Sentences with phrase «ice age things»

But if we go back to the Ice Age things were quite different, says professor Tine Rasmussen from CAGE.

Lot of evolution gone on before and during those; before our recent ice ages things were even messier.

Not exact matches

One thing to know: The captain of Canada's ice hockey team, Poulin was once dubbed the «female Sidney Crosby» for her lofty accomplishments at a young age.

With many people in the modern age struggling with wheat and even dairy intolerances, I've made it a bit of a mission to formulate a super speedy but delicious ice cream substitute that's made from wholesome ingredients, and this is the next best thing to real ice cream prepared the traditional way with cream and full cream milk.

Things that have survived all the climate wiggles since the last ice age are now disintegrating,» he says.

To get to the bottom of things, he mapped the ages and locations of 1,323 woolly mammoth remains and 576 archaeological sites, and he merged them with data from plant and pollen records, and climate change information from ice cores in Greenland.

A sillier argument was also laid to rest: the one that says global warming might be a good thing because it would protect us from the next ice age.

And he has this ice age scenario, which Jensen and Kamin share; and when the human race came out of Africa, the theory is that East Asians, Koreans, Japanese and Chinese, were trapped north of the Himalayas during the ice ages and therefore were selected most rigorously by a harsh environment for intelligence and for prudence and all sorts of things.

Monckton says: «First the UN implies that carbon dioxide ended the last four ice ages» [This is actually untrue the «UN» implies no such thing, nor does any competent scientist!]

Be that as it may, all these studies, despite the large variety in data used, model structure and approach, have one thing in common: without the role of CO2 as a greenhouse gas, i.e. the cooling effect of the lower glacial CO2 concentration, the ice age climate can not be explained.

I would choose the PayPal cash and use it to buy books and a couple of things for home (I have an ice cream maker in my wish list for ages) and I would love a new sweater or cardigan.

The only thing separating this film from 2012: Ice Age or Apocalypse Pompeii is the nature of the disaster and the gender of the main character.

If you like this kind of adventures you will definitely like this one GO FOR IT, but for me there are quite a few better classics out there such as monkey islands 1 - 3, day of the tentacle, prisoners of ice, broken sword 1 - 2, discworld, L. S. Larry (specially 7)... Summarising, it is a really good game, just getting to know Manny makes it worth playing, but it has barely made it to my top ten list of point and click adventures, there are better things out there and, specifically, better Tim Schafer stuff (even broken age felt better, well... only chapter 1, not 2).

For Jolie, her desire to save the entire third world, one orphan at a time, manifests itself in a picture that poses the big - lipped beauty carefully as a fashion plate and a sainted martyr; a debutante with an amazing wardrobe and a UN worker with a streak of activism; and a figure in its way as ridiculous as Gooding Jr.'s caricature of a severely mentally - disabled man (James Robert Kennedy) that reminds, of all things, of that acorn - crazed, pre-verbal prehistoric squirrel from Ice Age.

Global warming has hit the Ice Age and things are getting a little drippy.

On the whole, it aspires to the look and emotional feel of Pixar, although in the latter arena it's closer to things like Shrek and Ice Age (sans flatulence).

To put things in perspective, the global temperature shift between the last Ice Age and now is believed to be 10 °F; and an estimated 11 °F increase in world temperatures was sufficient to wipe out 95 % of species at the end of the Permian Period 250 million years ago.

It is true that old fears of a new ice age did not originate with climate scientists [edit — no nonsense please] and I confess to being someone who worried about such things at that time.

It's that, rather than the «ice age» scenario, that is the thing to be concerned about.

The thing I find a bit curious about the result that is the subject of this blog article, though, is the statement that the model used reproduces the Little Ice Age climate simply as a response to the luminosity reduction.

Now, if you're fudging things just to get the «Hockey Stick» (but missing the 8.2 ky event, the «Little Ice Age» or the PETM), then that's just wrong and not scientific.

How the above pieces address Judge's questions I get the feeling that the Judge has some misconceptions about things from the way some of the questions are phrased, particularly the question about atmospheric CO2 having reflective properties, and the «little ice age» being lumped together with other ice ages.

Timothy I'm not a scientist but I do find certain things interesting for the strangest of reasons and one of those things was the idea that Scandinavia was rising rather quickly due to having lost the ice from the last ice age.

In other words, during the 1970s, when some would have you believe scientists were predicting a coming ice age, they were doing no such thing.

Monckton says: «First the UN implies that carbon dioxide ended the last four ice ages» [This is actually untrue the «UN» implies no such thing, nor does any competent scientist!]

What we have right now (in my view) is an opportunity to actually control things and prevent both the positive feedback being enough to lead to rapid temperature growth, and the negative feedback being enough to cause an ice age.

In the age of global warming, one thing is certain: There will be less ice and snow.

Although the exact causes for ice ages, and the glacial cycles within them, have not been proven, they are most likely the result of a complicated dynamic interaction between such things as solar output, distance of the Earth from the sun, position and height of the continents, ocean circulation, and the composition of the atmosphere.

Walter Starck noted that if only humans really were able to heat the globe, «and it helps to prevent another ice age, this would be the most fortunate thing that has happened to our species since we barely escaped extinction from an especially cold period during the last ice age some 75,000 years ago.»

Bob, that burn some carbon to delay ice - age impacts is one thing I sometimes raise.

Not being a climate scientist, and not realizing in the mid-70's that there WAS such a thing, I'm sure you will forgive me for noticing that all the articles in the «popular press», like «Newsweek», «Popular Science», «Popular Mechanics», «Science Digest», newspapers, et al warning us of an imminent ice age and proposing methods of staving off disaster were simply being made up out of whole cloth by science editors to drum up circulation while the real Climate Scientists were frantically trying to warn us that we were about to be rendered into cracklings by anthropogenic CO2.

AGW may be just the thing we need to hold of the next Ice Age, for instance.

What we need to fear is not gradual warming but descent into a new ice age, which is historically about due, and would bring huge suffering for humans and most other living things.

You see the thing is I have been waiting for a long time for someone to explain the lack of «forcing» that aerosols, three orders of magnitude greater than present, during the ice - ages.

The Earth might have been in the midst of a new ice age, Europe might have been too cold to support industry, and things may not have gotten going at all.

The only thing that maybe correct in the analysis is the oscillation, because the warming trend from the mini ice age is in the data too.

And while you are doing that, davie, you might tell us in your own words how less than 1c warming since the end of the little ice age and the beginning of the industrial revolution, measured with ever changing systems in areas of exponential land use change by people who have a total, consensual belief in global warming by ACO2 and no demonstrable scientific scepticism whatsoever, must constitute a «bad thing», awa being scientifically based and believable.

Bottom line is current epoch is an ice age and if there's any damn thing humans can possibly to warm it up to the normal non-ice age conditions it should be embraced not shunned.

Jim D: A similar thing was seen in Canada, Alaska, and Scandinavia at the end of the last Ice Age with those kinds of temperature rises.

A similar thing was seen in Canada, Alaska, and Scandinavia at the end of the last Ice Age with those kinds of temperature rises.

Coarse or perhaps vulgar deniers are those horrible leg warmer type things — those are probably what they mean by «climate change deniers» — because you'd not want bare legs in an ice - age.

Among other things, if one sets aside the astronomical Milankovich cycle suggestion as the driver of glacial epochs, the ice ages might be quasi-periodic oscillations like the ENSO pattern.

For people (interested in following science news) living in West Europe the first thing that may come to mind when they hear that date is the Little Ice Age — the somewhat cooler climate timeframe that lasted until approximately 1850.

CO2 is a natural greenhouse gas at trace levels, but without any CO2 in the atmosphere not only would the biosphere be in trouble but in terms of climate the Earth would be in a permanent ice - age, all other things being equal.

Age of the gas in the bubbles equal to the age of the ice layer... If someone says such things, I take every other remark of the same person with lots of salt, to say it politeAge of the gas in the bubbles equal to the age of the ice layer... If someone says such things, I take every other remark of the same person with lots of salt, to say it politeage of the ice layer... If someone says such things, I take every other remark of the same person with lots of salt, to say it polite...

For example, while it may not seem very likely that we at this very moment are on the precipice of the next Ice Age, it nevertheless is very likely that all life on Earth will someday face just such an event — whether or not that fact is appreciated when it happens — and irrespective of the fact that there will be nothing that any living thing can do about it.

James Abbott said CO2 is a natural greenhouse gas at trace levels, but without any CO2 in the atmosphere not only would the biosphere be in trouble but in terms of climate the Earth would be in a permanent ice - age, all other things being equal.»

Ludwick: If you're old enough to remember those «imminent ice age» media reports, you're old enough to have noticed that the media likes to hype things for ratings.

It's a good thing we got out of the little ice age, for example.

In the past 400, maybe, but then that means Mann's data only shows that things are warmer then they were during the Little Ice Age.