsic value, your IRR is determined by the mystery timing of «markets catching up with value».

If you have equal periods, you use the IRR function, which is a special case of XIRR.

Or let's picture you've 20 stocks to choose from: A catalyst may simply be the deciding factor in making a stock choice, or (if you want to be more precise) it can be a marvelous stock selector in terms of respective (potential) IRRS.

Ultimately, your only real risk is longevity — if these golden tickets manage to live a little longer, that obviously ratchets down your IRR.

But with the shares up over 70 % from my original purchase price even if they tread water for another 8 months (until the LTCG holding period kicks in) I'll have met my IRR target.

There are also calculators online that can determine the IRR for you (and if you use Aurora, our financial analysis features will generate this value automatically).

To consider the claims of «greenhouse warming» from one arena of SCIENCE then, if you also look at the atmospheric absorbance of energy (see link below), you will see how relevant the behavior of atmospheric water actually is in shaping the scavenging of IrR (especially Microwave Spectrum) energy BEFORE surface incidence is achieved.

For instance, if you find that you double discounted in your IRR formula, that is a BIG DEAL.

This IRR is very high during the early days of the policy because if you made only one monthly premium payment, and then suddenly died your beneficiaries would still get a lump sum benefit.

Hello, Mr Reddy, thanks for your views, just want make one point that IRR is considering 100 years, which is only in exceptional case, if some one die after 70 years then IRR may be around 8 %, if you consider 100 years then obsessively IRR will be low.

If the average return on the collared Index over the next 30 years is equal to the worst rolling 30 - year period since 1920 (which, as noted in the chart, was 6.9 percent), the cash surrender value IRR at the end of Year 30 will be 5.56 percent rather than the 6.32 percent that is projected on the Policy illustration assuming a 7.5 percent Index return.

Similar way, if we compute for 40 years insured person, for Rs 100,000 maturity amount the single premium works out to be Rs 62,935 and IRR comes to 5.28 %.

If we compute the IRR (Investment rate of return) keeping away the loyalty additions, then it works out to be Rs 5.92 %.

As to CCR question... if your deal is a 17 % IRR and half of that return is paid out during the hold period and the other half is paid upon sale, you'll attract a different investor than if your 17 % IRR is 10 % cash flow and 90 % from the sale.

If the metric numbers used in real estate (e.g., COC, IRR) are the highway directional signs, then net worth is the destination.

Can you explain why IRR's sometimes peak for a holding period, but then decline if you keep the property longer?

It's not uncommon to see the IRR peak for a certain holding period, but then decline if you keep the property longer.

Brueggeman and Fisher (1993) indicate that borrowing will contribute to positive before - tax leverage if the unlevered before tax IRR is greater than the effective cost of the loan, which in addition to the loan interest rate reflects and additional costs such as points, prepayments, etc

If an IRR is above a pre-defined number it is an acceptable investment.

If the capital value is not known and we want to calculate it, then the market equivalent yield or overall required IRR for comparable properties needs to be determined and inserted in the above formula.

Are there cases where sponsors are rewarded if they meet certain cash on cash targets, rather than IRR?

In my view, if the deal is lower on cash flow but has higher upside (IRR), go with the 8 % pref and the higher split.